I swear, I’ve seen a lot of stupid people in my life but Orly Taitz takes the cake. She has without doubt achieved the level of “stick a fork in the light socket” stupid. Following our last post, “Orly Taitz Gets Her Ass Kicked Again” where we discussed Judge Lamberth dismissing Orly’s case Taitz v Astrue “with prejudice” and his famous footnote #4 which read in part:
"The Selective Service does not release registration acknowledgment forms to the public; only a registrant himself can request proof of his registration. See Registration Information, http://www.sss.gov/ack.htm. The Court can only conclude that plaintiff has submitted a form that some individual obtained through a false request and subsequently posted online."
“Anyone who knowingly and willfully uses SSNVS to request or obtain information from SSA under false pretenses violates Federal law and may be punished by a fine, imprisonment or both.” As with the registration acknowledgement form discussed above, the Court can only conclude that plaintiff has submitted a page that some individual obtained under false pretenses—that is, by representing himself as the President’s employer. The Court notes that both documents submitted by plaintiff are incomplete; the address on the registration acknowledgment form and the employer identification number on the SSNVS page have been blacked out, further confirming the documents’ fraudulent origins. For all of these reasons, the Court will disregard both documents as well as any arguments made in reliance on them.”
Orly decided to file a “Motion for Reconsideration” , and on her website she announced on 9/1/11 that she would post the “unredacted” motion on her website on 9/8/11 after Obama made his Jobs speech, and she did. I don’t know, maybe she thought doing so at that specific time would severely upset and “upstage” Obama, the way she was upset and upstaged by his releasing his long form birth certificate and killing Osama bin Laden just days before her big oral hearing in “Barnett v Obama” on 5/2/11. And of course, Obama really has nothing more important to do than plan sneak attacks on Orly Taitz!
Her motion was finally docketed 9/13/11
“Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. (Hereinafter “Taitz”) submits this motion for reconsideration and respectfully requests emergency hearing and oral argument on the merits within 20 days, based on newly discovered information and based on an assertion of clear error and manifest injustice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). This motion is based on the instant Memorandum of points and authorities, exhibits herein, and any matters present at oral argument.”
So, what could this “new evidence” be?
“After Taitz submitted her opposition to motion for summary judgment, she appeared on a number of radio shows. During one of the shows, talk show host, Mr. Doug Hagmann, who is also a private investigator, related to Taitz that when Mr. Obama originally posted his tax returns on WhiteHouse.gov, he left his full Social Security number on one of the pages, and it was the same Connecticut social security number which is listed in the sworn affidavits of investigators Sankey, Daniels and Sampson which were previously submitted to this court.
Originally, as the tax returns were posted an employee who posted them did not “flatten” the file. What it meant is that if any person were to open this file in Adobe illustrator computer application, this person could see layers of alterations made to the file. It showed on page 43 of Obama's 2009 return a full unredacted social security number, that started with 042. (See attached.Exhibit 1(a) and exhibit 1(b))"
“The moment this information was posted on the White House official web site it became public knowledge. It was not done by any illegal activity of the Plaintiff, it was done by Barack Obama himself or one of his employees, who was authorized by Obama to post this tax return on the web. Taitz did not force Obama to post his full unredacted SSN on line. This number became public record.”
“The number that was posted was xxx-xx-4425. This is the same Connecticut SSN that according to licensed investigators Susan Daniels, Neil Sankey and retired deportation officer John Sampson, Obama was using, and the same number, which according to e-verify was never assigned to Obama. (Exhibit 2 hereto, the “Affidavit of Linda Jordan” discussed below).
This startling recently discovered evidence is consistent with prior evidence showing that White House employees originally did not flatten the computer file they posted on April 27, 2011 which showed clear evidence of forgery in the computer image of Obama's alleged 1961 typewritten long form birth certificate. (Exhibit 4, hereto.)”
“How could a White House employee leave such incriminating evidence visible to the public at large and not once, but twice? Maybe, it is a case of simple negligence of an employee, maybe, because there is so much fraud and forgery in most of Obama’s records, that such signs of forgery were bound to appear at some point and become available to the public at large. Maybe, this employee of the White House was warning the public.”
Sure that had to be it, it was a warning to the public, right!
“It is not “bare suspicion” under the present circumstances to charge that when one does not have a valid birth certificate, one needs to resort to use of a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number of an elderly individual from a State where one has never resided, an individual whose death was not recorded. All of the above provides evidence that indeed the most egregious fraud was committed upon each and every U.S. citizen and on the United States of America as a whole.”
Wow, that’s some real serious hardcore undisputable evidence there. But it gets even better!
"b. … and also regarding the selective service website information:
This court misunderstood and misinterpreted the evidence provided in regards to the selective service official website www.sss.gov.
This court erroneously believed, that a person can check only his own registration. That is not the case. www.sss.gov is a public website. In order to clarify the matter Taitz provides her declaration (Exhibit 2(a), (b) and (c). Affidavit of Taitz and printout from official web site of Selective Service).
Taitz provides a printout of online verification, Exhibit 2(a)."
Yes, by all means lets get right to that affidavit.
"AFFIDAVIT OF ORLY TAITZ
1. I, Orly Taitz, am over 18 years old, I am an attorney, licensed in the state of California and admitted in all courts of California, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals and Supreme Court of the United States. I have personal knowledge of the facts described below and I can competently testify at trial to the following:
2. I received information from licensed investigators Sankey and Daniels as well as recently retired senior deportation officer John Sampson, that for most of his life Barack Obama used and is currently using a Connecticut social security number XXX-XX-4425.
3. The first three digits of the number 042 were assigned by the Social Security administration to the state of Connecticut.
4. Based on information and belief, Obama was never a resident of Connecticut.
5. Concerned that we have an individual fraudulently using a stolen social security number from a state, where he never resided, I decided to verify this information through official sources of the U.S. government.
6. I went on the official website for the U.S. government www.sss.gov. This website provides verification of the Selective Service registration with the U.S. military.
7. One cannot occupy an executive position with the U.S. government without such registration with the Selective Service.
8. For verification one is supposed to enter the name, birthdate and social security number of the individual. If all three parameters match to the identification information on file, it will show "Matched record".
9. I personally entered name "Obama", birthdate 08.04.1961 and social security number XXX-XX-4425, given to me by investigators Sankey, Daniels and Sampson.
10. I got a response "Matched record" . selective service number 61-1125539- 1. Date of registration 9.4.1980.
11. From birth and until date of registration Obama was not a resident of Connecticut.
12. I also received a sworn affidavit from expert Chito Papa, showing, that Barack Obama is using the same Connecticut social security number XXX-XX-4425 on his 2009 tax returns, which were posted on the official web site WhiteHouse.gov. This tax return was later reposted with the file flattened and the social security number electronically whitened, however the original file with the visible social security number was downloaded by Mr. Papa and multiple other individuals. A true and correct copy of such affidavit is attached herein.
13. I also received a sworn affidavit from Ms. Linda Jordan. A true and correct copy of such affidavit is attached herein.
12. As an attorney and officer of the court I declare under penalty of perjury, that above is true and correct statement of the facts. As an officer of the court I am requesting an immediate hearing on this matter, as it shows that we have an unprecedented breach of the U.S. National security, we have an individual with a fraudulently obtained Social Security number from a state, where he never resided, occupying the position of the President of the United States and Commander-in-chief.
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq."
And her evidence that accessing Obama’s Selective Service records was not a crime? She submits a screen shot of “This Page” from SSS website on page 31 of her motion that states:
“Selective Service Online Registration Verification
This service allows you to look up a man's Selective Service number, as well as the date he registered. Enter a last name, social security number, and date of birth for the registered man, and click on "Submit."
Only registrations of men born on or after January 1, 1960, can be verified through this system. To obtain Selective Service information about men born earlier, CLICK HERE and follow the instructions on our "Records" page."
But what she neglected to submit, or probably neglected to even read herself was the privacy statement. After all that’s just legal mumbo jumbo and a “Great KONstitutional Attorney” like Orly Taitz doesn’t need to bother with such trifles as that. But lets take a look for ourselves, just for fun. On the SSS website the “Privacy Statement” states:
*What are Your Rights Under the Privacy Act of 1974?
The Privacy Act of 1974 protects the personal information the federal government keeps on you in "systems of records (SOR).”
The Act's major provisions require agencies to:
Publish a Privacy Act Notice in the Federal Register explaining the existence, character, and uses of a new or revised SOR;
Keep information about you accurate, relevant, timely, and complete to assure fairness in dealing with you; and
Allow you to, upon request, access and review your information held in a SOR."
And if we refer to the Privacy Act itself under “Conditions of Disclosure to Third Parties” (which Taitz would defiantly be, since she is not in fact President Obama) the first item we find is this:
“A: The "No Disclosure Without Consent" Rule
"No agency shall disclose any record which is contained in a system of records by any means of communication to any person, or to another agency, except pursuant to a written request by, or with the prior written consent of, the individual to whom the record pertains”
Imagine that! So in essence what Orly has done is admit to the court, “under penalty of prudery” that she has in fact impersonated the President of the United States and by entering “his personal information” did fraudulently accessed his selective service records. I mean seriously, how blatantly fucking stupid can she be?
On page 36 of the motion is her affidavit from Linda Jordan who states, (also “under penalty of perjury”):
“I used the government run E-Verify System to verify the employment eligibility for Barack H Obama”.
“I considered myself to be one of the employers of the President of the United States.”
Now, what was that Judge Lamberth was saying about the Court concluding “that plaintiff has submitted a page that some individual obtained under false pretenses—that is, by representing himself as the President’s employer”?
Another “earth shattering” bit of new evidence that Orly has submitted is this little jewel:
“On August 29, 2011 Mail on Line, The Australian, The Washington Times, and many other papers and radio shows around the world reported on an arrest of Barack Obama's uncle Omar Obama, who was in U.S. Illegally, and was ordered deported from the United States.”
“This new information shows a pattern of Social security fraud committed by multiple members of Obama's family. It, also, shows misconduct and recklessness of employees of Social Security Administration at best or criminal complicity at worst in allowing illegal use of Social Security numbers. This is an additional factor, that shows, that release of SS-5 for the number in question is warranted, as it shows illegal conduct by a number of members of Obama's family, who are recipients of the SSNs, which warrants release of SS-5 not only for Connecticut number that Obama is using, but also of SS-5's for the social security numbers of his illegal alien relatives Omar Obama and Zeituni Obama.”
She really has this evidence thing down pat doesn’t she? (Eyes Roll!)
Lawdy lawd, I can’t wait to see what Judge Lamberth has to say when he responds to this!