Thursday, April 28, 2011

Obama Discusses The Release Of His Long Form BC With Oprah



Again he mentions “Carnival Barkers” and that does just about sum up Birther Circus Clowns like Orly Taitz, Donald Trump and the like. As badly as Tin Foil Taitz wants people to believe her quest is a matter of “national security” and as often as she has claimed she has “Obama running scared” with all her “evidence”, the truth is she, and her “quest” are probably the biggest jokes at the circus.

Now she’s on a mad desperate mission to prove that the long form BC Obama presented yesterday is a nothing but a Photoshopped forgery. She is clamoring on her website and broadcasting for ANYONE with Photoshop experience to send her an affidavit saying so she can use it as yet more “proof” of fraud. (And by the way, she needs it damn fast because she’s going to court on Monday)

She’s also apparently wearing out the Google button on her Internet browser grasping for straws. Her panic is quite evident in the most recent post on her site.

“there are over a 100.000 articles like these in the last 24 hours posted on Google. People want to know the truth, no photoshopped piece of garbage, flaunted by Obama yesterday, will quash the truth”

Orly, you’re pathetic. The real “truth” has quashed you and proven your mad hunt to remove a sitting president to be nothing more than the insignificant ravings of a mad woman.

Three words of advice:

“SEEK MENTAL ASSISTANCE”

Orly Taitz Batshit Crazier Than Ever

The release of Obama’s Long Form birth certificate seems to have knocked Orly for a loop. Of course her first reaction, to no one’s surprise was to question its authenticity. Her second reaction was to re-direct the focus and keep moving, also to no one’s surprise. She appeared in an interview last night with Lawrence O’Donnell on MSNBC with puffy eyes, and appearing emotionally unstable.



I have a feeling that this grilling is nothing compared to what will happen to her on Monday when she takes those illegally obtained documents to court and starts her double talking bullshit in front of the judge in Barnet/Keys v Obama. Orly Taitz is obviously extremely disturbed, and nothing but a LOT of therapy and serious doses medication will help her, if there is any hope for help at all.

After the interview she went back to her website and posted:

“Lawrence O’Donnell, a new putz on Nazi MSNBC, tells me to “go play with Donald Trump”, after he could not get a grip of the notion that a person with a valid BC from HI does not need to resort to using an invalid Social Security number form CT.”

Exactly Orly, but it’s not O’Donnell that cannot get a grip. You couldn’t get a grip on reality if it walked up and bit you on the ass.

“My interview with NBC, you have to watch it: it is short, but I was able to show evidence of Social security fraud, Selective service fraud and Columbia fraud by Barack Obama”

No Orly, what you showed was evidence of the fraud YOU committed in illegally obtaining those documents that don’t prove shit about Obama.

I’m not sorry to say that I have no pity for her what so ever, and if she ends up being dragged from the courtroom on Monday, either in handcuffs or more likely a straight jacket, I will laugh my ass off. In my opinion she is nothing but an obnoxious hateful racist bitch that doesn’t give a shit about anyone except herself, nor has she ever cared who she has to shit on to get what she wants.

She’s already been sanctioned and fined $20,000 by Judge Land for her incredible arrogance, her ignorance of the law and court procedure, and her continual frivolous court filings.

So yes, Monday will be very interesting indeed.

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Obama Releases The Long Form Holy Grail

And here it is:






“We’re not going to be able to solve our problems if we get distracted by side shows and carnival barkers”
“Now I know that there’s going to be a segment of people for which no matter what we put out this issue will not be put to rest. But I’m speaking to the vast majority of the American people, as well as to the press. We do not have time for this kind of silliness; we’ve got better stuff to do. I’ve got better stuff to do. We’ve got big problems to solve, and I’m confident we can solve them, but we’re going to have to focus on them. Not on this.”


Will this satisfy the Queen of Birfer insanity? Not a chance! Still no words from the nitrous huffing little bat on her blog, but whenever she surfaces, my guess is she’ll come out with both wings flapping.


“TPM”  got an initial reaction this morning:


"Look, I applaud this release. I think it's a step in the right direction," so-called "birther queen" Orly Taitz told me in one of her many media interviews this morning. "I credit Donald Trump in pushing this issue."
But she still has her suspicions. Specifically, Taitz thinks that the birth certificate should peg Obama's race as "Negro" and not "African."
"In those years ... when they wrote race, they were writing 'Negro' not 'African'," Taitz says. "In those days nobody wrote African as a race, it just wasn't one of the options. It sounds like it would be written today, in the age of political correctness, and not in 1961 when they wrote white or Asian or 'Negro'."


No surprise there. In a CNN interview earlier this week Anderson Cooper shredded the “born in Kenya” theory with this:



Of course that enraged Orly, as does everyone and every thing that does not agree with her. On April 25th she plastered her website with:


“Please, write to Ken Jautz, President of CNN US, demand firing of member of “Journalist” hate group Jeffrey Toobin from the position of senior CNN legal analyst.”

Governor Jan Brewer pissed her off also by going on CNN and making the statement that Birthers have become a huge distraction and that indeed Obama was born in Hawaii.

To which Orly replied:


“Read the article and watch the video in the link. Jan Brewer showed herself even more corrupt than anyone could imagine”


So again we see, that she will fling batshit at anyone and everyone that crosses her and her batshit crazy agenda.


I really just can’t wait to see the fool she’s about to make of herself over this. All of her claims in all of her lawsuits, and all of her (so-called) research just flew right out of the bat cave. Her primary claim is that Obama’s SS# is stolen because he was never born here and couldn’t legally obtain one of his own. Well, now that he’s proven he was born here, by producing the very proof she has been after for 2 years, her allegation of SS theft has turned out to be just as full of shit as she is.


That won’t stop her though, and come May 2nd when she goes to court in Barnett v Obama we might just have us a real batshit crazy showdown!

Saturday, April 23, 2011

Background On Barnett Keys v Obama Set For Oral Argument May 2, 2011

Brother this is going to be good. Let’s take a little historical look at the case and get up to speed with what’s happening there, and what’s really transpired as opposed to what Orly claims took place. This case is really no different than all of Orly’s cases, just one giant convoluted confuzel, and a long winded one at that.

Thanks to the wonderful Obots at Politijab and Fogbow we can begin with the events at the hearing on 7/13/09, which explain a lot of what followed.

OFFICIAL COURT TRANSCRIPT 7-13-2009 Hearing  

It’s of interest to note that one of the biggest bugs up Orly’s ass about Judge Carter is her constant claim that Carter stated “he would hear the case on the merits”. This hearing is where she got that idea. On the top of page 52 of the transcript, there is this:

“THE COURT: I mean, if he's not President, he shouldn't be President; if he is, he should be. And we to resolve this on the merits.”

Reading the pages preceding that comment however, you can see that Carter was irritated at Taitz’s failure to properly serve and was trying to explain that if she was to go anywhere with this she first had to follow the rules. At the end of page 51 before he made that statement we have this:

MS. TAITZ: Well okay. Well, what we suggested to the counsel, and I believe I guess what we're gonna do is, if he accepts service today, we will send a FOIA request for a 30-day response.
MR. DeJUTE: I haven't seen it, Your Honor. I haven't -- they may do anything they wish.
THE COURT: That's not an agreement that he's going to comply with that. But get the case into court, for goodness sakes.
MS. TAITZ: Okay."

Judge Carter’s statement about “hearing the case on the merits” was then made and followed by this:

THE COURT: So, Counsel, if you want me to resolve this, I will. I suggest to you tentatively that the ruling would be unfavorable to you. Okay?
MS. TAITZ: Well,
THE COURT: And, therefore, if you can file today, it resolves all the jurisdictional issues. It will spin through the labyrinth, but it will come right back to this Court.

That doesn’t exactly sound to me like he was making any declaration of guarantee to hear this case on the merits. Sounds more like he was insisting she get her shit straight so they could GTF on with it.

Barnett v Obama is also the same case in which Orly submitted the forged Kenyan BC that she got from convicted forger Lucas Smith as “evidence”. We’ll pick it up with Orly’s 8/1/09 court filing.

SPECIAL MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT PRE-RULE 26(f) DISCOVERY 

Well evidently Orly was soooo excited about getting her hands on Obama’s Kenyan BC, and the fact that she let her convicted felon and disbarred boy toy assistant Charles E Lincoln III draft the filing for her, it seems she neglected to follow protocol in filing that document, so Judge Nakazato issued this one page “Order”  listing all the shit she screwed up on and stated:

“It is hereby ordered that the documents shall be stricken from the record and shall not be considered by the court”

Well that pissed off Orly so she fired off another motion “Objecting to Nakazato’s action”  and of course and asking for his Recusal. (Imagine that!)

Then on 8/21/09 Judge Carter issued this order.

MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge David O. Carter

Notice the very first paragraph.

"Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Review of Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato’s August 6, 2009 Order Striking Filed Documents from the Record and Motion to Recuse Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), filed with the Court on August 18, 2009, and noticed for a hearing on September 14, 2009, at 8:30 a.m. (the “Discovery Motion”). Despite the September14, 2009 noticed hearing date, Plaintiffs request an “earlier and expedited” hearing on the Discovery Motion. Pursuant to Plaintiffs’ request, the Court hereby sets a new hearing date on the matter for Tuesday, September 8, 2009, at 8:00 a.m."

What Judge Carter did here was grant her motion to “review Nakazato’s order” striking her documents and “her” request for discovery. That is not the same thing as him actually “Ordering Discovery”. The “discovery motion” he is referring to is Taitz’s motion that Nakazato threw out for incompetent filing.

But what did Taitz do?



What a dipshit! But hay, the flying monkeys were all over that like bugs on batshit.

On Sept 4th Taitz again submitted into “evidence” the forged Kenyan BC, along with Lucas Smith’s sworn affidavit that he had personally gone to Kenya and bribed officials to get it.


Appendix Kenian Hospital Birth Certificate for Barack Obama

Boy, she’s was really cooking with gas now, and ready to blow that Kenyan usurper’s little black ass right back to Africa with this!

(Snort!)

On Sept 8th Judge Carter issued this order denying plaintiff motion for modification:

ORDER by Judge David O. Carter DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR MODIFICATION

Sept 8th was also the date of the hearing, and again thanks to Politijab and Fogbow Obots we have a report on that hearing.

Keyes v Obama - Motions Hearing - 8-SEP, 2009

From page 6 we have:

“He (Judge Carter) then started talking about having a scheduling conference with all counsel. He referenced the 12(b) 6 rule, which is the motion to dismiss. He said, "I haven't yet seen the motion. I will look at it right away. In the meantime let's proceed to talk about a scheduling conference." He then set October 5th for the Motion to Dismiss hearing, saying if that motion fails then we'll have a scheduling conference on the same day.”

On page 7

“The judge then goes back and gets everyone to agree to October 5th, at which time there will be the Motion to Dismiss and the Scheduling Conference. Then after some give and take about scheduling he said -- and waveydavey wasn't exactly perfectly clear -- but he thought motions due November 16th, like any dispositive motions in the case -- he would hear the motions on December 7th, pretrial would be January 11th, and trial would be January 26.”

Of course all of this was contingent on IF the motion to dismiss failed. But Orly goes running home to her computer and posts “HUGE NEWS! FED. JUDGE CARTER SETS TRIAL DATE FOR OBAMA’S ELIGIBILITY!!!”

Right.

The next day Judge Carter issued an “Order” - denying plaintiff’s motion for modification of Judge Nakazato’s ruling, and the motion to recuse him.

“In this case, Magistrate Judge Nakazato rejected Plaintiffs’ filing for failing to comply with the Local Rules. Plaintiffs’ Counsel admits that she failed to comply with Local Rules 7-4 and 11-3.3. However, Counsel argues that the order as a whole was erroneous because it “appears to be inconsistent with Judge David O. Carter’s oral assurances in court on July 13, 2009, that this case would be allowed to proceed on the merits without undue regard to technicalities.” Mot. at 2. This Court did not intend to suggest in the July hearing that Plaintiffs’ Counsel was being given a carte blanche to disregard the Local Rules that all attorneys before the Central District of California courts must follow. As such, Magistrate Judge Nakazato’s Order was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law and will not be modified.”

Moving right along, we get to the report on the hearing that took place on 10/5/09

Barnett v. Obama - Report on 10-5 Hearing

In this hearing Judge Carter addressed (on page 28) the issue of Taitz encouraging her flying monkeys to badger the court

“Addressing TAITZ, he said, apparently on your blog you've encouraged people to contact this court. We have had 40 to 100 calls a day. If there's any pressure, it's from you.”

And continued it on page 32

“To TAITZ he said, apparently you've encouraged people to call me on your blog. Please discourage the phone calls. They don't help. It was inappropriate for you to do that. However, it won't bear on my decision.”

(Typical Orly tactics, have the flying monkeys just badger the shit out of everyone)

On 10/29/09 Carter issued his ruling on the defendants motion to dismiss

Barnett v Obama Carter Dismisses Suit 

On page 28:

"Conduct of Plaintiffs’ Counsel The hearings have been interesting to say the least. Plaintiffs’ arguments through Taitz have generally failed to aid the Court. Instead, Plaintiffs’ counsel has favored rhetoric seeking to arouse the emotions and prejudices of her followers rather than the language of a lawyer seeking to present arguments through cogent legal reasoning. While the Court has no desire to chill Plaintiffs’ enthusiastic presentation, Taitz’s argument often hampered the efforts of her co-counsel Gary Kreep (“Kreep”), counsel for Plaintiffs Drake and Robinson, to bring serious issues before the Court. The Court has attempted to give Plaintiffs a voice and a chance to be heard by respecting their choice of counsel and by making every effort to discern the legal arguments of Plaintiffs’ counsel amongst the rhetoric. This Court exercised extreme patience when Taitz endangered this case being heard at all by failing to properly file and serve the complaint upon Defendants and held multiple hearings to ensure that the case would not be dismissed on the technicality of failure to effect service. While the original complaint in this matter was filed on January 20, 2009, Defendants were not properly served until August 25, 2009. Taitz successfully served Defendants only after the Court intervened on several occasions and requested that defense counsel make significant accommodations for her to effect service. Taitz also continually refused to comply with court rules and procedure. Taitz even asked this Court to recuse Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato on the basis that he required her to comply with the Local Rules. See Order Denying Pls.’ Mot. For Modification of Mag. J. Nakazato’s Aug. 6, 2009, Order; Denying Pls.’ Mot. to Recuse Mag. J.Nakazato; and Granting Ex Parte App. for Order Vacating Voluntary Dismissal (Sep. 8, 2009). Taitz also attempted to dismiss two of her clients against their wishes because she did not want to work with their new counsel. See id. Taitz encouraged her supporters to contact this Court, both via letters and phone calls. It was improper and unethical for her as an attorney to encourage her supporters to attempt to influence this Court's decision. Despite these attempts to manipulate this Court, the Court has not considered any outside pleas to influence the Court's decision. Additionally, the Court has received several sworn affidavits that Taitz asked potential witnesses that she planned to call before this Court to perjure themselves. This Court is deeply concerned that Taitz may have suborned perjury through witnesses she intended to bring before this Court. While the Court seeks to ensure that all interested parties have had the opportunity to be heard, the Court cannot condone the conduct of Plaintiffs’ counsel in her efforts to influence this Court.
IV. DISPOSITION Plaintiffs have expressed frustration with the notion that this case could be dismissed on separation of powers, political question, or standing grounds, asserting that these are mere “technicalities” obstructing Plaintiffs from being able to resolve the case on the merits of President Obama’s birth and constitutional qualifications. As the Supreme Court has stated, “It is indeed a singular misconception of the nature and character of our constitutional system of government to suggest that the settled distinction . . . between judicial authority over justiciable controversies and legislative power as to purely political questions tends to destroy the duty of the judiciary in proper cases to enforce the Constitution.” Pacific States Telephone & TelegraphCo. v. Oregon, 223 U.S. 118, 149-150, 32 S. Ct. 224 (1912). Interpreting the Constitution is a serious and crucial task with which the federal courts of this nation have been entrusted under Article III. However, that very same Constitution puts limits on the reach of the federal courts. One of those limits is that the Constitution defines processes through which the President can be removed from office. The Constitution does not include a role for the Court in that process. Plaintiffs have encouraged the Court to ignore these mandates of the Constitution; to disregard the limits on its power put in place by the Constitution; and to effectively overthrow a sitting president who was popularly elected by “We the People”–over sixty-nine million of the people. Plaintiffs have attacked the judiciary, including every prior court that has dismissed their claim, as unpatriotic and even treasonous for refusing to grant their requests and for adhering to the terms of the Constitution which set forth its jurisdiction. Respecting the constitutional role and jurisdiction of this Court is not unpatriotic. Quite the contrary, this Court considers commitment to that constitutional role to be the ultimate reflection of patriotism. Therefore, for the reasons stated above, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED.DATED: October 29, 2009

Wow, that really sent the batshit flying in every direction. On 11/9/09 Orly filed her motion for consideration.

Motion for Reconsideration

I guess there’s really no limit to what Taitz can pull out of her ass. On Dec 3 she followed that motion with this letter:

Letter to Judge Carter

BTW, this is a photograph of the real Roman Obama




From there, this thing goes back and forth, back and forth, accusation, gossip, hearsay, fantasy, and an entire hodgepodge of shit until Aug 11, 2010 when Taitz files this opening brief:

Appellants Opening Brief by Orly Taitz - 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
Yea, yea, yada, yada. Cutting to the gist:

“Wherefore the appellant respectfully requests: granting above appeal as requested and find for the Appellants
1. court erred in not granting Plaintiffs 05.27.09 motion for default judgment by the Plaintiffs
2. court erred in not granting 06.14.09. motion for reconsideration of 05.27.10 motion or for certification for appeal
3. court abused its judicial discretion and improperly applied pressure on Plaintiffs' counsel Taitz in demanding that she serve the defendant Obama yet again, after he was already served four times by different means, that she serve the US attorneys office for the purpose of them representing Obama, and that due to duress and intimidation applied, her consent to serve them was not valid. Absent such consent to serve the defendant again, and due to the fact that the defendant did not provide an answer to the complaint, default judgment should be entered and post default discovery needs to be ordered.
4.court erred in it‘s 10.29.2010 ruling granting defendant‘s motion to dismiss.
5. Court erred in including defamatory, slanderous inflammatory statements about the Plaintiff‘s counsel that came from some ex -parte communications of non-parties without giving the counsel an opportunity to respond and refusing any minimal inquiry into authenticity or veracity of these statements.
6.Appelants request sua sponte assignment to the independent Prosecutor and public integrity unit evidence of Obama's illegitimacy to US presidency,
5. sua sponte referral to the special prosecutor the matter of intimidation of Federal Judge David O. Carter by yet unknown individual (individuals)
6. cost and reasonable fees of appeal.”

On 10/13/10 “Appellees’ Answering Brief”  was filed requesting the District Court’s order dismissing this action be affirmed. To which Taitz responded with:

(APPEAL - 9th CIRCUIT) - 28 - (Taitz) - Filed (ECF) Appellants Opitonal Reply

Finally on March 30th 2011 the case gets scheduled for “Oral Arguments on May 2nd 2011. Taitz and Drake are each granted 10 minutes to make their case. Now how the hell Taitz will finish “her” argument in 10 minutes is beyond me, I doubt she could finish in 10 hours, especially when she is going to attempt to argue her “interpretation” of how this all went down as opposed to what the actual documentation says. It will be especially interesting if she attempts to throw in all the “Illegally Obtained”  documents she got from the Student Clearinghouse, and selective service website. But we’ll certainly see on May 2nd. Again, some of our beloved Obots from Fogbow will be in the courtroom, so we’ll get 1st hand reports on how it all goes down.

Kudo’s to the Fogbowers for that!

Make sure you stock up on popcorn and beer!


Edited to Add:
Just as a matter of potential interest, here is a chronological list of other documents/filings I’ve come across in regard to this case.



http://www.scribd.com/doc/18969903/TaitzAmendment
8.20.09 Taitz Emergency Expedited Hearing decision requested


http://www.scribd.com/doc/19121839/KEYES-v-OBAMA-47-DECLARATION-of-Gary-G-Kreep-in-support-of-EX-PARTE-APPLICATION-to-Vacate-Plaintiffs-Voluntary-Dismsisal-45-filed-by-Plaintiffs-
8.26.09


http://www.scribd.com/doc/19627869/KEYES-v-OBAMA-60-EX-PARTE-APPLICATION-for-Order-for-LIMITED-STAY-OF-DISCOVERY-cacd03108746940
9.10.09


http://www.scribd.com/doc/19742920/DOC-632-KEYES-v-OBAMA-Ltr-to-DeJute-Resig-or-Disqual-of-Kreep
9.13.09 Taitz letter to DeJute


http://www.scribd.com/doc/19759149/KEYES-v-OBAMA-64-OPPOSITION-TO-APPLICATION-FOR-LIMITED-STAY-OF-DISCOVERY-Govuscourtscacd435591640
9.14.09 Kreep opposition


http://www.scribd.com/doc/19780766/090915-LWS-Affidavit
9.15.09 Larry Sinclair Affidavit


http://www.scribd.com/doc/19783982/KEYES-v-OBAMA-65-REVISED-OPPOSITION-to-Ex-Parte-Application-for-Limited-Stay-of-Discovery-re-EX-PARTE-APPLICATION-Govuscourtscacd435591650
9.15.09 Kreep revised opposition


http://www.scribd.com/doc/19928673/KEYES-v-OBAMA-67-OPPOSITION-to-MOTION-to-Dismiss-Case-AND-MEMORANDUM-OF-POINTS-AND-AUTHORITIES-IN-SUPPORT-OF-MOTION-56-filed-by-Plaintiffs-Markh
9.18.09 Kreep Opposition


http://www.scribd.com/doc/20028663/KEYES-v-OBAMA-68-JOINT-REPORT-Rule-26-f-Discovery-Plan-filed-by-Defendants-Michelle-LR-Obama-Hillary-Rodham-Clinton-Robert-M-Gates-Joseph-R-Bid
9.21.09 Joint report filed by defendants


http://www.scribd.com/doc/21451147/Lucas-Daniel-Smith-10-12-09-new-Declaration-SACV09-00082-DOC-Anx
10.12.09 Lucas Smith Affidavit


http://www.scribd.com/doc/53477957/BARNETT-KEYES-v-OBAMA-NINTH-CIRCUIT-37-Motion-for-Additional-Time-TransportRoom-37-0
4.20.11 Taitz request for additional time


http://www.scribd.com/doc/53579087/BARNETT-KEYES-v-OBAMA-NINTH-CIRCUIT-38-Filed-clerk-order-Deputy-Clerk-BJB-TransportRoom-38-0
4.21.11 Order granting in part and denying in part request for additional time

Sunday, April 17, 2011

Speechless

You know, I spent a month last fall in Europe. I attended functions in London and Oxford that included many professionals, physicians, journalists, authors, scientists, educators, and a host of others. My Yankee Doodle accent repeatedly attracted the same question. “What’s wrong with people in the U.S.? Is it an education problem?” I had no answer. But after watching this video, I should have answered the question of “What’s wrong with people in the U.S. with; “APARRENTLY A LOT!”

There is just no hope for anyone who could swallow this load of shit.

Birtherism Abounds As Taitz Commits Fraud To Help It Along

Now that Donald Trump has jumped on the birfer bandwagon, Orly Taitz is in full birfer glory. She is just tickled shitless that her big Birfer Movement, (or big BM) has made its way to the big time, thanks to the horse’s ass Trump has been making of himself. Orly has been nothing, if not relentless in her quest to do whatever it takes to get “Barry Hussein O’SecretmuslimBama”  out of the White House. Tantrums, lawsuits, lies, fraud, forgeries, suborning perjury, slander, nothing is out of bounds as far as she is concerned.

In one of her latest upcoming lawsuits, “Taitz v. Astrue”  , Orly has stepped in batshit up to her cardboard eyelashes. She’s going after Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, for repeatedly denying her FOIA request to get all of Obama SS records. Of course the fact that it’s against the law for the SSA to release personal information on living people is beside the point.

So it seems her good buddy and fellow birfer, Col. Greg Hollister has provided her with some “illegally” obtained “ammo” to add to her case. Apparently Hollister has committed fraud by going to the Selective Service website, and using Obama’s identity to obtain a copy of Obama’s draft registration. Something Taitz has been just itching all over like a flea-infested bat for. The local news in Denver reported on that story, “here”.

These are the documents Hollister obtained.


As you can see in the 1st document the red arrow is pointed at the name of the person the document was mailed to. And that name is Barack Obama, with the address blanked out. However “raicha” over at Fogbow, being such a stellar Obot, was able to trace the address to Hollister by the zip’s barcode. Thus proving that Hollister changed Obama’s personal address in the selective service database to his own address in order to get the document mailed to his home.

Once Orly got her hands on those documents, the fact that Hollister could go to jail for fraud and identity theft for doing this was irrelevant to the cold blooded flea bitten little bat. She slapped those bad boys into an amended complaint in “Taitz v. Astrue”  and had it filed with the court, which is how the Fogbowers got hold of them in the first place.

But hay, it gets better! As it turns out, while Hollister was committing fraud in illegally obtaining Obama’s information, so was Orly. And not just as an accessory to Hollister’s fraud.

There is a non-profit organization called “National Student Clearinghouse”  , which is an academic verification resource. Its purpose is for prospective employers or other legitimate organizations to verify student degrees and enrollment information. One of many crimes Orly accuses Obama of is lying about attending Columbia University, which has been repeatedly debunked but that’s irrelevant. Orly used this resource, obtained and included in her amended complaint this little gem.






In her “Amended Complaint”  (page 8 #27) She states, “Student Clearinghouse shows even more shocking evidence”, and goes on about Obama being in Pakistan and how Pakistan was being ruled by “ruthless radical Muslims”, yada yada yada. So this is her absolute proof that Obama was actually in Pakistan for a year doing his radical Muslim scary shit training and lied to the whole country about being at Columbia during that time.

One slight problem with this, other than the fact her claims about Obama are total bullshit, is this little “Privacy Commitment”  statement from the Clearinghouse website:

“The Clearinghouse has maintained the confidentiality and privacy of records covering more than 110 million students since its inception. We are scrupulous in our concern for student privacy and compliance with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), which protects students' privacy rights in their education records.
We require certification from all verification requestors that the student or alumnus has given permission for his/her academic information to be released. Requestors also agree not to re-release degree data to third parties (unless the requestor is a background screening firm releasing data to their employer client).
The Clearinghouse only releases directory information that confirms an individual's degrees and academic credentials. We do not confirm addresses or the accuracy of Social Security Numbers provided by requestors. To further ensure security and privacy, we maintain an audit trail of requestors' identities, including Internet Protocol Addresses (IP address), credit card numbers, and telephone numbers.”

So like… Do ya think she got Obama’s permission to request this information? If not, I think she’s in deep batshit here since they not only have an audit trail, but also Taitz filed the “evidence” of her crime with the court. She even stated in her amendment that “Taitz ran a check”, and her name is right there on the document as the requester.

Orly never ceases to obtain ever-higher levels of STOOOPID. Oh I can’t wait for this to get to court, and see her try and spin this.

And it gets better still! She also took her “evidence” on “CNN”. (I shit you not)

On Wednesday Arizona passed the first Birther bill. Orly calms the credit of course, she even claims to have been in on drafting the bill, and considering what’s in it, I can easily believe that is true. You can “read the whole story here”  , and yes. it’s worth a read. Here’s a snip, (no pun intended):

“If you intend to run for president in Arizona but don't have the required birth certificate, all is not lost. The state may be willing to accept a description of your penis -- if you've got one -- as proof you were born in the U.S.
Before passing their so-called "birther" bill Wednesday, Arizona Republicans apparently decided it wasn't fair to limit proof of citizenship to the "long form birth certificate." So, they amended the measure to include several other forms of proof.”
One such document, a certificate of circumcision, is given to the parents of a male Jewish child after his foreskin is snipped.”

Again, I shit you not. Here’s a link to the “actual text”  of the bill.

So Orly, in her glorious birfer victory, (which isn’t likely to get very far) goes on CNN to talk about it. About the 8:25 mark she whips out her fraudulently obtained documents, and shortly after that goes into one of her screeching meltdowns.



Well, all I can say is that it looks like the fun is picking up in the Birferverse. And the best thing about this case is that it has been assigned to Judge Royce Lamberth. The same Judge Lamberth that tossed out Orly’s big QW case against Obama in which “he said” :

“This is one of several such suits filed by Ms. Taitz in her quixotic attempt to prove that President Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution. This Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her.”



AHHHHhahahaha

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Flipping The Birfer Tables

Well, it seems that birtherism has a new birth in question. “Trig Trutherism” is back thanks to Brad Scharlott of NKU, who has written a paper titled “Palin, The Press, and the Fake Pregnancy Rumor”, as reported by “Justin Elliott at Salon”

In truth, I think Palin probably is Trig’s mother, but frankly I don’t really care if she is or not. When the entire hubbub about “whose baby he really was” splattered back in 08 the only bit of it that I took any notice of at all was the fact that Palin claimed to have gone in labor “in Texas”. Supposedly her water had broken there and she went on to give a speech and then boarded a plane back to Alaska to give birth. With Trig being her 5th child and her water already broken I considered taking a leisurely 10-hour plane trip in labor with a special needs preemie an insane thing to do. If anything would have caused me to doubt that Palin was really Trig’s mother, that would have been it. Seriously, what kind of fool would do a stupid thing like that? (Oh… Duhhh)

What I find so hilarious about this paper is how Scharlott has demonstrated how the Trig birfer conspiracy, is not really very different from the Obama birfer conspiracy. The only real difference is the fact that the Trig birfer conspiracy, seemingly debunked by multiple reliable sources was dropped and left alone, regardless of the occasional eyebrow going up here and there. The “left” just left it be. But the Obama birfer conspiracy went absolutely ape shit, even after every single one of their birfer claims was repeatedly de-bunked by every reputable and legal authority it came up against. Even today “right-wing” idiots like Donald Trump are still out there making fools of themselves over it.

It’s just amazes me how stupid some people can be. And of course we all know Sarah Palin is far from being the sharpest tool in the shed, but the next time she asks “Why won’t Obama just release his birth certificate”, the answer should be, “He did, why won’t you release Trig’s?” Hay if she wants to play “Jump on the birfer band wagon”, I say, it ought to be thrown right back at her. Not that I doubt she’s really Trig’s mother, but because if she intends to dish it out, she ought to be able to take it. I think this little turn about on stupidity is fair play.

Brad Scharlott’s paper:

Prof. Brad Scharlott - Palin, the Press, and the Fake Pregnancy Rumor

Monday, April 11, 2011

Education Doesn’t Make Donald Trump Any Smarter Than Orly Taitz

What an ass he has made of himself! Of course I always thought he was an ass, and I guess I was right. Donald Trump and whatever that orange beast is that rides around on his head have gone full-blown birfer. (He must have gotten that thing from Harcourt Fenton Mudd) And he is displaying his ignorance of anything rational every time he opens his mouth. He’s been touting debunked birfer rumors to every news media and journalist that will listen to him.

His latest? Obama’s grandparents planted his birth announcement in the paper to get welfare benefits.



Gail Collins, Op-Ed Columist of the NYT did an article on April 1st “ Donald Trump Gets Weirder”   where she mocked Trump’s history of faux presidential campaigns and his recent birfer madness. She wrote:

“In a potential Republican field that includes Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich, it’s hard to come up with a line of attack loopy enough to stand out from the pack. But darned if Trump didn’t manage to find one.”
“Trump’s main argument for why he should be taken seriously as a presidential contender is his business success. Has Obama ever hosted a long-running reality series? Owned a bankruptcy-bound chain of casinos? Put his name on a flock of really unattractive high-rise apartment buildings? No!”

Well, Trump didn’t take kindly to that and on April 8th he “wrote a letter to the editor”: 

“As far as her comments on the so-called “birther” issue, I don't need Ms. Collins's advice. There is a very large segment of our society who believe that Barack Obama, indeed, was not born in the United States. His grandmother from Kenya stated, on tape, that he was born in Kenya and she was there to watch the birth. His family in Honolulu is fighting over which hospital in Hawaii he was born in-they just don't know.”

Yet another demonstration of his ignorance. That story was “debunked”   long ago. But hay, Trump continually brags about “being highly edjumakated” so he should have at least have the sense Gawd never gave Orly to know better than that.

So of course Gail Collins replied with “Donald Trump Strikes Back”  making an even bigger fool of Trump than he made of himself.

”Although Trump and I have had our differences in the past, I never felt it was personal. In fact, until now, I have refrained from noting that I once got an aggrieved message from him in which he misspelled the word “too.”
But about the letter. Mainly, it’s a list of alleged evidence that Barack Obama was not born in the United States. Trump has made this the centerpiece of his faux presidential campaign, falling further and further into the land of the lunatic fringe. I find this a disturbing spectacle — a little like seeing a guy you know from the neighborhood suddenly turn up in the middle of Times Square with his face painted blue and yelling about space aliens.”

Actually I believe I’ve heard some birfers also claim Obama is really a shape shifting alien, so I won’t be surprised it that’s not Trump’s next claim. He may not go to the extreme of painting his face blue, but he does walk around with that stupid looking orange tribble on his head.

Trump’s birfer claims have even sparked Dr. Chiyome Fukino, former director of Hawaii’s department of health to come forward once again to debunk the birth certificate nonsense. “In an interview with MSN”  she said:

"It’s kind of ludicrous at this point," Dr. Chiyome Fukino, the former director of Hawaii's Department of Health, said in a rare telephone interview with NBC.”
“No matter what state officials release on the issue, the "birthers" are going to question it, said Fukino. "They’re going to question the ink on which it was written or say it was fabricated," said Fukino. "The whole thing is silly."

And she would absolutely be right about that. Of course Orly Taitz is just shitting herself with joy over Trump’s birfer madness. Maybe she’ll get to be his presidential campaign manager!