Monday, October 3, 2011

Orly Taitz And The Crème Da La Crème

On September 28th, Orly Taitz posted a draft of her response to the Opposition to her Motion for Reconsideration filed by the defendant in Taitz v Astrue. On September 30th the “final draft”  was docketed.

Now, I’ve seen her submit a lot of crazy shit in the last 3 years, but this is by far the “Crème da la Crème”. If this doesn’t provoke Judge Lamberth into ordering her to Show Cause as to why he shouldn’t have her sanctioned, disbarred or locked up in a padded cell I don’t know what will.

“Opposition by the defendant, Commissioner of Social Security Michael Astrue did not oppose any substantive points of the motion for reconsideration and the motion should be considered unopposed on the merits. In case the court believes, that the substantive points were addressed, the Plaintiff provides the following argument in reply to opposition and in support for motion for reconsideration.”

And it is an argument not to be believed!

“EMERGENCY SITUATION
Defendant Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security administration through his attorneys, Department of Justice-US Attorneys’ office, is claiming that the fact that Barack Obama, an individual without a valid social security number according to E-verify, is occupying the position of the U.S. President and Commander in Chief, does not represent an emergency situation and therefore there should not be a reconsideration.
In response Plaintiff herein is using Your Honors own lexicon: “They are either toying with the nation or showing their stupidity”.”

Snip

"For Michael Astrue, a licensed attorney, Commissioner of Social Security Administration; for the US attorneys, representing him, to even suggest, that there is no “legitimate public interest” in knowing whether we have a criminal in the White House with a fraudulently obtained Social Security number, is simply unthinkable, it represents a total lack of allegiance to the Constitution of the United States of America, that they were sworn to protect. This behavior by the Commissioner of the Social Security administration and US attorneys representing him, is simply criminal, it simply amounts to obstruction of justice, aiding and abetting Social Security fraud and possibly treason against the United States of America. If this is not an emergency, what is, if there is no public interest in knowing, whether we have a criminal in the White House, when is there a public interest? Can there be a more dire emergency? We have a breach of the national security in the highest office in the land, and our Department of Justice does not grasp that this is an emergency?"

Unbelievable! She has now publicly accused the Commissioner of the SSA and the U.S. Attorneys of “obstruction of justice, aiding and abetting SS fraud and “possibly” treason”.

And that’s just the beginning.

Snip

It is hard to believe that we have such an unprecedented stupidity, therefore we are left to deduct, that we have an unprecedented level of corruption in all three brunches of our government, which allows this crime to go on for nearly three years. Specifically because it is the highest level of emergency, we need Your Honor to address the evidence and reconsider the motion for summary judgment.”

Snip

“Defendant claims, that the information provided by Taitz was received by her earlier and was not submitted timely. Clearly the department of Justice suffers from a case of collective dyslexia or does not understand simple English.”

Actually if I recall correctly the Defendant did not say Taitz had “received” the information earlier, but said that it was “available” to her and the fact that she failed to discover it was just as irrelevant as this entire claim.

Snip

"In response to analytically challenged defendant, plaintiff provides an explanation yet again. Taitz provided evidence, that a person occupying the position of the President of the United States and Commander in Chief, is doing so by using a Social Security number from a state, where he never resided, which is invalid according to e-verify and SSNVS."

Analytically challenged?

“Today we are facing a de facto bankruptcy of the Social Security fund , whereby our total debt of around 14 trillion dwarfs in comparison to estimated 45-60 trillion of unfunded Social Security obligations. Not only US citizens have a legitimate interest in understanding, what is going on within the SSA, but they have a need for meaningful management of the SSA and purging of the fraudulently obtained SSA ID’s which can be used for draining the fund of its’ assets. Today, with so many blue states demonstrating a very loose approach to voter registration and HAVA compliance, there is no doubt all of these Gogol’s “Dead Souls” of SSA are voting and no doubt voting for Obama.

(Excuse me while I bust here! AAAAAhahahahaha)

Snip

“Not only this court should grant the Plaintiff’s motion and release the requested SS-5, but this court should appoint a special master or special prosecutor to investigate massive SSA fraud, which was uncovered by the Plaintiff, not only fraud committed by Obama, but also fraud committed by many others, which was not addressed and not prosecuted as of yet. If this court is serious about upholding the law and the Constitution and providing expedient and in-depth address to the issues raised, this court should consider appointing the Plaintiff herein as a special master in order to investigate not only the fraud by Obama, but also massive SSA fraud in general and massive elections fraud, which is related to the SSA fraud.”

I swear she has completely lost her mind! “If this court is serious about upholding the law”? And I KNOW she has lost her mind if she thinks Judge Lamberth would be willing to appoint her ANYTHING!

Snip

“Mr. Obama either made a mistake or did it on purpose to taunt the whole nation, to “toy” with the whole nation, using Your Honor’s lexicon, to tell us: “I can commit any crime, I can commit Social Security fraud, elections fraud, selective service fraud, IRS fraud by using a Social Security number, which was never assigned to me, and all of your officials in the Social Security administration, all of your attorneys of the US attorneys’ office, all of your congressmen and all of your judges are so corrupt, that they will simply look the other way, persecute the dissidents and attorneys -whistle-blowers and nothing will be done to me” . That is what this man saying and so far it is working for him.”

“All of your judges are so corrupt”? This no doubt includes Judge Lamberth, as he IS one of the Judges. Now I might be wrong, but I’m pretty sure this is not going to make Judge Lamberth a happy boy.

“For example, Obama in one of his speeches stated that he travelled to all 57 states. Was it an unauthorized access, was it illegal for members of the public to record his speech? Was it illegal for our members of the media to comment on it and state that this mistake might be an evidence of the fact, that in his mind he is thinking of 57 Muslim states as states where he has affinity and allegiance and not 50 U.S. states, which he is destroying with his policies? Yes, when Obama stated that he travelled to all 57 states, he probably misspoke, it was a Freudian slip, he did not intend to actually state, what was on his mind, but he did. It cannot be taken back and it is an evidence of his frame of mind.”

Snip

“Obama left behind evidence of fraud by posting a fraudulently obtained Social Security number in his tax returns. If our authorities, including the defendant Michael Astrue, commissioner of the Social Security Administration, and the Department of Justice were to do their job, and not engage in obstruction of Justice, this matter would have been discovered and criminally prosecuted years ago.”

Oh I so hope Michael Astrue goes after her ass for slander!

Snip

"The difference between Watergate and ObamaFraudGate or ObamaForgeryGate is in one simple fact: during Watergate our government actually worked, it had a notion of decency and integrity and need to be true to the oath of office to protect the Constitution, while today and for the last two and a half years our government was paralyzed by corruption."

Snip

“It is unthinkable to believe that we can have such an unprecedented level of corruption in all three branches of our government, that this court would rule, that this information is not of exigent nature and that the release of a redacted SS-5 application for this SSN is not warranted. Interest of the nation in having a legitimate president with valid identification records trumps any expectations of privacy of Mr. Obama in using a Social Security number, which he himself made public by posting it on WhiteHouse.gov and which was never legally assigned to him.”

Oh there is much, much more lunacy at the link above and certainly worth a read. I swear this has to be the most blatantly disrespectful and outrageous thing Taitz has ever filed. It is nothing more than grandstanding for her flying monkeys to prove herself to be “The Great Lady Liberty” the righteous defender of America.

Well attention whore that she is, I guarantee that this pile of shit will get her some attention. Though I seriously doubt she’s going to like the Judges reply.

Popcorn….check

Beer….check


No, scratch that! We just might need the smoked salmon and Champaign for this one!

1 comment:

  1. Dear Ms. Daisy,

    Your post makes for VERY intersting reading...

    ... but I can't help but ask, "What if Taitz claims are true? ... What then?"

    As lunatic as she might be (and I'm NOT saying that I agree with you on this point), and as much as she might be attempting to get her "15 minutes of fame", I'm not sure that it is that simple...

    So, again, I say, "What if her claims are true?"

    Here's something for you, Mr. Astrue isn't likely to "sue for slander" ... Allegations made in the course of a Court proceeding are not slanderous...

    In any event, the best defence to a slander suit, is proof of the statement...

    And, on that point, there are other instances of questionable behaviour that might demonstrate the systemic corruption that she gave but one example of...

    And whether the Judge is angered or not had better not influence his opinion... If we have to pander submissive to anyone's possible reaction to our outrage, then all is lost and you might as well scrap our Constitution... and that would be a terrible shame.

    Anyway, "Ms. Daisy" ... you had the "podium" of an anonymous internet website...

    Keep on "blasting away"...

    ReplyDelete