Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Hawaii Health Department Tells Orly Taitz To Stuff It

After Orly sent her bogus self generated subpoena (with no authority from the courts) to the Hawaii Director of Health, Loretta Fuddy, she received and posted on her website this response, and a copy of the letter:

"Attorney General of HI states, that the director of Health Loretta Fuddy will not comply with the subpoena and will not provide access to original BC due to reasons of privacy. How is it private, when he posted the copy on Whitehouse.com. It’s not privacy, it’s forgery, stupid
Posted on June 14, 2011"

Of course Orly is far to incompetent to grasp the fact that the state of Hawaii can only issue copies of a birth certificate to those legally eligible to obtain them. If Obama decides to release it further then that’s his business, and his right to do so. The fact that he did chose to release it to the public does NOT change the state laws. Here’s the letter:

"Dear Dr. Taitz:
My client, Loretta Fuddy, the Director of the Department of Health, State of Hawaii, is in receipt of the two above-referenced subpoenas issued by you. Pursuant to Hawaii state law, and as explained below, it is unlawful for Director Fuddy to comply with your request.
Neither subpoena was issued or served upon my client in accordance with the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”), Rule 45, thus it is our position that we have no duty to respond, however, to avoid confusion, our objections to those subpoenas, pursuant to Rule 45, FRCP, are noted below.
In addition to the procedural defects, these subpoenas would require disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, and there is no exception that applies to allow disclosure to you. Vital statistics records, such as birth certificates, are protected by strict confidentiality requirements under state law. Section 338-18, Hawaii Revised Statutes (“HRS”) prohibits disclosure of the records sought by your subpoenas without a showing of a direct tangible interest.
HRS §338-18 provides that:
a) To protect the integrity of vital statistics records, to ensure proper use, and to ensure the efficient and proper administration of the vital statistics system, it shall be unlawful for any person to permit inspection of, or to disclose information contained in vital statistics records, or to copy or issue a copy of all or part of any such record, except as authorized by this part or by rules adopted by the department of health.
b) The department shall not permit inspection of public health statistics records, or issue a certified copy of any such record or part thereof, unless it is satisfied that the applicant has a direct and tangible interest in the record. The following persons shall be considered to have a direct and tangible interest in a public health statistics record.
(1) The registrant;
(2) The spouse of the registrant;
(3) A parent of the registrant;
(4) A descendant of the registrant;
(5) A person having a common ancestor with the registrant;
(6) A legal guardian of the registrant;
(7) A person or agency acting on behalf of the registrant;
(8) A personal representative of the registrant’s estate;
(9) A person whose right to inspect or obtain a certified copy of the record is established by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction;
(10) Adoptive parents who have filed a petition for adoption and who need to determine the death of one or more of the prospective adopted child’s natural or legal parents;
(11) A person who needs to determine the marital status of a former spouse in order to determine the payment of alimony;
(12) A person who needs to determine the death of a nonrelated co-owner of property purchased under a joint tenancy agreement; and
(13) A person who needs a death certificate for the determination of payments under a credit insurance policy.
The list of persons with a direct and tangible interest in vital statistics records is limited to a thirteen enumerated categories listed above. My client is not satisfied that you have any direct and tangible interest in the record you seek, and you have not claimed to have such an interest. Therefore, because you are unable to satisfy HRS § 338-18 (b)(9), the Director of Health cannot provide you the birth record you seek. Based on the above, please be advised that this letter serves as written objection to your subpoena pursuant to Rule 45 (c)(2)(B), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Very truly yours
Jill T. Nagamine
Deputy Attorney General
cc: Loretta Fuddy, Director of Health"

Meanwhile, she’s also getting pissed that her latest “filings” in Taitz v Astrue have not been docketed so she posted this calling once again on her flying monkeys to call and badger the court:

I need your help
Posted on June 14, 2011 No Comments
US district court in DC is not docketing pleadings in my case Taitz v Astrue 11-cv-402
The documents that needs to be docketted are:
1. Motion for Clarification
2. Motion for Default Judgment
3. Redacted Complaint and exhibits (97 pages)
4.Redacted first amended complaint and exhibits (61 pages)
5. I am wondering if Judge Lamberth already ruled on my motion for production of Vaughn index, but the clerks did not post it. Previously the did not post the scheduling order for 2 days, from June 1-to June 3, during which time the White House counsel Robert Bauer resigned. I am wondering, if anyone else is resigning?
I am very busy. Can someone call the clerk of the court and check, why those documents were not docketed and would the clerk docket them today.
(I really need help, as I have 10 patients one after another and don’t have time to call the clerks office and dit on hold forever. I actually have to work in my dental office to cover all my pro bono legal work)"

PAH-Leease! Everything is a conspiracy to this woman, and everyone is out to get her. She is beyond paranoid and delusional. The fact that Judge Lamberth DIRECTED her to redact all the SSN’s from those documents and re-file them, and the fact that not only did she NOT comply with that order but she filed and refilled more shit with even more unredacted SSN’s couldn’t POSSIBLY have anything to do with why they weren’t docketed, right? I swear this woman needs serious mental help!

Still steaming about being told pretty much to fuck off by the State of Hawaii, she decided to go straight to the source in order to get her hands on that original birth certificate and wrote a nasty letter to President Obama:

"letter to Barack Obama, requesting voluntary consent for access to his original BC, stored in HI
Posted on June 14, 2011 No Comments
Dr Orly Taitz Esq
29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Ph 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
Orly.Taitz@gmail.com
06.14.2011
Mr. Barack Hussein Obama
White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave
Washington DC
Via certified mail returned receipt
Dear Mr. Obama
On April 27 2011 with great fanfare you unearthed your long form birth certificate, which in spite of some 100 legal actions against you, for some inexplicable reason, you kept sealed some three years.
This birth certificate was provided by you to the public and posted on the WhiteHouse.gov web site. You felt, that you really silenced all the civil rights and constitutional attorneys questioning your legitimacy to the position of the President and Commander in Chief, by calling them “Carnival barkers” and making an alleged certified copy of your long form original birth certificate available to the public.
This document looked good for an hour or two, until the expert reports started coming, showing that the document is a forgery, not even a good one, but a cheap third rate forgery. Please, see attached Exhibits 1 and 2, sworn affidavits from experts Paul Irey and Douglas Vogt, attesting to the fact, that the document in question is a forgery.
Conducting discovery in my ongoing case Taitz v Astrue, I requested from the director of Health of the state of Hawaii, Loretta Fuddy, access to your original birth certificate stored at the Health Department. After all, since you released a certified copy of the document, the issue of privacy is non-existent, everyone knows, what is or should be in that document, it should be identical to what you released and made a public record.
Today I received a fax from the Attorney General of the state of Hawaii, (Exhibit 3) stating that Director of Health Department, Ms. Fuddy, will not comply with the subpoena and will not allow access to the original long form birth certificate. The reason given, was your privacy, which of course makes no sense what so ever.
In the interest of respect for the National Security of the United States of America, in the interest of respect for the members of the US military and to each and every citizen of this country, I call upon you and respectfully request to consent to grant access to the original long form typewritten 1961 birth certificate, which was issued to you and signed by Stanley Ann Dunham, Dr. David Sinclair and registrar Lee.
If you were not aware of forgery in your documents, you clearly would want to cooperate and grant such access within the next 7 days.
If, on the other hand, you refuse to provide such access, that would signify complicity and prior knowledge of forgery. I would hope, it is prior, rather, than latter, and I hope your consent will be received within the next 7 days. If the consent is not received, I will have no other choice, but to seek other avenues of gaining access to the document in question.
Respectfully,
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ"

Respectfully? Finding any respect in that letter would be like finding diamonds in dog shit. Un-fricking-believable! And exactly what “other avenues of gaining access” could she possibly be talking about? She’s already been at it for over 2 years, she’s gone all the way to the SCOTUS and back and all she’s gotten is publicly laughed at and told to “Piss Off” by the courts. Swatted away by every single court she’s ever been in front of like nothing more than an annoying fly at a picnic. Not to mention sanctioned and fined $20,000 for her trouble. What the hell else does she “imagine” she can do? Whatever it is I have no doubt that all she’ll EVER get is laughed at even more and continually blown off by the courts. Not because it’s a conspiracy, but because she’s nothing but an annoying incompetent buffoon!

Speaking of which, I’m so looking forward to her next birfer bitch slap from Judge Lamberth. We should be seeing that any time now. But Orly’s paranoia is still raging far into the “conspiracy zone”. First she claims that Obama’s “whole family has nothing but forgery instead genuine records” because of course his mother was a communist fraud with a stolen SSN too, and then she posts this:

"is there an attempt on the way to obstruct justice and burry my case Taitz v Astrue . Is there undue influence in other cases?
Posted on June 15, 2011 No Comments
I am concerned, that there is a concerted effort to obstruct justice and burry my case. The clerks are not docketting the pleadings and exhibits. there are no orders from the judge.
The clerks were supposed to docket
1. motion for clarification
2 motion for default judgment
3 redacted complaint with all the exhibits
4redacted first amended complaint with all the exhibits
5. an order to produce Vaughn index was supposed to come out long time ago and the index was supposed to be produced.
6. I believe there is pressure on the assistant attorney Nemeroff to file a motion to dismiss and for the judge to dismiss the case summarily and bury all the evidence
There are other areas, where I am concerned
I filed multiple motions to dismiss a frivolous law suit by Berg and Kreep. I’ve been harassed for 2 years with this bogus law suit, where Berg’s lead plaintiff and his paralegal Lisa Liberi claimed, that she was defamed, even though she was never defamed, and she is indeed a convicted document forger and thief with a total of 46 criminal charges and 10 felony convictions of forgery and grand theft. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals ordered the transferee court to rule on all outstanding motions. So far the judge on the case, Andrew Guilford, did not rule on the merits on one single motion to either dismiss the case or strike it under AntiSLAPP. What it means, is that when one is filing a frivolous law suit against you, just to harass you and try to silence you as a whistle-blower, stifle your first amendment right to free speech, which is SLAPP- strategic law suit against public participation, a defendant, like myself, who is the real victim, has a right to bring an AntiSLAPP, to strike and dismiss a frivolous law suit and get her attorneys fees. For 2 years the federal court system is dragging its feet, not one single judge, neither prior judge Eduardo Robreno in PA, nor the Third circuit court of Appeals ever read the complaint or my motions, did not rule on the merits. The Third circuit originally ruled, that my appeal should be heard on the merits there, but later they reversed their own decision by reshuffling the panel and replacing the judges on the panel and ruled, that it should be decided in CA. The judge in Ca is not ruling on the merits either. I know that since early sixties the court system was used to keep dissidents marred in bogus law suits, but there has to be an end to this."

She seems to have her drawers in all kinds of knots. It also seems that there is no limit on how far she’s willing to twist the truth or flat out lie to suit her own purposes. Orly Taitz IS guilty of posting Lisa Liberi personal information INCLUDING her social security number. And the ONLY thing Orly is a victim of is her own hateful incompetence.

Orly, you’re on your way down. I hope you enjoy the ride!

AAAHAhahahaha

4 comments:

  1. Monday is the big day for Orly's deposition. I wonder when she is flying out? ( on donated FF miles of course.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. dibencozide - It's really good for me to see you and your hard work. Every piece of your work looks amazing. Look forward to learning more from you.

    ReplyDelete
  3. i revoke my last claim regarding no further contact. this is entirely too amusing therefore i most certainly must strike yet another match raging the ever so fierce fire under the rookies ass... ah ha ha ha!! you accuse another of mental incompetence yet your continuous attempt to win what is not qualified to compete for is the true definition of insanity. i know it was an early forfeit but the prize was just not profitable enough to pay for the campaign. the ball and chain has been slipped onto your leg not due to earned entitlement but false advertisement by all parties. sweet child, yet again the joke is on you. you will always be waiting on your winnings to be deposited but the tax and interest applied to the early loan you allowed to be taking out against you is off the charts. you will continue to pay the debt due, in result to an ignorant and over zealous child like mentality! all i can tell you now is slow down. this way you may have the chance to decipher the encryption surrounding you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good.
    I do not know who you are but certainly you're going to a famous blogger if you are not already ;) Cheers!

    Here is my web-site ... http://socialbook.fr/index.php?do=/profile-875/info/

    ReplyDelete