In the midst of Orly Taitz’s latest surge of crazy, Indiana
seems to have dealt her quite a nice bitch slap. Her ballot challenge case in
Indiana where she first claimed to be just a witness, and then filed as a
plaintiff after being denied Pro Hac Vice to act as an attorney was heard on
June 12th. It like all of her cases was dismissed. Obot Legal
Lohengrin was there in the courtroom to give a first hand account of actual
proceedings, as there is no point listening to Orly’s version of events if
facts are what you are after. His entire report can be read “Here” on The Fogbow. The hearing was also
discussed at length on RC Radio later that night and you can listen that
show “Here”. Lots of good stuff there!
Here’s a snip from LL’s report, but it’s worth a look to
read the whole thing:
In preliminary matters, the court announced the hearing
concerned the 3/23 petition for declaratory and injunctive relief and three
defendant motions of 4/16, the objection to Taitz's appearance, the IEC's
motion to dismiss, and the motion for sanctions, as well as Orly's motion for
stay under the AOPA. Judge Reid explained that any motions received after her
order setting the hearing were not on the table today and would be addressed at
a future hearing. Considering the outcome, that seems unlikely, but with Orly,
we can be sure she'll do something else in this case.
Orly started with an
absurd argument that she never received a written order setting these other
matters for hearing, and that it was a violation of her due process rights to
move forward on anything other than her own injunction hearing. Judge
Reid pointed out again that Orly was pro se and not representing anyone else,
and that therefore, the other petitioners would have to address the matter
individually. They could not represent each other nor could Orly represent
them. This was how the rest of the hearing was conducted, although to some
extent, it was a charade, as by the end of the hearing, Judge Reid was merely
asking whether any of the petitioners had anything to add.
She
told the court repeatedly during the hearing that she never received the “Written Order” issued on May 21st, yet
she posted the damn thing on her website on May 25th. A screenshot
of that post was used by the SOS as evidence of Orly’s bald faced lie in their “Supplemental Motion for Sanctions” which
was filed on June 21st, and tis a thing of beauty too, so it is! The
sanctions they request to cover attorney fees from having to waste their time
on this nonsense total $9405.00. Divide that amount by the 5 (so-called)
plaintiffs, and if granted will cost them $1881.00 each. The best part of that
is that the CA Bar requires any attorney sanctioned by a court in an amount of
$1000.00 or more to report it to the Bar.
So Orly will have to report her self to the CA Bar, and the other 4
plaintiffs will get a good taste of what happens when they hitch their wagons
to a lunatic like Orly Taitz.
Funny thing is that I’ve yet to see any response at all to
this from the Great Birfer Queen, defender of lies, gossip and hearsay
herself. Maybe she’s been too busy to
notice with all her other delusional crusades. She’s still fighting and hurling
accusations of fraud and corruption in every direction in the recent CA Senate
primary because she lost that too, and of course if it hadn’t been for fraud
she would have won.
She’s also RE-RE-RE (I forget how many REs) appealing her
long lost “Taitz v Astrue” case. Because you see, even though Shuriff Joe
wouldn’t give her a daffydavit to use in her court cases, he did give one to
another birfer lawyer in Florida. So Orly stole it, or downloaded off the
Internet to use herself (without his permission) as yet even more “new evidence” against the dreaded
criminal usurper Barack Obama, or whatever she says his name really is in her
continuing attempt to access President Obama’s SS records.
On June 27th she posted on her website that she
had filed an ethics complaint with the House Of Representatives Ethics
Committee against Nancy Pelosi for (what else) Fraud on the Court, Elections
Fraud, Aiding and Abetting use of Forged Documents, Signing a
Fabricated/Altered document, and of course Treason.
On June 28th she posted on her website another
call for sedition.
WOW. 360 degrees turn. Justice Roberts weasels and says that
the individual mandate is unconstitutional under the commerce clause, but constitutional
as a new tax. Obamacare is declared as a new heavy burden tax on your
shoulders! Second American revolution is on the way for the states to secede.
Posted on | June 28, 2012 | No Comments
Snip
This is shocking. SCOTUS originally announces that Obamacare
is unconstitutional under Commerce clause but at the end rules that it can be
considered constitutional as a new heavy burden, new tax on all of us, even
though the feds claimed this is not a new tax.
Snip
I suspected that Roberts might pull this and
prepared a plan B law suit on Obamacare. You will see it shortly. When people
will read it they will be screaming: take this burden off my shoulders or I am
ready for a revolt. I will be filing it shortly. I will probably change the
court though, different rout.
One has to wonder
how anyone can be such a chronic loser, and not realize they are nothing but
exactly that.
I
guess there is just no telling whatever will be next, nothing seems to insane
for her so we'll just have to wait and see.
