Saturday, February 4, 2012

Another Birther Fail Imagine That!

Like I’ve said before, betting on birther cases is like betting on a horse race that has already been run. After a week of birthers whooping it up about their great victory in Georgia, and claims that “This one’s in the bag” before the Judge even ruled on the case, that bag just got pulled right down over their heads.

For 3 years Orly Taitz has been screeching and crying that she couldn’t get a single Judge to “rule on the merits” or even hear the merits of her case. And yes, it’s always been HER case. Oh she’s had various “plaintiffs” over the last 3 years, those stupid enough to believe that Orly was actually representing “them” in these absurd lawsuits, and she’ll no doubt find more in her futile attempt to keep her “birfer movement” alive. But the truth is that they have never been or never will be anything to her that even resembles an actual “client”. They’re nothing more to her than completely disposable individuals to be used and discarded as necessary to further her agenda.

She’s a real “use ‘um and lose ‘um" kind of being, (I hesitate to use the word person). One who not only uses people, but she has no qualms what so ever about seducing the gullible with her claims of history making “victory any day now” while trashing people’s entire lives in the process like she did Terry Lakin. No skin off her nose! Still, it’s really kind of hard to pity anyone stupid enough to buy into her tripe.

Well her big day finally came and her “case” was actually heard on its merits. Something she has been squirming for like a bitch in heat for 3 years. Completely unopposed she was finally able to sputter and spew all her “evidence” into the record. I’m actually glad she finally got that chance, because not only can she never say again that her case “has never been heard on the merits”, or that “no Judge has ever ruled that Obama is in fact a Natural Born Citizen”, but because it’s also finally been thrown out on the merits. Or should I say thrown out on the lack of anything resembling a merit?

Yesterdays ruling from Judge Malihi can be read in its entirety “Here” at Jack's, but just for fun let’s have a look at what he said.

“As required by Georgia Law, Secretary of State Brian Kemp referred Plaintiffs' challenges to this Court for a hearing. O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5(b). A hearing was held on January 26, 2012. The record closed on February 1, 2012. Plaintiffs Farrar, Lax, Judy, Malaren, and Roth and their counsel Orly Taitz, Plaintiffs Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell and their counsel J. Mark Hatfield, and Plaintiff David P. Welden and his counsel Van R. Trion, all appeared and answered the call of the case. However, neither Defendant nor his counsel, Michael Jablonski, appeared or answered. Ordinarily, the Court would enter a default order against a party that fails to participate in any stage of a Defendant's failure to appear, Plaintiffs asked this Court to decide the case on the merits of their arguments and evidence. The Court granted Plaintiffs' request.”

And in regard to the "evidence and merits" the Judge ruled:

Snip
“The Court finds the testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support Plaintiffs' allegations Mrs. Taitz attempted to solicit expert testimony from several of the witnesses without qualifying or tendering the witnesses as experts.”

Snip
“None of the testifying witnesses provided persuasive testimony. Moreover, the Court finds that none of the written submissions tendered by Plaintiffs have probative value. Given the unsatisfactory evidence presented by the Plaintiffs, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs' claims are not persuasive.”

Or in other words, the entire case is completely full of shit.

Snip
“Plaintiffs allege that President Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States and, therefore, is not eligible to run in Georgia's presidential primary election.”

And his reply to that allegation?

Snip
"Relying on the language of the Constitution and the historical reviews and analysis of Minor and Wong Kim Ark, the Indiana Court concluded that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural-born British subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in allegiance of the United States [] natural-born citizens.”
916 N.E.2d at 688. The Indiana Court determined that a person qualifies as a natural born citizen if he was born in the United States because he became a United States citizen at birth.
For the purposes of this analysis, this Court considered that President Barack Obama was born in the United States. Therefore, as discussed in Arkeny, he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen. Accordingly,
CONCLUSION
President Barack Obama is eligible as a candidate for the presidential primary election under O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5(b)."

So there you have it! The case has been heard “on the merits”, thrown out as merit-less and the Judge has ruled that President Barack Obama is a Natural Born Citizen, regardless of the citizenship of his father according to the facts and the law, period. Everything else that Orly have been pulling out of her ass for the last 3 years has been disregarded and the baseless garbage it is.

What will birfers learn from this ruling? Not a damn thing. “Stupid is as stupid does” and this will hardly stop them from wasting court time and resources across the country failing over and over to stop “the scary black man” from being reelected.

Snork!

1 comment: