Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Orly Taitz Is Taking Her Demands To D.C.

As mentioned in the last post Orly was bragging and basking in the glory of her big victory in visiting D.C. as she relayed “her version” of the events of her trip to the flying monkeys. It has also always been her habit to post about all of the interviews she gives, so the FM’s can see how successful and sought after she is by the media. (Oh, AND how famous she is, that’s very important for everyone to know.) Well, her post D.C. trip interviews have hit the intertubes.

At Salon.com Justin Elliott posted on September 26th: “Top GOP staffers huddle with Birther activist”

“President Obama released his long-form birth certificate months ago, but leading Birther activist Orly Taitz is still insisting to anyone who will listen that the president is not a natural-born citizen. Last Thursday she traveled to Capitol Hill to make her pitch to staffers for some of the most influential conservative members of Congress, some of whom were apparently quite receptive to her message.”

He went on to relay what Taitz had claimed of the positive reactions she had received and about her goal to “testify at a congressional committee about her never-ending legal crusade to prove the president is not a natural-born citizen.” But Justin just didn’t take her at “her” word and leave it at that, he called the folks she claimed to have spoken to and got…. “The rest of the story”.

“UPDATE: Brian Phillips, communications director for Sen. Mike Lee, sends this note about his office's encounter with Taitz:
Mrs. Taitz did not "meet" with our office in the widely understood sense. She arrived at our office unannounced and requested to speak with someone about a "homeland security" issue. She was afforded five minutes with a staffer. Once it was clear that her issue did not reflect one of critical national security importance, she was thanked and the meeting ended.
UPDATE II: Allen West's spokeswoman tells me that Taitz's account of her conversation with West's chief of staff is "absolutely false." The spokeswoman also points to West's statement to Birthers that they should focus on Obama's policies rather than his citizenship status.
Meanwhile, an aide to Rubio tells Ben Smith: "Senate staff regularly meet with a wide range of people, including people we disagree with as was the case here."

Well, there you have it. But slapping Orly with the truth does little to deter her. Unless they are speaking “Orly Truth”, they are corrupt and just trying to cover up her version of the “real truth” and persecute her for attempting to expose it.

In addition to her posting repeated demands that she should be allowed to testify before a congressional committee about this, she is also instructing her FMs step by step on how to write letters, make phone calls and make those same demands on her behalf. But she does advise them not to waste their time on the “legal stuff.”

"What to write and how to write, don’t waste time on lengthy research findings
Posted on September 27, 2011
When you write to the senators and representatives, don’t waste their time with lengthy legal research, it will go over their heads. We’ll deal with it later. At this time we need something very short and simple."

It’s over their heads and she’s been attempting to deal with the legal stuff for 3 years, and just can’t seem to get it right for love nor money.

"Demand criminal investigation of the SSN fraud. Most governmental officials, including our representatives and senators will not go into details of analysing Minor v Happersett and other precedents, don’t waste your time and their time with lengthy letters. Most of them are too lazy, too brain dead and too gutless to look at more than a couple of pages and react on something flagrantly illegal. SSN fraud is clear on its’ face by looking at a couple of docs."

Yes, by all means I hope they all include the fact that Orly has referred to them all as “lazy, brain dead, and gutless”.

“When you write to your reps and senators do as follows:
1. check what committees are they on
2. copy my latest motion with Obama’s Tax return, selective service and e-verify
3. Write a very short letter demanding to allow me to testify at their committee due to the fact, that the person occupying the position of the President and issuing executive order affecting their committee does no have valid identification number according to e-verify
4. send it by traceable mail: certified mail or FedEx, fax with confirmation and follow up with a visit to their home office or phone calls until you get their signature allowing me to testify.
Thank you for all your help. Together we will be able to end this crime of the century”

Wow, the “crime of the century”! (Do ya think they’ll make a movie? Maybe we should call Mel Brooks!) Anyway, it sounds simple enough for the simple minded who are stupid enough to attempt it. But just to make sure she gets her big shot at “testifying” she sent her own letter.

"Letter to Human Rights commission of the US House of representatives
Posted on September 27, 2011
As you are well aware, United States of America was found guilty of violation of human rights, specifically electoral rights, by the Inter American Commission on Human rights in relation to the issue of lack of electoral rights of voting for Congress for residents of Washington DC.
Unfortunately today citizens of the United States of America are subjected to a substantially more egregious violation of human rights and you are requested to intervene and abate this violation of electoral rights and due process rights."

Yes, PLEEEEASE intervene and let her testify!!!

"Please see attached pleadings from Taitz v Astrue, 11-402 USDC District of Columbia, specifically motion for reconsideration and reply from the Department of Justice, representing Commissioner for Social Security Michael Astrue. Attached pleadings provide undisputable proof that the President of the United states Barack Hussein Obama is using in his tax returns and his Selective Service registration a Connecticut Social Security number XXX-XX-4425, (redacted by CIP) which was never assigned to him according to E-verify, as well as the fact, that the alleged long form birth certificate, that he posted on WhiteHouse.gov, is nothing but a computer generated forgery according to multiple experts."

Actually none of her pleadings have ever contained a speck of any kind of actual evidence, only hearsay and allegations. The fact that Obama changed his SSN some years ago would certainly account for the fact that her E-Verify doesn’t friggin match! And even the SSA states that the 1st 3 digits of the SSN cannot be relied upon as absolute proof of where someone was “supposedly” living when it was issued. Blocks of numbers were issued to different states, but they often shifted those numbers around according to need. But you can’t tell birfers that, they don’t care. Reality is not a state their brains are capable of achieving.

"I, Orly Taitz, am a plaintiff in above legal action. I am a president of a not for profit “Defend Our freedoms” foundation, I am a civil rights attorney and a doctor of dental surgery. For the last three years I encountered the most flagrant violations of human rights in the United States of America in relation to this issue. I encountered obstruction of justice, manipulation of dockets, tampering with evidence, committed by the employees of courts, stonewalling by judges, persecutions by judges, persecutions and slander by members of our “main stream” manipulated media and total dismantling of any meaningful electoral rights for the US citizens, who are demanding most basic rights: a right to be governed by a legitimate US president, who possesses valid identification papers and who is Constitutionally eligible. I witnessed total annihilation of a meaningful right of due process and a right of redress of grievances in relation to this issue, as well as persecution of myself and other dissidents, who dare to bring forward this issue."

Actually those are pretty slanderous accusations, accusing the courts of obstruction of justice, manipulating dockets and evidence, none of which she is capable of substantiating. Of course fraud, slander, and flat out lies are her M.O. Sooner or later she will be answering for it.

"Based on the above I am respectfully requesting a right to testify before Tom Lantos Human rights commission. As you know Congressman Tom Lantos was a holocaust survivor, who acutely felt any violation of human rights. I am a descendant of survivors of pogromi, holocaust and persecution of marranos."

Oh right, they’re both Jews, that’ll really influence them; they’re sure to let her testify now!

"I was appalled and disgusted at the level of persecution of dissidents against Obama regime, which culminated when I ran for secretary of state of California in the Republican primary. One of the greatest violators was the staff of MSNBC, when on the election day MSNBC host Chris Mathews announced in prime time “Orly Taitz is a malignancy. I want you to tie her up like a witch to the stake. She needs to be tied up like a witch to the stake.” After this call to arms multiple insane brainwashed Obama supporters sent me e-mails stating that I need to be burned at the stake. Previously my car was tampered with. some Obama supporters paid and commissioned an artist to paint demeaning nude pictures of me under the title “Birther Orly Taitz” and posted those pictures all over the Internet, in local papers and sent them to my three children."

And they’re STLL being mean to her and she’s getting damn sick and tired of it. EVERYONE is supposed to accept her evidence as Gospel, and praise her for being the savior of the country.

"This slander and call for violence against me was issued simply because I dared to represent members of the US military, State Representatives and former UN ambassador Alan Keyes in legal actions challenging Obama’s legitimacy to the US presidency in light of his lack of a valid Social security number, lack of a valid (no forged) birth certificate and lack of constitutional eligibility under article 2 of the US Constitution."

Right cuz she’s the ONLY person in this country that has (as she frequently likes to remind people) “The strength of character” to stand up to this entirely corrupt country.

"Half a million citizens defined our corrupt establishment and corrupt media and voted for me. If more than half a million people voted for me in one primary in one state, it means that I have a lot of support all over the country, it means that support for the cause that I champion is in the millions."

Actually it just proves that there are people who vote that don’t necessarily know who or what they are voting for, they just pick a name.

"It is time for the US Congress and particularly the Commission for Human Rights to show a drop of integrity and address the issue of criminality of Barack Obama, his lack of any valid identification papers, this utter embarrassment for the United States and electoral and due process violations of the Human Rights in the US.
Respectfully submitted
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ"

And she has nerve to speak of “integrity” and “utter embarrassments”?

Maybe it’s all as I said in the last post, she knows full well that her cases are all about to be thrown out of court and she’s desperately trying anything she can think of to keep herself relevant.

Not that she ever really was relevant in the first place.

Sunday, September 25, 2011

The Crazy Daze Of Tin Foil Taitz Continues…

It seems Orly’s been a busy little bat lately since her admission of fraud in our last post. After soliciting her flying monkeys to set her up with meetings in D.C. with as many Congressional officials as possible, as well as urging them all to download her pleadings and send them to everyone from Sheriff Joe in Arizona to Congressman, Senators and even Gawd him/her/itself, she gets ready to head to Washington. On September 21st she proudly posted on her website that she would be leaving for D.C. and would be “having 5 congressional meetings” the next day. Boy the flying monkeys were so proud of their Queen and this tremendous success.

When she returned home she posted that she had forwarded all of her information on Social security fraud to “12 high ranking senators and congressmen and had personal in depth meetings with legal counsel, chiefs of staff and senior advisers for 4 high ranking senators and 3 representatives: Senator Tom Coburn-ranking member of the subcommittee on privacy on senate judicial committee, Senator Jim Inhofe, Senator Marco Rubio, Congressman Lamar Smith-chair f the House Judiciary committee, Congressman Allen West, Congressman Steven King.” She also claimed that some of the chiefs of staff and their legal counsel would work together in arranging for her to testify at one of the committee or subcommittee hearings, and that she should hear from them within a week.

This of course had the praise rolling in as Orly basked in the glory of it. However I’d be willing to bet that in truth, she never got passed the reception staff that no doubt busted guts laughing at her and her insanity probably before she even had the doors shut behind her as she left. Unfortunately her excitement over this big success was quickly shoved aside as she received notice that the Defense in Taitz v Astrue had the nerve to file an “Opposition to her Motion to Reconsider”. 

“Plaintiff cannot establish the extraordinary circumstances necessary to justify relief under Rule 59(e). Plaintiff presents no previously unavailable evidence that justifies revisiting the Court’s conclusion. And plaintiff fails to identify any clear error or manifest injustice in the Court’s order. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration should therefore be denied.”

It goes on to outline the legal incompetence of her Motion to Reconsider and requests that her motion be denied. Of course now that this opposition has been filed it’s likely that Judge Lamberth will rule very soon to grant this opposition and deny (hopefully with sanctions and even possible charges) her Motion to Reconsider. Once that is done, her case in Hawaii against Loretta Fuddy that never had a snowballs chance in the first place will be toast. (Actually it was toast the minute she filled it, just like everything else she has ever filed.) She quickly posted:

“US Department of Injustice: having a criminal with a stolen Social Security number-is not an extraordinary circumstance, Obama’s right to privacy to use a stolen SSN supercedes the right of 311 million American citizens to know, if we have a legitimate President and have a fraud and a criminal removed from the WH.
Posted on September 23, 2011
Taitz v Astrue opposition to motion for reconsideration
Please, forward my motion for reconsideration with all the exhibits and the response from the Department of Injustice to every congressman and demand they write letters to chairmen and ranking members of House and Senate Judiciary committees and subcommittees on privacy and demand to invite me to the committee hearings and testify on ObamaForgeryGate and ObamaSSNfraudGate and subpoena records, subpoena attendance of Judge Lamberth, Judge Puglisi, judge Nishimura, Judge Clay D. Land, commissioner Astrue, director of Health Fuddy, registrar Onaka an demand answers from all of them.”

YES damn it! DEMAND they invite her to testify! And subpoena all those damn corrupt Obot Judges and Hawaiian officials who have dared to oppose her and DEMAND they answer WHY WHY WHY they continue to deny her delusions and make her look like the legally incompetent insaniack she really is!

"This is complete lawlessness, this is worse than the Soviet Union, Libya and Iran taken together. This answer from the Department of Justice de facto tells every American citizen: “You are nothing but a dumb slave, we can do absolutely everything and anything to you”. I hope every American citizen is livid and up in arms in the face of this flagrant injustice and flagrant abdication of the most basic constitutional rights of the US citizens."

Oooo, getting a little testy here! Maybe she’s finally getting tired of being such a total failure. (But I doubt it; she is after all also a serious narcissistic publicity whore, and any attention negative or not is better than nothing at all.) She has been claiming “victory any minute now” for over 2 years. In September of 09 she was bragging to the world that she “would have Obama out of office in 30 days”. It’s been 730 days. He’s still there, and she’s still the chronic loser she’s always been.

"Please, forward to me copies of your letters to your representatives and senators. Please, follow up with the phone calls to their home and DC offices, please visit their offices and don’t get off the phone and don’t get out of the office until you get an answer, and don’t take no for an answer. Call Eric Holder, Robert Mueller, your state Attorney Generals, Sheriffs and Governors. This outrage has to end now.”

Yes by all means, call them all at home and tell them that Orly told you to! That’ll surely make them bow down before her!

Well, she’s right about one thing. This outrage does have to end, and I have no doubt that Judge Lamberth will at least put an end to these ridiculous court cases PDQ! The tossing out of Taitz v Ruemmler will probably quickly follow that.

You know Orly has been touting the fact that she escaped the corruption and oppression of communist Russia ever since she came here. But to hear her tell it the U.S. is a million times worse, you know since every single person AND entity in it are nothing but no good treasonous Obot thugs, except her flying monkeys of course. So I wonder when she’ll decide to escape here? I’ll tell you one thing, if I lived in a place that I hated as much as Orly Taitz hates the United States of America, I’d just get the fuck OUT!

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Orly Taitz Admits Fraud In Sworn Statement To The Court

I swear, I’ve seen a lot of stupid people in my life but Orly Taitz takes the cake. She has without doubt achieved the level of “stick a fork in the light socket” stupid. Following our last post, “Orly Taitz Gets Her Ass Kicked Again”  where we discussed Judge Lamberth dismissing Orly’s case Taitz v Astrue “with prejudice” and his famous footnote #4 which read in part:


"The Selective Service does not release registration acknowledgment forms to the public; only a registrant himself can request proof of his registration. See Registration Information, http://www.sss.gov/ack.htm. The Court can only conclude that plaintiff has submitted a form that some individual obtained through a false request and subsequently posted online."


“Anyone who knowingly and willfully uses SSNVS to request or obtain information from SSA under false pretenses violates Federal law and may be punished by a fine, imprisonment or both.” As with the registration acknowledgement form discussed above, the Court can only conclude that plaintiff has submitted a page that some individual obtained under false pretenses—that is, by representing himself as the President’s employer. The Court notes that both documents submitted by plaintiff are incomplete; the address on the registration acknowledgment form and the employer identification number on the SSNVS page have been blacked out, further confirming the documents’ fraudulent origins. For all of these reasons, the Court will disregard both documents as well as any arguments made in reliance on them.”

Orly decided to file a “Motion for Reconsideration” , and on her website she announced on 9/1/11 that she would post the “unredacted” motion on her website on 9/8/11 after Obama made his Jobs speech, and she did. I don’t know, maybe she thought doing so at that specific time would severely upset and “upstage” Obama, the way she was upset and upstaged by his releasing his long form birth certificate and killing Osama bin Laden just days before her big oral hearing in “Barnett v Obama” on 5/2/11. And of course, Obama really has nothing more important to do than plan sneak attacks on Orly Taitz!

Her motion was finally docketed 9/13/11

“Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. (Hereinafter “Taitz”) submits this motion for reconsideration and respectfully requests emergency hearing and oral argument on the merits within 20 days, based on newly discovered information and based on an assertion of clear error and manifest injustice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). This motion is based on the instant Memorandum of points and authorities, exhibits herein, and any matters present at oral argument.”

So, what could this “new evidence” be?


“After Taitz submitted her opposition to motion for summary judgment, she appeared on a number of radio shows. During one of the shows, talk show host, Mr. Doug Hagmann, who is also a private investigator, related to Taitz that when Mr. Obama originally posted his tax returns on WhiteHouse.gov, he left his full Social Security number on one of the pages, and it was the same Connecticut social security number which is listed in the sworn affidavits of investigators Sankey, Daniels and Sampson which were previously submitted to this court.
Originally, as the tax returns were posted an employee who posted them did not “flatten” the file. What it meant is that if any person were to open this file in Adobe illustrator computer application, this person could see layers of alterations made to the file. It showed on page 43 of Obama's 2009 return a full unredacted social security number, that started with 042. (See attached.Exhibit 1(a) and exhibit 1(b))"


The moment this information was posted on the White House official web site it became public knowledge. It was not done by any illegal activity of the Plaintiff, it was done by Barack Obama himself or one of his employees, who was authorized by Obama to post this tax return on the web. Taitz did not force Obama to post his full unredacted SSN on line. This number became public record.”


“The number that was posted was xxx-xx-4425. This is the same Connecticut SSN that according to licensed investigators Susan Daniels, Neil Sankey and retired deportation officer John Sampson, Obama was using, and the same number, which according to e-verify was never assigned to Obama. (Exhibit 2 hereto, the “Affidavit of Linda Jordan” discussed below).
This startling recently discovered evidence is consistent with prior evidence showing that White House employees originally did not flatten the computer file they posted on April 27, 2011 which showed clear evidence of forgery in the computer image of Obama's alleged 1961 typewritten long form birth certificate. (Exhibit 4, hereto.)”

Her conclusion?

“How could a White House employee leave such incriminating evidence visible to the public at large and not once, but twice? Maybe, it is a case of simple negligence of an employee, maybe, because there is so much fraud and forgery in most of Obama’s records, that such signs of forgery were bound to appear at some point and become available to the public at large. Maybe, this employee of the White House was warning the public.”

Sure that had to be it, it was a warning to the public, right!

“It is not “bare suspicion” under the present circumstances to charge that when one does not have a valid birth certificate, one needs to resort to use of a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number of an elderly individual from a State where one has never resided, an individual whose death was not recorded. All of the above provides evidence that indeed the most egregious fraud was committed upon each and every U.S. citizen and on the United States of America as a whole.

Wow, that’s some real serious hardcore undisputable evidence there. But it gets even better!

"b. … and also regarding the selective service website information:
This court misunderstood and misinterpreted the evidence provided in regards to the selective service official website www.sss.gov.
This court erroneously believed, that a person can check only his own registration. That is not the case. www.sss.gov is a public website. In order to clarify the matter Taitz provides her declaration (Exhibit 2(a), (b) and (c). Affidavit of Taitz and printout from official web site of Selective Service).
Taitz provides a printout of online verification, Exhibit 2(a)."

Yes, by all means lets get right to that affidavit.

1. I, Orly Taitz, am over 18 years old, I am an attorney, licensed in the state of California and admitted in all courts of California, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals and Supreme Court of the United States. I have personal knowledge of the facts described below and I can competently testify at trial to the following:
2. I received information from licensed investigators Sankey and Daniels as well as recently retired senior deportation officer John Sampson, that for most of his life Barack Obama used and is currently using a Connecticut social security number XXX-XX-4425.
3. The first three digits of the number 042 were assigned by the Social Security administration to the state of Connecticut.
4. Based on information and belief, Obama was never a resident of Connecticut.
5. Concerned that we have an individual fraudulently using a stolen social security number from a state, where he never resided, I decided to verify this information through official sources of the U.S. government.
6. I went on the official website for the U.S. government www.sss.gov. This website provides verification of the Selective Service registration with the U.S. military.
7. One cannot occupy an executive position with the U.S. government without such registration with the Selective Service.
8. For verification one is supposed to enter the name, birthdate and social security number of the individual. If all three parameters match to the identification information on file, it will show "Matched record".
9. I personally entered name "Obama", birthdate 08.04.1961 and social security number XXX-XX-4425, given to me by investigators Sankey, Daniels and Sampson.
10. I got a response "Matched record" . selective service number 61-1125539- 1. Date of registration 9.4.1980.
11. From birth and until date of registration Obama was not a resident of Connecticut.
12. I also received a sworn affidavit from expert Chito Papa, showing, that Barack Obama is using the same Connecticut social security number XXX-XX-4425 on his 2009 tax returns, which were posted on the official web site WhiteHouse.gov. This tax return was later reposted with the file flattened and the social security number electronically whitened, however the original file with the visible social security number was downloaded by Mr. Papa and multiple other individuals. A true and correct copy of such affidavit is attached herein.
13. I also received a sworn affidavit from Ms. Linda Jordan. A true and correct copy of such affidavit is attached herein.
12. As an attorney and officer of the court I declare under penalty of perjury, that above is true and correct statement of the facts. As an officer of the court I am requesting an immediate hearing on this matter, as it shows that we have an unprecedented breach of the U.S. National security, we have an individual with a fraudulently obtained Social Security number from a state, where he never resided, occupying the position of the President of the United States and Commander-in-chief.
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq."

And her evidence that accessing Obama’s Selective Service records was not a crime? She submits a screen shot of “This Page”  from SSS website on page 31 of her motion that states:

“Selective Service Online Registration Verification
This service allows you to look up a man's Selective Service number, as well as the date he registered. Enter a last name, social security number, and date of birth for the registered man, and click on "Submit."
Only registrations of men born on or after January 1, 1960, can be verified through this system. To obtain Selective Service information about men born earlier, CLICK HERE and follow the instructions on our "Records" page."

But what she neglected to submit, or probably neglected to even read herself was the privacy statement. After all that’s just legal mumbo jumbo and a “Great KONstitutional Attorney” like Orly Taitz doesn’t need to bother with such trifles as that. But lets take a look for ourselves, just for fun. On the SSS website the Privacy Statement” states:

*What are Your Rights Under the Privacy Act of 1974?
The Privacy Act of 1974 protects the personal information the federal government keeps on you in "systems of records (SOR).”
The Act's major provisions require agencies to:
Publish a Privacy Act Notice in the Federal Register explaining the existence, character, and uses of a new or revised SOR;
Keep information about you accurate, relevant, timely, and complete to assure fairness in dealing with you; and
Allow you to, upon request, access and review your information held in a SOR."

And if we refer to the Privacy Act itself under “Conditions of Disclosure to Third Parties”  (which Taitz would defiantly be, since she is not in fact President Obama) the first item we find is this:

“A: The "No Disclosure Without Consent" Rule
"No agency shall disclose any record which is contained in a system of records by any means of communication to any person, or to another agency, except pursuant to a written request by, or with the prior written consent of, the individual to whom the record pertains”

Imagine that! So in essence what Orly has done is admit to the court, “under penalty of prudery” that she has in fact impersonated the President of the United States and by entering “his personal information” did fraudulently accessed his selective service records. I mean seriously, how blatantly fucking stupid can she be?

On page 36 of the motion is her affidavit from Linda Jordan who states, (also “under penalty of perjury”):


“I used the government run E-Verify System to verify the employment eligibility for Barack H Obama”.


“I considered myself to be one of the employers of the President of the United States.”

Now, what was that Judge Lamberth was saying about the Court concluding “that plaintiff has submitted a page that some individual obtained under false pretenses—that is, by representing himself as the President’s employer”?

Un Believable!

Another “earth shattering” bit of new evidence that Orly has submitted is this little jewel:


“On August 29, 2011 Mail on Line, The Australian, The Washington Times, and many other papers and radio shows around the world reported on an arrest of Barack Obama's uncle Omar Obama, who was in U.S. Illegally, and was ordered deported from the United States.”


“This new information shows a pattern of Social security fraud committed by multiple members of Obama's family. It, also, shows misconduct and recklessness of employees of Social Security Administration at best or criminal complicity at worst in allowing illegal use of Social Security numbers. This is an additional factor, that shows, that release of SS-5 for the number in question is warranted, as it shows illegal conduct by a number of members of Obama's family, who are recipients of the SSNs, which warrants release of SS-5 not only for Connecticut number that Obama is using, but also of SS-5's for the social security numbers of his illegal alien relatives Omar Obama and Zeituni Obama.”

She really has this evidence thing down pat doesn’t she? (Eyes Roll!)

Lawdy lawd, I can’t wait to see what Judge Lamberth has to say when he responds to this!

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Orly Taitz Gets Her Ass Kicked Again Exactly As Predicted

In the Birferverse Obama has been accused of everything from being a gay cokehead Muslim who murdered his gay lover, to actually being the illegitimate son of Malcolm X who secretly trained with al Qaida terrorists while he was “supposed” to be attending law school at Columbia. And Orly Taitz has been all over every bit of it like stink on shit since day one. With her intense bigotry and downright hatred of Muslims, along with her narcissistic craving for publicity and fame, come hell or high water she intends to find a way to “do this usurper in” and gain the glory and praise of the world. Even though she has never had the first scrap of any kind of actual evidence to back up any of her delusional claims, and the fact that she has lost every single case she has ever filed, she still goes on claiming emanate victory… any minute now.

Her latest unsurprising failure being her case Taitz v Astrue where she intended to force the SSA to release to her Obama’s original SS application. The fact that the law forbids release of any information on living people was irrelevant. She intended to prove he committed fraud and she had no problem committing fraud herself to attempt to prove it.

Judge Lamberth “Denied”  all of her motions, including her motion to compel the state of Hawaii to comply with her subpoena for Obama’s original birth certificate, and “Granted”  final judgment for the defendant, dismissing the case “with prejudice” which means that Orly will never again be allowed to sue the SSA under the FOIA over this “alleged” fraudulent SS# she claims Obama has. In his 8 page “Memorandum Opinion”  he begins with:

“Ever persistent, plaintiff has once again come before this Court in an effort to uncover “the biggest cover up in the history of this nation.” She believes that the President is using a “fraudulently obtained” social security number and that the Social Security Administration—among other agencies—is involved in a scheme to “cover up social security fraud, IRS fraud, elections fraud and possibly treason” committed by the President. As her numerous filings with the Court demonstrate, plaintiff will stop at nothing to get to the bottom of this alleged conspiracy. Unfortunately for plaintiff, today is not her lucky day.”

In laymen’s terms I’d sure call that a birther bitch slap. The best part of his memorandum IMO finally addresses the unethical (if not criminal) way she obtained this “so-called” evidence she submitted to the court in his subparagraph #4.

“Plaintiff submits the Selective Service registration acknowledgment form associated with security number xxx-xx-4425, which apparently is “readily available on the world wide web.” She argues that this form establishes that the President is fraudulently using social security number xxx-xx-4425, and that the Selective Service and the SSA are “engaged in a cover up” of his fraud. The Selective Service does not release registration acknowledgment forms to the public; only a registrant himself can request proof of his registration. See Registration Information, http://www.sss.gov/ack.htm. The Court can only conclude that plaintiff has submitted a form that some individual obtained through a false request and subsequently posted online. Plaintiff also submits a “verification results” page from the Social Security Number Verification System (“SSNVS”) indicating that social security number xxx-xx-4425 is “not in file (never issued).” She argues that this page is further evidence that the SSA is covering up the President’s use of social security number xxx-xx-4425. The SSA uses the SSNVS to provide employers with a means of verifying the names and social security numbers of employees. See SSNVS Handbook, http://www.ssa.gov/employer/ssnvshandbk/ssnvsHandbook.pdf.  “Anyone who knowingly and willfully uses SSNVS to request or obtain information from SSA under false pretenses violates Federal law and may be punished by a fine, imprisonment or both.” As with the registration acknowledgement form discussed above, the Court can only conclude that plaintiff has submitted a page that some individual obtained under false pretenses—that is, by representing himself as the President’s employer. The Court notes that both documents submitted by plaintiff are incomplete; the address on the registration acknowledgment form and the employer identification number on the SSNVS page have been blacked out, further confirming the documents’ fraudulent origins. For all of these reasons, the Court will disregard both documents as well as any arguments made in reliance on them.”

Of course granting judgment for the defense in this case completely moots her case against Loretta Fuddy in the state of Hawaii, which was based on the Taitz v Astrue case. Taitz claimed however at her hearing for ECF privileges the same day this ruling came out that she intended to appeal and was confident that her appeal would be granted and persuaded the court in Hawaii to give her time to try to do so.

This Motion to Reconsider will also be a failure, just like everything else she has ever done while touting emanate victory at every turn.

According to a competent and reliable source who was present in the courtroom in Hawaii for this hearing, Fogbow Obot “Mikedunford” who reported on the case we see how Taitz twists and even disregards actual truth when relaying information to her flying monkeys on her website. Immediately after the hearing Orly posted this on her website:

“Update, motion to compel producion of Obama’s original BC was postponed to November 21, 9:30 am
Posted on August 30, 2011
Today at 5:15 pm PST we had a hearing with the District Judge Susan Oke Mollway. She supervises magistrate judge Puglisi.
She gave me ECF privileges to file electronically.”

Actually no, she didn’t give Orly ECF privileges. According to Mike this is what was actually said:

“The Judge explained that the hearing is on Orly's motion for ECF privileges. She asked Orly if Orly had ECF filing privileges in her own district. Orly said that she did. The judge then proceeded to very slowly, clearly, and patiently explain to Orly that the practice normally followed if you want ECF privileges in the Hawaii District, the normal procedure is to go to the district's website. She then read - on the record - the website address to Orly. And repeated some of it when Orly indicated that she didn't quite catch all of it. She then told Orly to look over at the left side of the screen, where it says "ECF". "Then there will be a place where you click."
She then suggested that Orly might want to select the box asking to be exempted from the training requirement because of the training she's done in California, and informed Orly that this sort of thing is handled by the Clerk of the Court, and is not something that the Judges deal with. Orly was then advised to go ahead and follow the normal procedures to obtain ECF access.”

Orly also claimed in her post:

“Deputy atorney General of Hawaii Jill Nagamine and assistant Attorey General Rebecca Quinn were there and demanded to dismiss the case and the hearing in light of todays’ order by judge Lamberth.”

According to Mike they didn’t “demand” anything:

“Ms. Nagamine then stood up and said that she'd received information this morning indicating that the underlying case in DC was dismissed, and would the Judge like to see a copy of the order and the supporting memorandum. Judge Mollway read the order into the record. She then explained, for the record, what the memorandum was. She then asked Orly if she agreed that her DC case was dismissed.
Orly responded by saying that as the Judge knew, that's not a final decision, because she has the right to file a motion for reconsideration. She went on to say that she has important new evidence, that she will be filing a motion for reconsideration shortly, and that, "I have no doubt my motion will be granted."

As far as the hearing being rescheduled? From Mike’s report:

“They went off the record briefly while the courtroom manager called down to Judge Puglisi's chambers, and got a new hearing date of 26 October. Judge Mollway then informed Orly that this should be enough time for Judge Lamberth to rule on the motion for reconsideration. She also informed Orly that Orly needs to keep the court advised of what happens with the motion for reconsideration, because if the motion for reconsideration is tossed, HI will close the current action.
They finally settled on 21 November at 0930. If the case is still alive.
Orly was then informed that Judge Puglisi may decide to deal with the matter without a hearing. Judge Mollway made sure to tell Orly that judges are allowed to do that, and that it would probably be a good idea to check with Judge Puglisi's chambers before getting on a plane to come out here.”

And a big Thank you to Mike for the time he took to do this reporting!

In a post on her website today she posted Happy Thanksgiving wishes to Obama. In part she says:

“Happy thanksgiving Mr. Obama!
Posted on September 1, 2011

”Federal Judge for the US district court for the District of Hawaii Susan Oke-Mollway moved my motion hearing to compel production of Obama’s original birth certificate for expert inspection to November 21, 9:30 am in front of magistrate judge Richard Puglisi. So, now right before Thanksgiving, the whole country and media will be talking about Obama’s fraudulent use of a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 (redacted by CIP) and about his use of computer generated forgery instead of a valid birth certificate.” He really wishes it was his drunken sailor spending we were talking about, as at least being moron on the issues of economy is not criminal, you don’t go to prison for being a moron and spending this nation into oblivion. Using stolen Social Security number and a forged birth certificate is criminal, for which he can be moved in handcuffs from the White House to the Big House.
Happy thanksgiving Mr. Obama! (or should I say Happy Ramadan?)”

Happy Ramadan? And she has room to talk about morons? (Pot meet kettle, kettle meet pot.) Just more proof of her deep seeded bigotry, as well as her delusional thinking that she is actually going to get somewhere with this motion to reconsider, or anything else in her entire birfer movement. Oh well, she’s got to come up with something to keep her stupid followers clicking that paypal button.

A quick word to the flying monkeys here; save your money, this hearing will never happen.

The real irony of Judge Lamberth’s subparagraph #4 from this latest ruling and his statement in reference to her illegally obtained “evidence” that “the Court will disregard both documents as well as any arguments made in reliance on them”, is that Taitz’s next stupid case “Taitz v Ruemmler”  has already been assigned to Judge Lamberth. Can you guess what her primary evidence in that case is?


(BTW, sorry for my neglect of this blog lately, It’s been a busy year in the real world and I’ve been away most of the summer.)