Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Orly Taitz Accuses Judge Malihi Of Being An “Iranian Muslim”

After the losing (as expected) her elections challenge against Obama in Georgia, Orly posted on her website:

Posted on February 7, 2012”
Posted on February 7, 2012”
Posted on February 7, 2012”
Everyone is corrupt, everyone else is always wrong, and it’s always a conspiracy.
Posted on February 9, 2012”
Posted on February 10, 2012”

As well as being the most legally incompetent (so-called) lawyer in this country, this woman is deranged beyond hope. In order for her to file her appeal in GA she is required to submit an application as an out of state attorney to practice “Pro Hac Vice” in the state of GA where she is not personally licensed to practice law. Instead of doing what was legally required she went ahead on Feb 13th and filed her “Appeal”  and a “Motion for PHV”  the same day. She completely disregarded all requirements to properly apply for PHV and basically submitted a statement claiming that she had been granted PHV by ALJ Malihi for the administrative hearing and was requesting PHV to appeal the decision in Fulton County Superior Court. Her actual appeal was of course “Standard Orly Operating Procedure”.

"Such assumption by Malihi, that Obama was born in the U.S., without any documentary evidence to that extent from Obama, goes beyond an abuse of judicial discretion, it represents judicial misconduct."

Wow, big surprise there. What wasn’t a surprise was the Court’s response: “Denied”

“In preparing and filing her Motion for Pro Hac Vice, Ms. Taitz failed to comply with the requirements of Uniform Superior Court Rule 4.4. Uniform Superior Court Rule 4.4 specifically provides that a Domestic Lawyer seeking to be admitted pro hac vice in a proceeding pending in the State of Georgia shall file a Verified Application for Admission in the Court where litigation is filed including the following:
1. The applicant's residence and business address;
2. The name, address and phone number of each client sought to be represented;
3. The court before which the applicant has been admitted to practice and the respective period(s) of admission, and contact information as to each such court;
4. Whether the applicant: (a) has been denied admission pro hac vice in this state, (b) had admission pro hac vice revoked in this state, or (c) has otherwise formally been disciplined or sanctioned by any court in this state. If so, specify the nature of the allegation; the date filed; and what findings were made and what action was taken in connection with those proceedings;
5. Whether any formal, written disciplinary proceeding has ever been brought against the applicant by a disciplinary authority in any other jurisdiction and, as to each such proceedings: the nature of the allegations; the name of the person or authority, the date the proceedings were initiated and finally concluded; the style of the proceedings; and the findings made and actions taken in connection with those proceedings;
6. Whether the applicant has been held formally in contempt or otherwise sanctioned by any court in a written order for disobedience to its rules or orders, and, if so: the nature of the allegations; and the substance of the court’s rulings (a copy of the written order of transcript of the oral rulings shall be attached to the application);
7. The name and address of each court or agency and a full identification of each proceeding in which the applicant has filed an application to appear pro hac vice in this state within the preceding two years; the date of each application; and the outcome of the application;
8. An averment as to the applicant’s familiarity with the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, local court rules and court procedures of the court before which the applicant seeks to practice;
9. The name, address, telephone number and bar number of an active member in good standing of the bar of this state who will sponsor the applicant’s pro hac vice request. The bar member shall appear of record together with the Domestic Lawyer.”

Looking at these requirements for submitting this application it’s easy to see why Orly tried to skip it. This is what she would have had to provide from Judge Land’s “Order”  imposing fines and sanctions on her in Georgia on Oct. 13th 2009:

"When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer uses the courts as a platform for a political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer personally attacks opposing parties and disrespects the integrity of the judiciary, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer recklessly accuses a judge of violating the Judicial Code of Conduct with no supporting evidence beyond her dissatisfaction with the judge’s rulings, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law, that lawyer ceases to advance her cause or the ends of justice."
"After a full review of the sanctionable conduct, counsel’s conduct leading up to that conduct, and counsel’s response to the Court’s show cause order, the Court finds that a monetary penalty of $20,000.00 shall be imposed upon counsel Orly Taitz as punishment for her misconduct, as a deterrent to prevent future misconduct, and to protect the integrity of the Court."
"The Clerk’s Office was burdened by Ms. Taitz’s inability to follow the Court’s rules regarding pro hac vice admission and the Court’s rules for electronic filing. On five separate occasions in a short period, the Clerk’s Office personnel error-noticed counsel for her failure to follow simple rules. At the hearing, counsel failed to make coherent legal arguments but instead wasted the Court’s time with press conference sound bites and speeches."
"In her motion for reconsideration, counsel did not address the substance of the Court’s order dismissing her case. Rather, counsel used the motion for reconsideration as a platform to repeat her political diatribe against the President, to accuse the undersigned of treason, and to maintain that “the United States District Courts in the 11th Circuit are subject to political pressure, external control, and . . . subservience to the same illegitimate chain of command which Plaintiff has previously protested.”

Judge Land also had a copy of that order forwarded to the California Bar. She was also “Sanctioned and Fined”  $250 in the Liberi v Taitz case for her failure to comply with court orders.

Here we can see that she has been hurling the same ole shit at every Judge that defies her (which is all of them) all along. She knew damn well that they wouldn’t approve her if she applied properly and was stupid enough to think she could just slip by. She finally got around to responding to this denial on Feb. 17th:

"Update on GA and other states. We had similar problems with the additional fee and other problem, that were resolved
Posted on February 17, 2012"
I, also, wrote to the court, that in the administrative court I was granted the right to represent the clients pro hac vice- meaning an out of state attorney representing in state client. Though usually it is required for an in state attorney to co-sign the case, when the case is handled pro-bono (at no charge to indigent client) and/or it is a civil rights case, the requirement for the in state co-counsel is waived. Judge Wright was not willing to waive this requirement. I got a response from her, she wanted full complience with the in state counsel co-signing and additional information. While I have no problem supplying additional information, It is impossible to find a co-counsel who is not frightened to take upon these most explosive issues, dealing with Obama using a stolen Social Security number and a forged birth certificate.

Considering that most of this is complete BS, isn’t it just shocking that the court expects her to actually “comply with the court rules”? What bloody nerve! Yes Orly does have a problem providing the information required because doing so would prove what an incompetent twit she really is. It’s no wonder she couldn’t find a competent in state attorney to sponsor her, no one would be incompetent enough to touch her or her insanity with a 10-foot pole.

Instead of fighting this, knowing that the only thing she is likely to get out of it is sanctioned again, she tells her client David Farrar to go ahead without her and file on his own. Then the turns around and files this little gem. A petition for “Letters Rogatory” 

It is apparent, though, that this court places form over substance and found the need for a local attorney to co-sign the pleadings to be more important than the underlying issue of the most egregious violation of human rights and civil rights in the history of this nation, namely Barack Obama's (Hereinafter "Obama") lack of any valid identification papers and his use of a stolen Social Security number and his practice of posting a computer generated forgery on line as a basis and documentary legitimation of his presidency and a 2012 presidential run.”

No, it’s actually more like they probably know what an idiot she is and have no intention of turning her and her insanity loose on the GA Courts.

"As such, in the absence of the pro hac vice authorization from this court, and lack of local attorneys with enough strength of character to take on the issue of egregious criminality committed by the sitting President, Taitz advised the plaintiffs to proceed pro se. Taitz, herself, proceeds pro se for a limited purpose of seeking Letters Rogatory from this court to the First Circuit court of HI and DC court."

Again, more like there are no local attorneys dumb enough to want anything to do with her.

"The world legal community can vividly see, that US system of justice reached such an unprecedented level of corruption, that a complete fraud and a criminal without any identification papers at all can get in the position of the President and Commander in Chief."


"This court has an opportunity to clean up this corruption and show, that there is still a rule of law in the United States of America. Original documents are the best evidence of eligibility. If this court sends letters rogatory to the First Circuit court in Hawaii and the Superior Court in the District of Columbia, such best evidence can be obtained. It is imperative for this court to send Letters Rogatory to the First Circuit court of Hawaii, seeking subpoena for the Director of Health of the state of Hawaii to produce for inspection the original 1961 long form birth certificate for Barack Hussein Obama, which he claims exists."

And here’s where the acid/LSD or what ever she is doing must have kicked in because she is certainly tripping on something.

Taitz does not have access to all of the background information, and is not making an accusation or definitive allegation, however the following issues represent the biggest threat to national security and require consideration and further in depth investigation:
a. When Malihi had Obama cornered with subpoena to appear at trial and present his identification records, it was clear that Obama had nothing to show and desperate Obama would do anything to keep his position and stay out of prison.
b. At the same time we have an escalation of hostilities with Iran, when a radical Muslim Iranian leader Mahmood Ahmadinejad is building nuclear weapons, threatening to use those nuclear weapons against the US and is closing the straits of Hormuz to U.S. ships while Iranian warships are crossing the Suez canal into the Mediterranean. U.S. is demanding a halt to Iranian nuclear program.
c. Malihi's background appear to show, that he is an Iranian Muslim. While the administrative court of Georgia shows lengthy bios of other judges, there is only a blank page as a background of Judge Malihi.
d. After Obama did not even show up at trial and did not provide any documents to prove his eligibility, while Taitz brought multiple witnesses, who provided the most incriminating evidence against Obama, inexplicably Malihi ruled that Obama can be on the ballot.
d. Shortly thereafter Obama announced his plans for a unilateral disarmament, where he is proposing a destruction of 80% of the U.S. nuclear arsenal, that represents the biggest assault on the U.S. national security ever to take place in U.S. history. (Exhibit 6 February 14- 15, 2012 articles featuring Associated Press reports of Obama administration plans to unilaterally reduce the U.S. nuclear arsenal from 1550 warheads to 300-400 warheads). This comes on the heels of a number of other decisions by Obama, which threaten the U.S. National Security and the U.S. national economy. These facts are so troubling, that copies of these pleadings are being sent to the FBI, Department of Justice, US Congress and judges and election boards in sister states, who are reviewing Obama's eligibility as well. This is another compelling reason, why a person without any identification papers cannot be on the ballot running for the U.S. President. That is why it is essential for this court to send aforementioned Letters Rogatory in order to obtain the best evidence of the original identification records and resolve the issue of Obama's records once and for all. This is being requested with the reservation of rights in argument of Obama's lack of eligibility based on Minor v Happerset 88USl63(1875) interpretation of the natural born U.S. citizen."

She begins here by insulting the court, then accuses the entire judicial system of “unprecedented” corruption and fraud, then asks the GA court to send letters to the First Circuit Court of HI, and the District Court of Columbia and force them to give her access to every thing she wants after they all told her to FOAD. Then she accuses Judge Malihi of being an Iranian Muslim and appears to suggest that he bribed Obama saying he would rule in his favor in exchange for Obama reducing U.S. nuclear arsenal so Iran can gain a nuclear advantage over the U.S.

I’m telling you, this woman is tripping on something; there can be no other explanation. Meanwhile she is firing off “election challenges” in states all over the country sending all the “evidence” from the GA hearing because she believes now that it’s all been admitted to the court record, its all really truly “official” evidence now.

Un-be-lievable! There is no telling what she’s going to pull out of her ass next but I’m sure it will be entertaining, as well as slanderous, a violation of professional conduct, and bigoted.

1 comment:

  1. You are great! Wonderful compilation. I can go through the list and study them for better understanding.