Today the birfer queen is in Hawaii for the hearing of Taitz v Fuddy, and the flying monkeys are shitting themselves over what they consider her next emanate victory. (I hope they have lots of TP on hand) The original “Complaint” was filed by Taitz on August 10th in her never ending quest to force the state of Hawaii to release Obama’s original long form birth certificate.
“17. On May 2, 2011 Taitz was scheduled to appear in oral argument in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Barnett, Keyes et al v Obama 10-55084, seeking access and inspection of Mr. Obama's original 1961 long form birth certificate, kept on file in care of the defendants.
18. On April 27, 2011 only a few days before the scheduled oral argument in the Ninth Circuit court of Appeals, Mr. Obama held a public press conference, where he disclosed, what he claimed to be the certified copy of the original Birth Certificate. At the same press conference Mr. Obama attacked individuals, seeking verification of his records, calling them "side show, carnival barkers" and stating, that we have more important things to do. This appearance was certain to influence the three judge panel of Hon. Berzon, Hon. Pregerson and Hon. Fisher of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, getting ready to hear the oral argument in Barnett, Keyes v Obama and was calculated to send the message, that the original long form birth certificate was disclosed to the public and the whole issue is moot. This cheap performance by Mr. Obama was also calculated to create a mass hysteria of further persecutions and harassment of the Plaintiff and her clients.”
Of course, she’s on to him! It was just a cheap performance to harass her and her plaintiffs and derail her court case Barnett, Keys v Obama.
Well, “Carnival Barker” would be a pretty accurate description of Taitz if you ask me. At that point in time is when she went on the Internet soliciting for anyone dumb enough to come forward and claim to be a document expert and swear to the fact that the LFBC was a forgery so she could have a reason to continue her quest. Her complaint concludes:
"Wherefore Plaintiff respectfully seeks a Writ of Mandamus, advising the defendants, that:
1 Person of interest, whose long form birth certificate is sought has waived any claims of privacy by making a public disclosure of the document in question during his press conference on April 27, 2011.
2. After April 27, 2011 §338-18 no longer applies to the long form birth certificate sought and Defendants erred in refusing to allow inspection based on above statute.
3. Defendants are obligated to allow Plaintiff inspection of the long form birth certificate sought under Unified Information Practices Act chapter 92f of Hawaii Revised statutes.
4 Defendants are liable to the plaintiff for all costs and fees associated with this action."
She also wants the defendants to pay all her fees and costs cuz she spent a lot of money hauling her “experts” to Hawaii to examine the original document she had claimed she had a “court ordered subpoena” for. She didn’t actually have a court ordered anything, nor did she have the sense to call and make sure that the defendants intended to be there and comply with her imaginary subpoena when she arrived before she spent all that money in the first place. But hay, she wants them to be responsible for that cost anyway.
On September 2, 2011 Loretta Fuddy filed a “Motion to Dismiss” on the basis that Taitz was pretty much full of shit if she thought that Obama releasing his own copy of the LFBC in any way changed the fact that the state of Hawaii was still bound by state confidentially laws. As well as the fact that she had never properly served her so called subpoena in the first place, regardless of her claim to the contrary.
On September 30, 2011 Taitz posted on her website her “Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss” continuing with her crazy claim that Obama had already released it and therefore gave up any claims of privacy. She concluded with:
“For all the foregoing reasons, the undersigned respectfully requests this Honorable Court deny Defendants’ motion on the merits and/or, if there is a procedural deficiency of some kind, afford the Petitioner an opportunity to cure it.”
Yes, by all means just let her know what she screwed up and she’ll fix it, OK?
On October 7th Defendant filed a “Memorandum” in reply to Taitz’s opposition to the Motion to Dismiss. Again outlining the fact that this entire lawsuit is a hopeless waste of everyone’s time, but also made reference to Taitz’s habitual frivolous filing habits.
“C. Plaintiff has no power or authority to determine the President's eligibility.
Plaintiff makes reference to the serious questions she raises with respect to the authenticity of the President's birth certificate and her need to compare the birth certificate released by the President with the official record. Memorandum at p. 4. However, she fails to cite any power or authority that she has to determine the President's eligibility.' Plaintiff does make unsubstantiated allegations regarding her need for the records and how their release is for the public good, but these unsubstantiated allegations are similar to allegations that Plaintiff has made repeatedly in courts throughout the country and Plaintiff has repeatedly been denied the relief she desperately seeks. See Barnett v. Obama, 2009 WL 3861788, (C.D. Cal. October 29, 2009), Rhodes v. McDonald, 2010 WL 892848, (11th Cir. March 15, 2010), and Cook v. Good, 2009 WL 2163535, (M.D. Ga. 2009). On one occasion, the involved Court went so far as to order that Plaintiff pay $20,000.00 as a sanction for filing frivolous pleadings and violating Rule 11. Rhodes v. McDonald, 670 F.Supp. 2d 1363, 1382. (M.D. Ga. 2009).”
So, this case is scheduled to be heard in just a few hours from now, anyone want to bet on how it’ll end?
Motion to Dismiss: GRANTED
Motion in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss: Denied
Followed no doubt by another in the long line of Taitz’s “Motion to Reconsiders”, as she files one in every single case she looses, which so far has been ALL of them.
Luckily for us we have Fogbow Obot Mikedunford scheduled to be at the hearing so an updated report will be available this afternoon.