Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Orly Taitz Accuses Judge Malihi Of Being An “Iranian Muslim”

After the losing (as expected) her elections challenge against Obama in Georgia, Orly posted on her website:

Posted on February 7, 2012”
Posted on February 7, 2012”
Posted on February 7, 2012”
Everyone is corrupt, everyone else is always wrong, and it’s always a conspiracy.
Posted on February 9, 2012”
Posted on February 10, 2012”

As well as being the most legally incompetent (so-called) lawyer in this country, this woman is deranged beyond hope. In order for her to file her appeal in GA she is required to submit an application as an out of state attorney to practice “Pro Hac Vice” in the state of GA where she is not personally licensed to practice law. Instead of doing what was legally required she went ahead on Feb 13th and filed her “Appeal”  and a “Motion for PHV”  the same day. She completely disregarded all requirements to properly apply for PHV and basically submitted a statement claiming that she had been granted PHV by ALJ Malihi for the administrative hearing and was requesting PHV to appeal the decision in Fulton County Superior Court. Her actual appeal was of course “Standard Orly Operating Procedure”.

"Such assumption by Malihi, that Obama was born in the U.S., without any documentary evidence to that extent from Obama, goes beyond an abuse of judicial discretion, it represents judicial misconduct."

Wow, big surprise there. What wasn’t a surprise was the Court’s response: “Denied”

“In preparing and filing her Motion for Pro Hac Vice, Ms. Taitz failed to comply with the requirements of Uniform Superior Court Rule 4.4. Uniform Superior Court Rule 4.4 specifically provides that a Domestic Lawyer seeking to be admitted pro hac vice in a proceeding pending in the State of Georgia shall file a Verified Application for Admission in the Court where litigation is filed including the following:
1. The applicant's residence and business address;
2. The name, address and phone number of each client sought to be represented;
3. The court before which the applicant has been admitted to practice and the respective period(s) of admission, and contact information as to each such court;
4. Whether the applicant: (a) has been denied admission pro hac vice in this state, (b) had admission pro hac vice revoked in this state, or (c) has otherwise formally been disciplined or sanctioned by any court in this state. If so, specify the nature of the allegation; the date filed; and what findings were made and what action was taken in connection with those proceedings;
5. Whether any formal, written disciplinary proceeding has ever been brought against the applicant by a disciplinary authority in any other jurisdiction and, as to each such proceedings: the nature of the allegations; the name of the person or authority, the date the proceedings were initiated and finally concluded; the style of the proceedings; and the findings made and actions taken in connection with those proceedings;
6. Whether the applicant has been held formally in contempt or otherwise sanctioned by any court in a written order for disobedience to its rules or orders, and, if so: the nature of the allegations; and the substance of the court’s rulings (a copy of the written order of transcript of the oral rulings shall be attached to the application);
7. The name and address of each court or agency and a full identification of each proceeding in which the applicant has filed an application to appear pro hac vice in this state within the preceding two years; the date of each application; and the outcome of the application;
8. An averment as to the applicant’s familiarity with the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, local court rules and court procedures of the court before which the applicant seeks to practice;
9. The name, address, telephone number and bar number of an active member in good standing of the bar of this state who will sponsor the applicant’s pro hac vice request. The bar member shall appear of record together with the Domestic Lawyer.”

Looking at these requirements for submitting this application it’s easy to see why Orly tried to skip it. This is what she would have had to provide from Judge Land’s “Order”  imposing fines and sanctions on her in Georgia on Oct. 13th 2009:

"When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer uses the courts as a platform for a political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer personally attacks opposing parties and disrespects the integrity of the judiciary, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer recklessly accuses a judge of violating the Judicial Code of Conduct with no supporting evidence beyond her dissatisfaction with the judge’s rulings, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law, that lawyer ceases to advance her cause or the ends of justice."
"After a full review of the sanctionable conduct, counsel’s conduct leading up to that conduct, and counsel’s response to the Court’s show cause order, the Court finds that a monetary penalty of $20,000.00 shall be imposed upon counsel Orly Taitz as punishment for her misconduct, as a deterrent to prevent future misconduct, and to protect the integrity of the Court."
"The Clerk’s Office was burdened by Ms. Taitz’s inability to follow the Court’s rules regarding pro hac vice admission and the Court’s rules for electronic filing. On five separate occasions in a short period, the Clerk’s Office personnel error-noticed counsel for her failure to follow simple rules. At the hearing, counsel failed to make coherent legal arguments but instead wasted the Court’s time with press conference sound bites and speeches."
"In her motion for reconsideration, counsel did not address the substance of the Court’s order dismissing her case. Rather, counsel used the motion for reconsideration as a platform to repeat her political diatribe against the President, to accuse the undersigned of treason, and to maintain that “the United States District Courts in the 11th Circuit are subject to political pressure, external control, and . . . subservience to the same illegitimate chain of command which Plaintiff has previously protested.”

Judge Land also had a copy of that order forwarded to the California Bar. She was also “Sanctioned and Fined”  $250 in the Liberi v Taitz case for her failure to comply with court orders.

Here we can see that she has been hurling the same ole shit at every Judge that defies her (which is all of them) all along. She knew damn well that they wouldn’t approve her if she applied properly and was stupid enough to think she could just slip by. She finally got around to responding to this denial on Feb. 17th:

"Update on GA and other states. We had similar problems with the additional fee and other problem, that were resolved
Posted on February 17, 2012"
I, also, wrote to the court, that in the administrative court I was granted the right to represent the clients pro hac vice- meaning an out of state attorney representing in state client. Though usually it is required for an in state attorney to co-sign the case, when the case is handled pro-bono (at no charge to indigent client) and/or it is a civil rights case, the requirement for the in state co-counsel is waived. Judge Wright was not willing to waive this requirement. I got a response from her, she wanted full complience with the in state counsel co-signing and additional information. While I have no problem supplying additional information, It is impossible to find a co-counsel who is not frightened to take upon these most explosive issues, dealing with Obama using a stolen Social Security number and a forged birth certificate.

Considering that most of this is complete BS, isn’t it just shocking that the court expects her to actually “comply with the court rules”? What bloody nerve! Yes Orly does have a problem providing the information required because doing so would prove what an incompetent twit she really is. It’s no wonder she couldn’t find a competent in state attorney to sponsor her, no one would be incompetent enough to touch her or her insanity with a 10-foot pole.

Instead of fighting this, knowing that the only thing she is likely to get out of it is sanctioned again, she tells her client David Farrar to go ahead without her and file on his own. Then the turns around and files this little gem. A petition for “Letters Rogatory” 

It is apparent, though, that this court places form over substance and found the need for a local attorney to co-sign the pleadings to be more important than the underlying issue of the most egregious violation of human rights and civil rights in the history of this nation, namely Barack Obama's (Hereinafter "Obama") lack of any valid identification papers and his use of a stolen Social Security number and his practice of posting a computer generated forgery on line as a basis and documentary legitimation of his presidency and a 2012 presidential run.”

No, it’s actually more like they probably know what an idiot she is and have no intention of turning her and her insanity loose on the GA Courts.

"As such, in the absence of the pro hac vice authorization from this court, and lack of local attorneys with enough strength of character to take on the issue of egregious criminality committed by the sitting President, Taitz advised the plaintiffs to proceed pro se. Taitz, herself, proceeds pro se for a limited purpose of seeking Letters Rogatory from this court to the First Circuit court of HI and DC court."

Again, more like there are no local attorneys dumb enough to want anything to do with her.

"The world legal community can vividly see, that US system of justice reached such an unprecedented level of corruption, that a complete fraud and a criminal without any identification papers at all can get in the position of the President and Commander in Chief."


"This court has an opportunity to clean up this corruption and show, that there is still a rule of law in the United States of America. Original documents are the best evidence of eligibility. If this court sends letters rogatory to the First Circuit court in Hawaii and the Superior Court in the District of Columbia, such best evidence can be obtained. It is imperative for this court to send Letters Rogatory to the First Circuit court of Hawaii, seeking subpoena for the Director of Health of the state of Hawaii to produce for inspection the original 1961 long form birth certificate for Barack Hussein Obama, which he claims exists."

And here’s where the acid/LSD or what ever she is doing must have kicked in because she is certainly tripping on something.

Taitz does not have access to all of the background information, and is not making an accusation or definitive allegation, however the following issues represent the biggest threat to national security and require consideration and further in depth investigation:
a. When Malihi had Obama cornered with subpoena to appear at trial and present his identification records, it was clear that Obama had nothing to show and desperate Obama would do anything to keep his position and stay out of prison.
b. At the same time we have an escalation of hostilities with Iran, when a radical Muslim Iranian leader Mahmood Ahmadinejad is building nuclear weapons, threatening to use those nuclear weapons against the US and is closing the straits of Hormuz to U.S. ships while Iranian warships are crossing the Suez canal into the Mediterranean. U.S. is demanding a halt to Iranian nuclear program.
c. Malihi's background appear to show, that he is an Iranian Muslim. While the administrative court of Georgia shows lengthy bios of other judges, there is only a blank page as a background of Judge Malihi.
d. After Obama did not even show up at trial and did not provide any documents to prove his eligibility, while Taitz brought multiple witnesses, who provided the most incriminating evidence against Obama, inexplicably Malihi ruled that Obama can be on the ballot.
d. Shortly thereafter Obama announced his plans for a unilateral disarmament, where he is proposing a destruction of 80% of the U.S. nuclear arsenal, that represents the biggest assault on the U.S. national security ever to take place in U.S. history. (Exhibit 6 February 14- 15, 2012 articles featuring Associated Press reports of Obama administration plans to unilaterally reduce the U.S. nuclear arsenal from 1550 warheads to 300-400 warheads). This comes on the heels of a number of other decisions by Obama, which threaten the U.S. National Security and the U.S. national economy. These facts are so troubling, that copies of these pleadings are being sent to the FBI, Department of Justice, US Congress and judges and election boards in sister states, who are reviewing Obama's eligibility as well. This is another compelling reason, why a person without any identification papers cannot be on the ballot running for the U.S. President. That is why it is essential for this court to send aforementioned Letters Rogatory in order to obtain the best evidence of the original identification records and resolve the issue of Obama's records once and for all. This is being requested with the reservation of rights in argument of Obama's lack of eligibility based on Minor v Happerset 88USl63(1875) interpretation of the natural born U.S. citizen."

She begins here by insulting the court, then accuses the entire judicial system of “unprecedented” corruption and fraud, then asks the GA court to send letters to the First Circuit Court of HI, and the District Court of Columbia and force them to give her access to every thing she wants after they all told her to FOAD. Then she accuses Judge Malihi of being an Iranian Muslim and appears to suggest that he bribed Obama saying he would rule in his favor in exchange for Obama reducing U.S. nuclear arsenal so Iran can gain a nuclear advantage over the U.S.

I’m telling you, this woman is tripping on something; there can be no other explanation. Meanwhile she is firing off “election challenges” in states all over the country sending all the “evidence” from the GA hearing because she believes now that it’s all been admitted to the court record, its all really truly “official” evidence now.

Un-be-lievable! There is no telling what she’s going to pull out of her ass next but I’m sure it will be entertaining, as well as slanderous, a violation of professional conduct, and bigoted.

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Final Decision In The Georgia Election Challenge

Read it and weep birfers… DENIED

“Judge Michael Malihi, Administrative Law Judge for the Office od State Administrative Hearings, held a hearing on each candidate challenge on January 26, 2012 and entered an initial decision for the above-captioned cases on February 3, 2012. The Secretary of State formally adopts the initial decision of the ALJ into this final decision.

Therefore, IT IS HEARBY DECIDED THAT the above-captioned challenges are DENIED."

SOOP to follow in 3…2…1….

Sunday, February 5, 2012

Clueless Wonder Orly Taitz Appeals Again Surprise Surprise

The fact that Orly Taitz has immediately appealed Judge Malihi’s ruling in the Georgia elections challenge is about as much of a surprise as it is that the sun comes up every day. It is also no surprise that she will never accept the fact that the reason she loses everything she files is not because the system is “corrupt” as she chronically complains, but because of her own stupidity and complete legal incompetence.

“Standard Orly Operating Procedure” (“SOOP”)

1st Ignore reality
2nd File as much crap as you can as fast as you can
3rd File everything as either an emergency motion or emergency appeal
4th Appeal everything
5th Accuse everyone of being a criminal
6th Lose anyway

This is the pattern that has been unbroken since Orly Taitz made her birfer début 3 years ago. And true to form, she has sent an “Emergency Appeal” to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp to set aside the recommendation issued by Judge Malihi in Farrar v Obama. As usual you can always find all of the birther court documents at “Jack Ryan’s Scribd”.  (Thanks Jack!) And Orly’s Emergency Appeal can be read in its entirety at Jack’s “Here”

She begins (as usual) shouting (all in upper case) that the Judge is not just WRONG for not deciding in her favor, but “criminally wrong”.


Again a clear case of “SOOP”, and of course her screeching is not just directed at the Judge in this case. She fires off in all directions.

“Not only Obama did not show up at the proceedings and did not provide any certified copies of his vital records, also, Director of Health of the state of Hawaii, Loretta Fuddy did not show up at the proceedings and did not provide any records. Orly Taitz, Counsel for Plaintiffs, flew to Hawaii 5 times at her own dime and served the director of Health with Federal and state subpoenas. Director of Health refused to cooperate, refused to appear and refused to provide access to any vital records for Obama, even though he posted an alleged copy of his birth certificate on line and privacy considerations no longer applied. Based on the above facts, it is clear that the Director of Health of Hawaii and the Registrar are being complicit in either releasing a forgery or guilty of criminal cover up, whereby they are aware, that Obama's alleged copy of his birth certificate is a forgery, they have an affirmative duty to speak up and they did not do so.”

She truly sounds very much like a 5 year old throwing a temper tantrum. “Waaaaahhhh they’re all ignoring meeeeee”.

“This behavior of judge Malihi was so outrageous, that not only his advisory opinion needs to be set aside, as not grounded in any fact or law, but state and county grand juries and the Attorney General of Georgia need to launch a criminal investigation into actions of judge Malihi and possible direct or indirect undue influence by Obama. Decision by Malihi reads, as if it was entirely written by Obama's personal attorneys Robert Bauer and Judith Corley of Perkins Coie and rubber stamped by Malihi. It is noteworthy, that both Robert Bauer and Judith Corley need to be criminally investigated as well, as both of them were complicit in aiding and abetting Obama in presenting to the public on April 27, 2011 a computer generated forgery and claiming it to be a true and correct copy of Obama's birth certificate. Such assumption by Malihi, that Obama was born in the U.S., without any documentary evidence to that extent from Obama, goes beyond an abuse of judicial disretion, it represents judicial misconduct.”

“SOOP” Orly is always right, and everyone that does not agree with that is a criminal. She goes on in her “appeal” to re-plead her entire losing (full of shit) argument to the SOS and finally comes to her “Conclusions”.

“Advisory opinion by judge Malihi is erroneous and represents a gross abuse of judicial discretion. Advisory opinion by judge Malihi was made in complete contradiction of all the facts of the case, state law, U.S. Constitution and known precedents and decisions by judge Malihi himself. It appears that the advisory opinion by judge Malihi was made as a result of some undue pressure from the defendant Obama, who as a sitting President has vast abilities to apply undue pressure on judges."

According to Orly EVERY Judge that she comes in contact with has been “pressured” by Obama. (Eyes Roll!)

"Advisory opinion by judge Malihi needs to be set aside. Obama should be prevented from appearing on the ballot, as he did not present any evidence to prove that he is a natural born citizen. No original identification and birth records were provided by defendant Obama, no certified copies were provided. No defense was provided whatsoever. Obama was in contempt of court. Obama should be excluded from the ballot in the state of GA."

I think the fact that she can’t even win against an empty chair completely unopposed is really biting her ass.

"Case file with exhibits and court transcripts need to be forwarded to the County, State and Federal grand juries for criminal prosecution of Obama and any and all accomplices of Obama for elections fraud, uttering of forged and altered documents, obstruction of justice, wire fraud, Social Security fraud and conspiracy to commit aforementioned felonious acts. Criminal investigation of any undue influence on judge Malihi need to be launched by the investigative unit of the office of the Secretary of State and all of the above grand juries, as well as Attorney General of GA. Additionally, criminal investigation of actions of Director of Health of Hawaii Loretta Fuddy, Registrar Alvin Onaka, Deputy Attorney General Jill Nagamine, Commissioner of Social Security Michael Astrue and others involved in this matter, should be launched by the aforementioned grand juries and Attorney General of GA.”

Orly not only wants the Georgia SOS to start criminal investigations of the POTUS, she wants him to go after officials in the state of Hawaii as well as the Social Security Administration. This idiot has no fucking clue what so ever!

Anyone want to bet on the outcome of this clueless wonder’s latest appeal?

I thought not.

Saturday, February 4, 2012

Another Birther Fail Imagine That!

Like I’ve said before, betting on birther cases is like betting on a horse race that has already been run. After a week of birthers whooping it up about their great victory in Georgia, and claims that “This one’s in the bag” before the Judge even ruled on the case, that bag just got pulled right down over their heads.

For 3 years Orly Taitz has been screeching and crying that she couldn’t get a single Judge to “rule on the merits” or even hear the merits of her case. And yes, it’s always been HER case. Oh she’s had various “plaintiffs” over the last 3 years, those stupid enough to believe that Orly was actually representing “them” in these absurd lawsuits, and she’ll no doubt find more in her futile attempt to keep her “birfer movement” alive. But the truth is that they have never been or never will be anything to her that even resembles an actual “client”. They’re nothing more to her than completely disposable individuals to be used and discarded as necessary to further her agenda.

She’s a real “use ‘um and lose ‘um" kind of being, (I hesitate to use the word person). One who not only uses people, but she has no qualms what so ever about seducing the gullible with her claims of history making “victory any day now” while trashing people’s entire lives in the process like she did Terry Lakin. No skin off her nose! Still, it’s really kind of hard to pity anyone stupid enough to buy into her tripe.

Well her big day finally came and her “case” was actually heard on its merits. Something she has been squirming for like a bitch in heat for 3 years. Completely unopposed she was finally able to sputter and spew all her “evidence” into the record. I’m actually glad she finally got that chance, because not only can she never say again that her case “has never been heard on the merits”, or that “no Judge has ever ruled that Obama is in fact a Natural Born Citizen”, but because it’s also finally been thrown out on the merits. Or should I say thrown out on the lack of anything resembling a merit?

Yesterdays ruling from Judge Malihi can be read in its entirety “Here” at Jack's, but just for fun let’s have a look at what he said.

“As required by Georgia Law, Secretary of State Brian Kemp referred Plaintiffs' challenges to this Court for a hearing. O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5(b). A hearing was held on January 26, 2012. The record closed on February 1, 2012. Plaintiffs Farrar, Lax, Judy, Malaren, and Roth and their counsel Orly Taitz, Plaintiffs Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell and their counsel J. Mark Hatfield, and Plaintiff David P. Welden and his counsel Van R. Trion, all appeared and answered the call of the case. However, neither Defendant nor his counsel, Michael Jablonski, appeared or answered. Ordinarily, the Court would enter a default order against a party that fails to participate in any stage of a Defendant's failure to appear, Plaintiffs asked this Court to decide the case on the merits of their arguments and evidence. The Court granted Plaintiffs' request.”

And in regard to the "evidence and merits" the Judge ruled:

“The Court finds the testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support Plaintiffs' allegations Mrs. Taitz attempted to solicit expert testimony from several of the witnesses without qualifying or tendering the witnesses as experts.”

“None of the testifying witnesses provided persuasive testimony. Moreover, the Court finds that none of the written submissions tendered by Plaintiffs have probative value. Given the unsatisfactory evidence presented by the Plaintiffs, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs' claims are not persuasive.”

Or in other words, the entire case is completely full of shit.

“Plaintiffs allege that President Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States and, therefore, is not eligible to run in Georgia's presidential primary election.”

And his reply to that allegation?

"Relying on the language of the Constitution and the historical reviews and analysis of Minor and Wong Kim Ark, the Indiana Court concluded that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural-born British subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in allegiance of the United States [] natural-born citizens.”
916 N.E.2d at 688. The Indiana Court determined that a person qualifies as a natural born citizen if he was born in the United States because he became a United States citizen at birth.
For the purposes of this analysis, this Court considered that President Barack Obama was born in the United States. Therefore, as discussed in Arkeny, he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen. Accordingly,
President Barack Obama is eligible as a candidate for the presidential primary election under O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5(b)."

So there you have it! The case has been heard “on the merits”, thrown out as merit-less and the Judge has ruled that President Barack Obama is a Natural Born Citizen, regardless of the citizenship of his father according to the facts and the law, period. Everything else that Orly have been pulling out of her ass for the last 3 years has been disregarded and the baseless garbage it is.

What will birfers learn from this ruling? Not a damn thing. “Stupid is as stupid does” and this will hardly stop them from wasting court time and resources across the country failing over and over to stop “the scary black man” from being reelected.


Thursday, February 2, 2012

Orly Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest

When I was a teenager (in the 70’s) I took a summer camping trip once to the Florida Keys with a group of friends. As we set up camp on a beautiful little stretch of beach somewhere on the Atlantic side I remember just standing and looking out at the breathtaking view before me. When suddenly I heard a voice behind me, “So like, where y’all from?” I turned around and there stood a guy who called himself Moses. He was standing there completely naked, except for a “lucky seed” necklace and he was toking away on a big ole Cheech and Chong sized joint. I was speechless.

Moses introduced himself and said he lived in a tree house behind the lagoon. Among other things he claimed he had come to this country on a big ship with Ponce de Leon. Now that happened nearly 40 years ago and in all this time I don’t think I’ve ever come across anyone or anything as completely crazy as I thought Moses was. My encounter with Moses now ranks 2nd on my craziest shit I’ve ever seen list.

Even before listening to Orly Taitz’s “presentation” at the Georgia eligibility hearing, which at times was hard to follow even sitting right there in the courtroom, I thought she easily ranked 2nd place on my list. But now that I’ve read the “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law” brief she submitted yesterday, she has moved into 1st. I certainly hope that when Judge Malihi reads this he is not drinking coffee because there is no doubt it will shoot right out of his nose.

I do believe that Orly must think that she has died and come back as Archibald Cox… (only on acid). For nearly 3 years she has run across this country from court to court, state to state trying desperately to get a Judge, any Judge to give her the chance to “present her case on the merits”. Of course she has never found one that would give her tripe the time of day, until now.

In reality, (a place I doubt Orly Taitz has ever been) there was only one question before the court in this case. That question is whether or not Obama is eligible to be on the presidential ballot for 2012. Before the hearing on December 20th 2011 the Judge “Ordered”  the following:

“All parties must be prepared to submit Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law by 5:00 PM, February 5, 2012. The parties are encouraged to limit their proposed order to twenty-five (25) or fewer pages, and only include pertinent facts and law. All citations will be reviewed carefully. Therefore, it would be injudicious to embellish the testimony of witnesses or points of law.”

(The date of Feb 5th was moved up to Feb 1st after the hearing.)

If I ever had any, I have no doubts now that Obama’s attorney blowing off the entire hearing and refusing to even participate in the birfer circus was the best move he could have made. And after reading what Orly filed as her “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law” I imagine that the poor boy is still laughing his ass off.

Orly’s filing can be read in its entirety “Here”  at Jack Ryan’s Scribd. But to highlight the certifiable insanity of it all here are a few choice bits, not including the fact that she misspelled her own name at the very beginning.


“Plaintiffs seek their attorneys’ fees and costs. Plaintiffs also assert that evidence of criminality as well as contempt of court and rule of law exhibited by the defendant, Obama, is so egregious that it warrants forwarding of the evidence and findings of this court to the Attorney General of Georgia for criminal prosecution of Obama for elections fraud, uttering of forged and altered documents, Obstruction of Justice and Social Security fraud. Additionally, the evidence submitted to this court warrants forwarding to the immigration and deportation services of the Department of Homeland Security for criminal prosecution; as well as to the U.S. Congress for impeachment for High Crimes and Misdemeanors committed by Defendant, Obama. Furthermore, Defendant and his attorney should be held in contempt of court and properly sanctioned for failure to comply with the subpoena duly issued and served on the defendant by the Plaintiffs counsel, Orly Taitz.”

She started off on a real roll there! In regard to the citizenship of Obama’s father she explains.


“At the time of Obama's birth, his father, who came from Mombasa, Zanzibar region of Kenya, was a British "protected person". Obama automatically inherited his father's British citizenship upon the British Nationality act of 1948. Upon the declaration of the Independence of Kenya on December 11, 1963, Barack Obama automatically received his Kenyan citizenship on December 12, 1963. As Obama was around five years old his mother remarried one Lolo Soetoro, Indonesian national. According to Obama's memoirs (Dreams from my Father) and official biography, it is common knowledge that the family immigrated to Indonesia around 1967. Obama's school records from Indonesia (P trial exhibit 7) show him using last name Soetoro and nationality Indonesian. So, from birth until today, Obama had citizenship of three other countries, he is a son of a foreign national and a step son of another foreign national, therefore not eligible to be considered a natural born U.S. citizen according to the precedent of Minor v Happersett.”

She rolls on from there with all the “evidence” she’s ever discovered in the last 3 years that she claims proves Obama is not eligible to be POTUS along with laying out the testimonies of all her “expert wittiness”. Every bit of which is still nothing but hearsay, speculation, Internet rumors, and down right delusions. This bit is priceless.


“Defendant did not produce any evidence, any documents verifying his birth. The only thing he is relying on, is that on April 27, 2011 he posted a computer image on line and claimed that this computer image is a true and correct copy of his birth certificate, issued in 1961. He posted this image on mugs and T-shirts and sells them for $25 apiece, claiming it to be a verification of his eligibility. It is possible, that an image on a mug constitutes a prima facia evidence in Mombasa, Kenya, maybe an image on a T-shirt represents a competent, admissible evidence in Jakarta, Indonesia, however in the United States of America, where we hopefully retained a rule of law, an image on mugs and T-shirts represents neither prima facia evidence, nor competent, admissible evidence. The only thing it represents, is complete disrespect of law and of 311 million American citizens.”

Right. Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t Orly submit on several occasions a picture of a tee shirt with a bunch of letters on it as evidence that Obama’s BC was a forgery?


"Defendant did not present any evidence to refute above testimony and to refute evidence showing him using different last names: Soetoro and Soebarkah and him having Indonesian citizenship. As an Indonesian citizen he does not qualify to run for the U.S. Presidency. There is no evidence to show Obama legally changing his name from Soetoro or Soebarkah to Obama. If Obama is not his legal name, he cannot be on the ballot in the state of GA under the name Obama.”

He didn’t present any evidence to refute anything because he had better sense that to even show up at this farce. I wonder how she expects Obama to present “evidence” that he changed his name back to Obama if there is no actual proof that he changed if from Obama in the first place. As for her interpretation of his not showing up?


Defendant's behavior shows guilty mind. Defendant had an opportunity to appear in court and provide certified copies of his vital records. He chose not to show up and not to produce any records. An inference can be made, that he does not possess any valid records, which would explain his behavior. This particularly significant, as this is the first time the issue of Obama's eligibility is being heard on the merits. Until now all of the eligibility challenges were dismissed on procedural grounds, such as lack of standing to challenge a sitting president, lack of jurisdiction or abstention. This is the first challenge, where electors have standing to challenge Obama and can have their challenge heard on the merits. It is reasonable to believe, that if Obama were to possess any valid identification papers, he would have produced them and would have stopped all further challenges on res judicata or collateral estoppel. Obama's contempt of court, refusal to show up in court for trial and lack of any valid identification papers represents circumstantial evidence of guilty mind and inability to respond on the merits and prove his Constitutional and statutory eligibility.”

I guess under Orlylaw the word “inference” constitutes rock solid proof, and the words “circumstantial evidence” means got ‘um by the balls proof. Certainly proof that he has a “guilty mind” is all the proof that’s needed. Well, that AND the OMFG crème de la crème evidence of her entire argument. (Warning, go pee before you read this and make sure there is nothing in your mouth that can spew on your computer monitor or keyboard.)


“Exhibits entered into evidence Case records, p186 show a picture of Obama with his friend Scott Inoue signed Third Grade Honolulu, Hawaii, 1969 (Jerome Corsi Where's the birth Certificate, 2011 edition p 218). This picture contradicts Obama's accounts in his Memoirs and official biography place him in Indonesia from 1967. School records from Assisi school in Jakarta show him attending school there under the name Barry Soetoro from January 1967. On the other hand, his picture from Noelani elementary school in Honolulu Hawaii shows him attending school there in 1968, 1969 under the name Barry Obama. It appears that for a period of two years there were two distinct separate individuals: Barry Obama, who attended Noelani elementary school in Hawaii and Barry Soetoro, who attended Assisi school in Indonesia. It is not clear, how these two individuals merge into one person. It is not clear, who came back from Indonesia: Barry Obama or Barry Soetoro. We have no idea, who is residing in the White House: is it Barry Obama or Barry Soetoro? If it is Barry Soetoro, what happened to Barry Obama?”

That’s right folks, Orly is claiming that for a period of two years Obama somehow split himself into “two distinct separate individuals” not that she explains how this could possibly have occurred, but she admits that she doesn’t know how or if they were ever merged back into one person. I’m telling you, this woman is certifiable!

I have no idea what the Judge will make of this laughable excuse for a court filing. At least the other two lawyers had the good sense to stay out of the twilight zone when they submitted their briefs and stuck to their single claim that a person is required to have 2 citizen parents to qualify as a Natural Born Citizen. Not that that can hold any water either, but I can certainly see why they wanted nothing to do with the Carnival Barking side show that Taitz put on. Weldon v Obama FF&CL can be read “Here”  and Swensson/Powell v Obama can be read “Here” .

So now the ball that Judge Malihi asked for is in his court, and Taitz has finally gotten the chance to present her case on what she claims as “the merits”. I just hope he doesn’t fall off his chair when he reads it. My guess is that he will be as speechless as I was when I came face to face with Moses all those years ago on the beach in Florida. One thing is certain; his reply will be very interesting.