Wednesday, July 27, 2011

The Crazy Daze Of Tin Foil Taitz Continues…

After Orly Taitz filled her “Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment”, as discussed in “Following Up On Taitz v Astrue”  with her completely incompetent attempt at redacting the SSNs as she had been ordered to do by the court, defendant Michael Astrue entered (yet again) a Motion to Strike”  on the basis that Taitz continued to file documents with unredacted SSNs against the order of the court.

“Defendant Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby moves the Court to strike from the record Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and all attached exhibits pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. Those filings contain numerous social-security numbers, along with Plaintiff’s allegations as to the individuals to whom those numbers are assigned. “Unless the court orders otherwise, in an electronic or paper filing with the court that contains an individual’s social-security number . . . a party or nonparty making the filing may include only the last four digits of the social-security number.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a)(1). This is the third time Plaintiff has filed documents that include unredacted social-security numbers in violation of Rule 5.2, and it follows this Court’s order striking Plaintiff’s Complaint, First Amended Complaint, and attached exhibits because they contained unredacted social-security numbers.
See Dkt. No. 13. Defendant accordingly moves the Court to strike Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and all attached exhibits.”

The very next day, on 7/21/11 Judge Lamberth “Granted”  the defendants Motion to Strike and ordered Taitz’s MSJ and all of her attached exhibits stricken from the record. Well this caused Orly to have another birfer conniption fit as she always does whenever a court rules against her, and of course that means100% of the time. She posted this on her website

“I was told by the clerk of the court, that Judge Lamberth reconsidered his prior order, issued today in the morning, and the new order will be posted today. They will give me 2 weeks to file a redacted copy of the MSJ.
Apparently the redacted copy, that was delivered to them by the FedEx (I even posted on this blog all the tracking from Irvine Ca to Washington DC) disappeared. Nobody can find it anywhere in the court. They nearly gave me a heart attack earlier today.
My son, who is helping in the office, told me that I yelled at the clerks so much, that he is afraid, I scarred the patients waiting for their treatment. Luckily the patients said, that they are political supporters of mine and they even ordered three new crowns, so I am good.”

And after screeching her brains out at the Judge’s staff, Judge Lamberth gave her one last chance to file her “redacted” motion. She filed it. Again redacting some numbers by scratching out the last 4 and leaving the first 5 completely bass ackwards according to the law, some the other way around, and some not at all. For Gawd’s sake, just how fucking STOOPID and absolutely incompetent can she be? Apparently there is no limit as far as she is concerned.

In her “Motion for Reconsideration” 

“Emergency motion for reconsideration of 07.21.2011 order striking the opposition to MSJ, due to the fact, that corrected redacted opposition was received by the court on 07.15.2011 by Federal Express and was not docketed by the clerk.”

(Of course nothing is EVER her fault)

She not only screeched at the Judge’s staff to the point of frightening her patients in the office but threw this little tidbit into her Motion as well:

“Plaintiff is greatly concerned, that there is an employee in this court, who is intentionally sabotaging the plaintiff in order to allow person of interest in this case, an individual, occupying the position of the President and Commander in Chief based on a forged long form birth certificate and a fraudulently obtained social security number to continue the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency in violation of civil rights of the plaintiff and 311 million American citizens, who have a right to be governed by a legitimate president.”

Unfucking Believable!

The next day on 7/22/11 Taitz jumps back to the case of Liberi v Taitz where Judge Andrew Guilford issued his order for Taitz to be “Sanctioned and Fined”  for her blatant disregard for court orders in his court, she posts her reply on her website:

(Snip)
“Defendants mistakenly understood, that the order given by this court granting Orly Taitz leave of court to file 12b motion relates to all the entities connected to Orly Taitz and thought that filing separate requests for the same 12b motion would be redundant and will only waste the time of the court. Defendants apologize for the misunderstanding and respectfully request the court to reconsider today’s order and will make sure to file requests for leave of court separately for each entity separately in the future.”
(Snip)
“Defendants are asking the court to review the mitigating factor, that the defendants did not violate any orders of this court before, while the Plaintiffs have violated such order and rules of court repeatedly by filing responses to requests for leave of court and filing over 800 pages of complaint and exhibits one day before the opposition was due and got no sanctions whatsoever.”

She then goes on about how she is but an innocent victim of these dastardly and dangerous criminals who are after her for no rational reason, certainly through no fault of her own and she is the one who has suffered unspeakable emotional distress and unrelenting harassment at the hands of these horrible people.

Yea, right! She goes on:

“Do the plaintiffs need to ask for a leave of court to file a cross complaint and answer the complaint. What are the defendants supposed to do, if a leave of court is not granted? Does it mean that the Defendants have to file their cross complaint against the Plaintiffs in the state court and conduct two actions simultaneously in the Federal and State courts?”

Actually what Orly Taitz really needs to do is go to a real law school somewhere and actually learn a little something about the law, the courts, and how it all actually works in this country so she can figure this shit out for herself.

Jumping right back to Taitz v Astrue, Judge Lamberth responds to Orly’s latest tripe with a “Motion to seal Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment”  on 7/25/11 whe he states in part:

“The documents will not be docketed or placed in the public record because they contain information submitted in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a)(1). See separate Memorandum & Order, issued this date.
The documents will be kept for consideration of possible sanctions against plaintiff.”

In the Separate Memorandum”  Judge Lamberth grants the Defendant’s motion to strike plaintiff’s opposition to defendant’s summary judgment motion and attached exhibits due to plaintiff’s failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure. He also stated,

“The court will not tolerate plaintiff’s repeated violations of this rule”.

He goes on to state:

“The Court’s order [25] striking plaintiff’s opposition did not impose sanctions against plaintiff because defendant had not sought them. Plaintiff should be aware, however, that repeated violations of the rules are in fact sanctionable, even sua sponte, Moreover, wasting the Courts time with nonsense is not the way for plaintiff to have any hope of prevailing in this case.”

In closing he says:

“Plaintiff is either toying with the Court or displaying her own stupidity.”

Now pissing off a federal Judge bad enough for him to make a statement like that is pretty damn bad and anyone with a lick of sense would realize that, of course Orly Taitz has no sense at all. She apparently believes that since she was originally given 2 weeks to re-file her redacted motion even though the Judge has now already ruled on that re-filled motion and denied it that she is free to just keep filing it over and over until she gets it right. Of course Judge Lamberth has nothing better to do than re-read and re-rule on her endless stream of same ole same ole bullshit, right? On her website the next day she posted this:

“resubmitted to DC with different redaction
Posted on July 26, 2011
Attn clerk of the court,
Dear sir/mdm
Per 07.21.2011 order by Judge Lamberth, (see attached) plaintiff is resubmitting attached Opposition and memorandum in opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment by the Defendant. Plaintiff redacted the first five digits in the number xxx-xx-4425 instead of redacting the last four digits per order, even though according to the exhibit 2 of the motion, this number was not assigned by the Social Security administration and does not represent a valid SSA number at all. Please, docket this attached Motion as soon as possible, since Judge Lamberth allowed only 14 days.
Sincerely
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ”

She’s already been sanctioned and fined $20,000 by Judge Land, sanctioned and fined $250 (so far) by Judge Guilford. With a threat of even more sanctions from Judge Lamberth what in the world does she think this kind of ignorance and arrogant disrespect is going to get her? Sanctioned, fined AND disbarred?


Oh I just can’t wait!

Friday, July 22, 2011

Orly Taitz Sanctioned And Fined In Liberi v Taitz

Judge Andrew J. Guilford has sanctioned and fined her $250 for not following court orders. It’s a far cry from the $20,000 she was fined by Judge Land in Georgia, but I suspect it still won’t slow her crazy train down one bit. She has been given 14 days to pay the fine. Here’s a "Link” to the order.

It’s about time these Judges stood up to her blatant defiance of the law and court procedure. Well that makes twice she’s been sanctioned and fined now. I wonder how many more she’ll get before she’s finally DISBARRED?

No response from the Birfer Queen yet, but I bet she’ll be mad as a hornet when she cuts loose on this.

ROFLMAO!

Hay Orly! I’ll bet Lisa is laughing her ass off at you too!

Popcorn…. Check

Beer…. Check

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Following Up On Taitz v Astrue

It seems our not yet but should be disbarred attorney Orly Taitz has been a busy little bat since the state of Hawaii told her to shove her worthless subpoena. First of all on 7/1/11 Defendant Michael Astrue entered a “Motion for Summary Judgment”  documenting that all of the requests Orly submitted were answered and that what she was “legally” allowed to receive was sent to her. End of story.

On 7/5/11, even after being told to stuff it by the state of Hawaii, Orly fired off another subpoena to Hawaii demanding (yet again) that Ms Fuddy, produce Obama’s original typewritten birth certificate. (Link here)  This one is signed by a court clerk, who actually has no more authority than Taitz does. But the Birferverse goes ballistic as Orly proclaims that this subpoena was “issued by the court”. (Which it wasn’t) They’re all just shitting themselves with the “any day now, any day, we got ’um now!” while Orly revels in all the glory and attention of course.

That same day Orly received a letter from the SSA with another copy of Ann Dunham’s original SS-5 form, and you guessed it. Now Orly has even more proof that Ann Dunham is a “forger of vital records” too, just like that no-account son of hers. You see, the first time she received the form she claimed that Ann had submitted the application that she signed in 1959 on a form that Orly swore up and down had a revised date of 1965. Orly’s initial claim being that there was no way Ann could have submitted her application in 1959 on a form that had not yet been created, so that was the first absolute proof that it had been forged. And she had her “document experts” to back her up. But this new letter from the SSA included a list showing all the revision dates of the SS-5 form, and the last revision before Ann submitted her form in 1959 was July of 1956.

So now (if you can follow this) Orly is claiming that the new copy she received of the form Ann signed in 1959 that was legitimately revised in 1956 was actually forged to say revised in 1955 and there were no revisions in 1955, so there’s her new proof that Obama’s mother indeed forged that document. Well first of all, why would anyone with more than half a brain cell bother to take a legitimate form that the state had already been using for 3 years and forge the revision date on it to one year earlier? And second, to my knowledge none of the birfers have ever questioned the fact that Ann Dunham is a natural born American citizen. In which case why the hell would she bother to forge the fucking thing in the first place if she were rightfully entitled to obtain a legitimate SSN? That would not make any kind of sense what so ever! I mean really, the level of STOOPID here is unbelievable! Where the fuck does she get this shit from?

On 7/7/11 she posted her explanation of what all this “subpoena stuff” means on her website so all the flying monkeys can understand just how well she’s doing with this case.

“Explanation from Orly
I guess, I need to explain. I just finished a radio interview and an interview for Sharon Rondeau from “Post and E-mail” , explaining that, but I will explain again.
I served the director of Health with 2 subpoenas. There are two ways to issue subpoenas: first -generated by an attorney and second-generated by the court. Even if the case is in DC, the subpoena will come from the district court in HI, sine the director of Health is in their jurisdiction.
after I served the director of Health, Loretta Fuddy with the the first subpoena, the attorney General of HI responded on her behalf, stating that she will not comply due to the considerations of privacy (totally bogus argument, since Obama already released the document, so he cannot claim privacy as a legitimate issue).
I served them with a second subpoena, this time it is signed by the clerk of the court. Meanwhile I am filing a motion to compel with the judge, saying that they are refusing to comply with the first one and I want a court order."

(Right, she wants a court order. Well, as the old saying goes, she can “want in one hand and shit in the other and see which gets full first!”)

"If meanwhile they comply with the second subpoena, I will withdraw the motion."

(Fat chance they will comply with that!)

"I have multiple opportunities and multiple ways to get there. I’d like to keep my cards close to my chest, so I will not explain further. All I can say, that If the judge does not rule in my favor in the case at hand, I will continue on multiple fronts and at the end of the day a number of people will be sitting in prison. Several highly positioned individuals will be in hot water. ObamaFraudGate and ObamaforgeryGate is 100 times bigger, than Watergate."

(Yea, a hundred times bigger than Watergate… Only in her delusional dreams.)

"It will not go away, it will only grow bigger and it will swallow more and more officials. Democrat party will end up completely annihilated, if it lasts much longer. also, there is a backlash against sitting republican congressmen and senators. My feeling is, that during the next election sitting congressmen from both parties will end up being sent home: Republicans will be sent home during the primary, Democrats -during the general election."

Right, she’s going to annihilate the entire Democratic Party! And here is her “Motion to Compel”  filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia requesting that Judge Lamberth issue an order compelling Director of Health Loretta Fuddy to comply with her subpoena. Of course Orly continually fails to understand that compliance with that subpoena would violate state privacy laws. She still believes that because Obama publicly released his LFBC that state privacy laws no longer apply. Orly and her half a brain cell just cannot comprehend that state privacy laws will only grant access to birth records to those that are rightfully entitled to receive them, and in this case that is not her or any of her flying monkeys. If a rightful recipient, in this case Obama, chooses to publicly release it, that’s his friggin business. He can do any damn thing he wants with it, but the fact that “he” publicly released it does NOT negate the privacy laws in Hawaii. The state is STILL bound by state law!

She goes on in her motion filled with improperly redacted SSNs (as usual) to outline her “evidence of forgery” from her so-called document experts, which consist of a copy machine salesman and a guy who does websites, both of whom drew their conclusions of forgery from looking at pictures on the internet and not by examining actual documents. As well as her claim that since Obama released the LFBC to the public that state law no longer applies, an absolutely ignorant thing for anyone to believe. AND she proudly includes her fraudulently obtained documents from the Selective Service and SSA along with pages of giant blown up typed letters that she and her experts claim don’t match.

For Gawd’s sake! Do none of these idiots know HOW the old manual typewriters even worked? Having to manually crank the paper down, lining it up, pressing down hard on each key to make it type and trying to keep the ribbon straight, I defy anyone to try typing on one and not fuck something up and to make every single letter match exactly. Why the hell do you suppose they had to invent whiteout?

As expected on 7/15/11 Orly files her “Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment”  filed by Astrue on 7/5/11 where she continues her screeching of fraud and cover-ups along with even more unredacted SSNs, even going so far as telling the court there is no point in redacting Obama’s SSN.

“The type of safeguard, that is envisioned in the exemption 6 of FOIA does not exist in case at hand. This exception exists in relation to average citizens, whose name is not known and whose identity might be stolen by someone usng a name and a social security number of a private citizen. In case at hand we have a President of the United States of America using this number. Does the statute envision a hypothetical, when some random Joe six-pack from Any- town America is entering a bank and saying: “I am Barack Hussein Obama, here is my social security number, I want to withdraw a million dollars from this bank account”. Is it likely? Is it plausible? Of course not. While our other presidents might have had more random names and one expects there to be more than one Bill Clinton or Jimmy Carter, nobody has ever found another Barack Hussein Obama in the U.S.A. Uniqness of Obama’s name and his position make exemption 6 irrelevant to him and his vital records, it is safe to say, that even if an unredacted SS-5 is published, nobody will try to steal his identity, never mind with redacted SS-5.”

And yet Orly and her cohort Hollister DID use that SSN to steal Obama’s identity and fraudulently obtain his personal documents. Hollister even changed Obama’s home address in the Selective Service website to his own so the shit could be mailed directly to his house. She concludes her motion with this:

"In conclusion, Michael Astrue, commissioner of the Social Security administration did not provide a shred of admissible evidence to show that the SS-5 even exists, and that it was not assigned to a person, who is deceased now, and that the person, who is using it now, is doing so legally. Plaintiff provided irrefutable evidence that there is a genuine issue of material fact, due to which the motion for summary judgment needs to be denied. Additionally, Plaintiff has provided evidence, showing that there is a high likelihood of fraud, associated with the number in question and a cover up of such fraud. ObamaFraudGate, ObamaForgery Gate is much larger, then the Watergate. It will not go away until the matter is tried in court. More and more governmental officials become complicit in the cover up. Plaintiff believes, that not only the court needs to deny the motion for summary judgment and grant the FOIA request by the Plaintiff, but the court needs to start sua sponte an investigation of the massive fraud, that was uncovered within the SSA and allow the Plaintiff to conduct discovery of such fraud. This needs to be done before the 2012 election, if we ever to have an honest election in this country. Plaintiff believes, that she might be the only person with enough strength of character to conduct such an investigation.
If this court grants the motion for summary judgment and refuses release of the redacted SS-5 for SSN XXX-XX-XXX, (redacted by CIP) this court becomes complicit in the biggest cover up in the history of this nation. Taitz is not asking Your Honor to tilt on windmills, but rather to stand firmly on the broad and sturdy platform of the U.S. Constitution and the overwhelming factual evidence of the case.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ"

No, what Taitz is really asking is for the court to follow her and her delusions down the rabbit hole! With out a doubt Orly Taitz is the most incompetent lawyer that ever “claimed” to have passed a State Bar; because there is no friggin way this moron could have done it on her own. No FRIGGIN way!

On 7/18/11 Orly puts a post on her website asking the FM’s for even more help with her latest delusional allegations.

“Help in research needed. Help me brake the wall of silence and corruption in DC
Posted on July 18, 2011 No Comments
This is the last page of the book by Bill Ayers. Look at the names. I need to find people, who were involved in forgery, in preparing forged birth certificates and forged social security numbers. I was wondering do I hit this wall of silence. There had to be a wave of outrage over Obama’s forged BC, but there is silence. I don’t buy “Blacks will riot” argument. I remember, when a black judge Ellsie Hastings was thrown of the bench for public corruption, nobody rioted.”

No, there was never any “wave of outrage” over Obama’s legitimacy, and the silence is because competent people know that this is all complete bullshit. But I’m glad to see that she’s not worried about “blacks rioting” over her intent to rid this country of that nasty black man usurping the Presidency of the U.S. She goes on to explain just what she believes is really going on:

“what I believe to be at play, is the use of these bogus social security numbers for illegal campaign contributions, money laundering and kickbacks. I believe, that there may be a number of high ranking officials in all 3 branches of government, who got these kickbacks and/or donations, and this is the real reason for silence. This might be the motivation for some not only to be silent, but to actually attack and try to bury an attorney, who brings forward such evidence. So, the exposure of the individuals, involved in forgery, the numbers and the names of the recipients in the judiciary, in Congress might be the catalyst we need to finally brake this wall of silence and corruption. Either they stand up now or they will have to sit for a long time later.”

More shit pulled out of her ass. The only reason for this “wall of silence” as she calls it is because rational people know that this entire quest of hers is more full of shit than a Christmas turkey, and most people simply ignore her. She has absolutely nothing but Internet hearsay, gossip and pure fantasy to back up any of her claims. You know, as far as actual proof goes there is just as much hard evidence on the Internet, (if not more) to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that this planet has been invaded by aliens who are maintaining a secret base on the dark side of the moon as there is evidence of Obama’s forged documents.

Well, all we can do is wait for a response from Judge Lamberth on all this lunacy Orly keeps clogging his court with and I certainly look forward to seeing his reply. I can guarantee you 100% that it will be yet another slap down and a swift kick to the curb. Hopefully even sanctions! All of which will of course be blamed on the “Corruption and Fraud of the Obama Regime”.

Just like in every case she has ever filed, she always has been and always will be nothing but a total loser. In fact I’m pretty sure that the aliens from that secret moon base will conquer this planet before she conquers Obama.