Wednesday, February 2, 2011

The Crazy Daze Of Tin Foil Taitz Continues

In our latest episode Orly has declared yet another war. You know, she’s had such great success in her other wars against Obama and the entire US Government, the sanctions and $20,000 fine imposed on her by Judge Land. And of course with her war of having every MSM journalist fired (and or jailed) who didn’t report favorably on her and all of her cases, (instead of reporting the truth), so now she has decided to go after all the bloggers that are being mean to her. Sniff, Sniff…

(A warning by the way, her website’s got the clap again, so be careful if you go there)

“These last 2-3 years were a complete hell for me and my family. Obama’s squads harassed not just me and my clients, they harassed my three children, my husband, his employer, his co-workers, his business clients and associates. These Obots acted like Nazi Gestapo. It is time to bring to light all that happened, not only to remove ineligible Obama from office, but to expose all of the people, who aided and abetted in this nightmare.
I need your help in gathering information on all of the attorneys, who have been defaming and slandering patriots. We need to report each and every one of them to their state bars
Posted on January 29, 2011 Submitted on 2011/01/29 at 5:08pm
Exactly accurate & true on all counts.
Seems we now may have ourselves a level playing field. I need your information and records about all of the individuals, who were posting on Politijab, Fogbow, OhForGoodnessSake, Crazyinternetpeople.
we need to report each and every one of them for slander, defamation of character, tampering with evidence, obstruction of justice, aiding and abetting fraud, treason, violation od civil rights under the color of authority (some of them are employees of the federal and state governments)
I will need reports for the House comittee on the Judiciary and for the Bar opf each state, where these thugs are still licensed as well as the chief judges of the courts where some of them are working as law clerks, or to the heads of the agencies where they work or the senior partners of the law firms, where they work. (some of them were already disbarred or resigned or suspended, but several are still licensed and it is time we make sure they are investigated and prosecuted)”

Of course I have no idea why the Bar in my state would give a rats ass what she has to say about me. I’m not a lawyer, but then again neither are a lot of the other people she intends to report, however we are talking about Orly here. I guess I can take it as a complement that I’ve been able to shove a little bug up her ass. Her very existence in this country after the way she slanders it and everyone in it certainly bugs me. Which is why I have no problem expressing my 1st Amendment right to say exactly what I think of the subject.

Anyway, here are a few more choice bits from “The Clap Trap” (aka Orly’s site)

“I noticed that most of the people, who are attacking me, are either disbarred as attorneys and they are angry, or they are convicted felons. I already identified four document forgers, some have psychiatric disorders. This gives you an idea, who Obama supporters are, why are they attacking law abidding citizens.”

And she wants to talk about psychiatric disorders?

“Yet another question, I am trying to answer, is who paid this insane artist Dan Lacy to pay inappropriate paintings of me. He admitted that he was paid, but I don’t know by whom.”

That would be George Soros of course. You know the Obot boss? The guy who signs all of our paychecks for bashing birthers.

“I, also, wanted to know if someone paid this comi rag OC Weekly to write nasty articles about me, photo-shop my picture to make me unrecognizable. I saw that a guy, who started this insanity, Spencer Kornhaber, no longer writes his nasty article, but they found another brainwashed jerk. I wrote to heir editor Mr. Moxley, and asked to provide truthful info, but he never wrote any truthful info."
"Bottom line, ObamaFraudGate is unraveling. Now 11 states are changing their laws in order to stop Obama run in 2012. We are getting closer in FOIAs, in different actions against different governmental agencies. More Constitutionalist congressmen are organizing. I am confident that sooner or later all of the players in ObamaFraudGate not only will lose their office, but they will be criminally prosecuted for their role in this massive fraud and treason for their part in aiding and abetting this fraud and treason by attacking attorneys, who brought ObamaFraudgate to courts and demanded answers.”

So, which is worse, a brainwashed jerk, or a batshit crazy birfer?

The question is, what set of this latest rampage of hers? Ya’ll remember the long-winded case of Liberi v Taitz, right? (Rundown can be read “here” ) Well that case is going to be heard on 2/9/11, and on 1/25/11 the court issued this letter.

LIBERI v TAITZ (THIRD CIRCUIT) - 01/25/2011 Open Document Submit Notification for Wednesday, 02/09/2011. (...

Poor Orly, not invited to her own case, imagine that! I think this may be one of the things that might have set her off this time, because she KNOWS she’s guilty of repeatedly posting and emailing Lisa Liberi’s personal information to the four corners of this planet. She has also put considerable time and effort into trying to make this case about everything and anything else except the fact that she did break the law and she IS guilty on that count. And now she won’t even be able to go in there and try to spin her way out of it.

So what does she do? She filed a motion to recuse the judges, and then requests permission to be allowed to present an oral argument anyway.

“C REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION IN REGARDS TO THE ORAL ARGUMENT
Appellants are aware that the court is not obligated to grant oral argument to the parties, however due to the fact that there were voluminous filings in this case, the appellants respectfully request this court to reconsider and grant their request for Oral argument.
respectfully
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ"

LIBERI v TAITZ (THIRD CIRCUIT) - Request for Recusal - Transport Room

I can’t imagine that any judge with knowledge of the way she behaves in court would be willing to subject themselves to her off the wall tirades.

The other thing that could be pulling her trigger is that as soon as that case is over, she has to face her personal assistant, X-squeeze and dental chair tango partner, Charles E Lincoln III who is hauling her AND her husband’s asses into court. He’s suing them both because he claims that Orly screwed him over on all the promises she made while they were having their sleazy little adulterous affair.

Of course even though Orly has been extremely careful not to let any mention of being sued by her adulterous lover get out on her website, now all of her followers have the potential of finding out her dirty little secret. This could very well harm the imaginary image of being the virtuous and saintly “Lady Liberty” she has worked so hard to portray herself as.

(Lipstick on a pig comes to my mind here)

We’ll just have to wait and see what happens in these two cases. Will Taitz be convicted for publishing Liberi’s personal info? If so what will the CA Bar have to say about that? Will Lincoln get satisfaction for being dumped and having his heart broken? Will Yosef divorce Taitz for adultery if she loses the case? Will he divorce her anyway? Will Taitz succeed in having the Bar in each state reprimand bloggers that are not even lawyers? Will Taitz’s head explode from all this drama?

Stay tuned for the next exciting episode!

19 comments:

  1. So Oily Taintz wants information on all the people who have posted on sites like this one, eh? Well, she can start with me:

    I was born in Philadelphia, PA. I am neither a felon nor a lawyer. (Isn't it interesting how she can think of her enemies only in terms of crime?)
    I served in the armed forces from 1970 to 1993 (let her find out which branch!). During all that time, I was prepared to fight people from places like where she was born. In fact, if the USSR still existed, I'd be halfway convinced that Orly was part of a Soviet long-term plot to disrupt/destroy the United States, by twisting our laws against us.

    If this birther issue shows her competence as a lawyer, I must conclude I can't trust my teeth to her either. There, now she has another slander she can add to her list!

    ReplyDelete
  2. This has been like one big soap opera that's hard to get away from. I should sue her just for all of the drama and taking my attention off of my work. If I were Orly, that's what I would do. It would be frivolous, but what the hell?

    If only I hadn't been watching MSNBC the day they had her on for her meltdown. That's when I first found out about this birther movement and Orly Taitz. I've been hooked ever since.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why do you hate this woman so much?

    She has worked tiredlessly to expose Obama/Soetoro/Sobaraq.

    He is not a NBC.

    There are evidences he has used false social security numbers.

    What has Orly done that annoys you so much?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous,

    Actually there is only one thing in this world I truly “hate” (besides pumpkin pie and mushrooms) and that would be anyone who harms children. There are many things I seriously dislike, and yes Orly is on that list. Why? Because she slanders this country, our government and make a mockery of what it means to be a patriot. She has called for armed sedition against this government, for military revolt and that is treason, not patriotism. She has no understanding what so ever of the Constitution of the US, yet she claims to be a constitutional lawyer.

    Where is your official proof that Obama is not a NBC? Because Orly and WND says so? Nowhere in the constitution does it state that a person must have 2 NBC parents to quality as a NBC. As a matter of fact there are only 2 kinds of American citizens. Natural Born, or Naturalized. If we read case law, the 14th amendment, as well as Title 8 of the US code, section 1401, which defines “Nationals and citizens of the US at birth, (among other case law) it is clear that Obama is in fact a NBC.
    Here’s a link: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1401.html just FYI.

    Orly intentionally misrepresents the truth on every occasion she can possibly find to further her own agenda of slandering and defaming Obama our government and our laws. Just as one recent example if you will have the patience to read this, this is directly from her website:

    “Posted on | January 23, 2011 | No Comments
    Here is some information YOU ARE NOT GOING TO LIKE THIS: Obama Care Highlighted by Page Number”

    THE CARE BILL HB3200
    THIS IS THE 2ND OFFICIAL WHO HAS OUTLINED THESE PARTS OF THE CARE BILL
    Judge Kithil of Marble Falls , TX – HB3200 highlighted pages most egregious Please read this…….. especially the reference to pages 58 & 59”

    First of all, the healthcare bill (or Obamacare) that was passed into law was HR3590, not HB3200. And actually everything posted after that in reference to HB3200 is also a lie. For the sake of time and space we will just look at the first 2 examples.

    #1
    “** Page 50/section 152: The bill will provide insurance to all non-U.S. residents, even if they are here illegally.”

    This is a lie. From the actual text and you can look it up yourself if you want:
    http://candicemiller.house.gov/pdf/hr3200.pdf

    HB3200

    “SEC. 152. PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION IN HEALTH CARE.
    IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise explicitly permitted by this Act and by subsequent regulations consistent with this Act, all health care and related services (including insurance coverage and public health activities) covered by this Act shall be provided without regard to personal characteristics extraneous to the provision of high quality health care or related services.
    IMPLEMENTATION.—To implement the requirement set forth in subsection (a), the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall, not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, promulgate such regulations as are necessary or appropriate to insure that all health care and related services (including insurance coverage and public health activities) covered by this Act are provided (whether directly or through contractual, licensing, or other arrangements) without regard to personal characteristics extraneous to the provision of high quality health care or related services.”

    Cont…

    ReplyDelete
  5. (Anonymous part 2)

    #2
    “** Page 58 and 59: The government will have real-time access to an individual’s bank account and will have the authority to make electronic fund transfers from those accounts.”

    This is also a lie. The actual text is about electronic filing and says:

    “SEC. 1173A. STANDARDIZE ELECTRONIC ADMINISTRATIVE
    TRANSACTIONS.STANDARDS FOR FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRA13
    TIVE TRANSACTIONS.—
    IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall adopt and regularly update standards consistent with the goals described in paragraph (2).(2) GOALS FOR FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSACTIONS.—The goals for standards under paragraph (1) are that such standards shall— (A) be unique with no conflicting or redundant standards; B) be authoritative, permitting no additions or constraints for electronic transactions, including companion guides; (C) be comprehensive, efficient and robust, requiring minimal augmentation by paper transactions or clarification by further communications; (D) enable the real-time (or near real time) determination of an individual’s financial responsibility at the point of service and, to the extent possible, prior to service, including whether the individual is eligible for a specific service with a specific physician at a specific facility, which may include utilization of a machine-readable health plan beneficiary identification card; (E) enable, where feasible, near-time adjudication of claims; (F) provide for timely acknowledgment, response, and status reporting applicable to any electronic transaction deemed appropriate by the Secretary; (G) describe all data elements (such as reason and remark codes) in unambiguous terms, not permit optional fields, require that data elements be either required or conditioned upon set values in other fields, and prohibit additional conditions; and (H) harmonize all common data elements across administrative and clinical transaction standards.”

    The point is people send her hearsay and gossip and without having the decency to check out the actual facts, (especially if they do not jive with her agenda) she just runs with it and makes it gospel. This can be applied to just about every single claim she has made. And she does this with the hopes that people will not check the facts for themselves, and just go with whatever she says as truth.

    “Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said Obama was born there”. No she didn’t. There was a misunderstanding in the interpretation, but birthers cut it off right there and called it gospel. If you listen to the rest of the conversation, she says, “NO, he was born in Hawaii”. That part doesn’t fit with the agenda though so birthers left it out.

    Here, read it and listen for yourself:
    http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2009/07/23/liddy

    If you checked the facts for yourself on every claim she makes, you would easily be able to debunk everything she says. I challenge you to try it. If you can’t find the answers to any question you have, let me know and I’ll help you look, but I won’t just say, “this is how it really is”, I will point you directly to the facts so you can read them for yourself.

    Have you ever seen any actual legitimate “Proof” of anything Orly has ever said? The only thing Orly has ever worked tirelessly at is manipulation and spinning the truth.

    Will you take my challenge?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ms Daisy. There's no arguing with birthers. They believe what they want to believe because it fits their minds.

    While I read what they write on various blogs, it now is for entertainment purposes only. It amazes me that these people are not just ignorant. After considerable time and thought, I have come to the conclusion that they are just plain stupid. If they were ignorant, then they would have the capability to educate themselves and it is apparent that they don't have that ability.

    One thought that always comforts me is that the majority of Americans have absolutely no idea that they even exist.

    On another note, it is probably important to remind them who won the civil war when it comes to their seditionist remarks.

    ~ anotherparadox - aka NOTAXJ

    ReplyDelete
  7. AP, I wasn’t arguing, I was trying to reason. And while I agree that many are hopeless, there are some that are potentially just miss-led. Any light we may be able to shed for them, or at least the inspiration to look for actual facts themselves will open eyes. (Unless they are hopeless of course)

    This is the whole problem with birthism. People just take what they are given and that’s that. They don’t question or look on their own to see if the info is legitimate or not. And the other problem is where they look. The internet is a vast universe and 90% of it is full of shit. Anyone can go on line, create fancy websites and post anything they want, but that does not necessarily make it a legitimate source of information.

    If we can help anyone understand that, then we’ve done a good thing :)

    Now we just wait to see if our Anonymous poster will come back and take my challenge.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I probably shouldn't have used the word argue. Reasoning probably won't do any good either.

    Where I see the word argue become relevant is when I read the comments at Doc C's website. When they get a birther in there and do a back and forth, it reminds me of that Monty Python script where the guy goes in to buy an argument and gets a disagreement or something to that affect. They go back and forth with the birther and nothing is accomplished. To this date, I have yet to see a birther reasoned with.

    Look at KenyanBornObamaCorn whom we have both argued with on Washington Independent. She's even more crazy today than back in 2009.

    That's why I used to compare Birthers to Terminators. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear (except of Obama). And they absolutely will not stop, ever, until Obama is out of office.

    ReplyDelete
  9. So your interpretation of NBC is very easy to understand:

    Saddam Hussein could have inpregnated Obama/Soetoro mother and that would be OK?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous. What is so simple about the definition of natural born citizen is simply this. A person born in the United States or its territories. So, yes, it would be possible for Saddam Hussein (if he were still alive) to impregnate a woman and that woman have a child born here that would someday grow up to be president. That woman would not even have to be a US citizen. Just needs to have her baby here.

    But, that is not the case with Obama. Is it? There were no secrets. Everyone knew Obama's father was a citizen of Kenya under British control. Obama was a dual citizen at birth. However, he never renounced his US citizenship and thus he remains a US citizen.

    You go along and live with your deluded thoughts. It is apparent that you're too obtuse to understand the laws of this country and have no respect whatsoever of the US Constitution.

    What I am thoroughly enjoying is this. This country is quickly becoming less white. The good thing about it is that soon whites will be the minority. And because that seems to bother you, it gives me much more pleasure.

    There will come a day that your opinion will have no affect on the outcome of elections. And it is highly likely that one day we will have a president whose parents were never US citizens. Live with that.

    ReplyDelete
  11. What do you mean Ok?

    In this country the law is the law and it applies equally to everyone. If Attila the Hun was alive and impregnated an American citizen, that child would be a NB American citizen. No one can be denied rightful NB citizenship status because one of the parents is not an American citizen; regardless of what country the other parent comes from, or regardless of that other country’s laws. In this country, nothing trumps American Law. Also, any American child born with the right to duel citizenship is still under American law a NBC until such time the “child comes of age” and “chooses” to give up the American citizenship in favor of the other nationality.

    I’ve already directed you to the 14th Amendment, Title 8 of the US code, section 1401, and just as a bonus here is more documentation from the Yale Law Journal:
    http://yalelawjournal.org/images/pdfs/pryor_note.pdf

    If it is your claim that this is not the case, I would ask you point me to any “official” US legal authority/documentation that states otherwise. Or to direct me to any “official” US legal authority/documentation that states that any law (or laws) of any other country overrides US law on US soil.

    I’d be happy to read it and get back to you.

    ReplyDelete
  12. AP, you forgot to mention that someday we are likely to have a gay or lesbian POTUS too! Boy that’ll really send the homophobic thumpers into a tailspin. LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Ms Daisy. There was a time in my life that a thought of that would have sent me into a tailspin. I'm a recovered racist and homophobe. Being racist is the way I was raised. My dad frequently used the "N" word and also used all sorts of derogatory words to refer to blacks and homosexuals.

    It wasn't until I went to college and began to meet people that had different colors of skin and came from different cultures that I finally opened my eyes and realized that these are not people that I need to be afraid of.

    My first year of college, I roomed with a student from Iran. And the guy was the nicest, most generous person one could ever meet. His family used to send him huge bags of pistachios and confectionary to him that he would in turn share with me. His friends were always very friendly and would often invite me along to do what ever they were going out to do.

    I think most of these people put themselves into a bubble to protect them from those 'evil' people that are different than they are. And they use their religion to justify their hatred. That's what makes me sick about people that are saying such hateful things about Obama rather than coming up with a rational reason for not liking him. If they could argue they don't like him because of a particular position he has on real issues in this country rather than hate him for some bizarre conspiracy that's in their minds, I'd have more respect for them.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Good for you AP. It’s a shame that others lack the ability to learn and think for themselves.

    I was a product of a military melting pot, but even so anyone that lived through the 60’s encountered some kind of bigotry or racism. I grew up in a completely intergraded bi-racial, multi-cultural environment and to us kids the only differences that mattered were the various kinds of cool nibbles the different moms produced as afternoon snacks. We had everything from fried apples to Kimchi; it was like growing up in a kid’s nibble paradise.

    When I got old enough to understand about bigotry, I was shocked that people could hate others just for the color of their skin, or the slant of their eyes. That made no sense to me what so ever. That was a long time ago, but it’s even more shocking that 50 years later it still goes on.

    Several years before Obama was elected I went on a medical relief mission to South Africa. I remember being amazed at how bad the race relations there really were and thought at the time that they had to be at least 50 years behind us. But once a black man sashayed his skinny little ass into the WH I realized that a large chunk of the racism in this country hadn’t ever really gone away. It just went into the closet, and having a black POTUS was just too much of a strain on the hate to keep it there.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Wow! "Saddam Hussein could inpregnate a woman in the US and that child could grow up to be POTUS."

    When Michael Savage stated liberalism is a "mental disorder", a comment such as the above, could not have been more true!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Yes Anonymous, legally any NBC has the right to run for POTUS. The Constitution Of The United States says NBC, and that is not followed by any exceptions in regard to parentage. If you do not think this is accurate according to the law, then I ask you to point me to the exact text that designates any such exceptions.

    Of course that means you will not be able to rely on hearsay, and you will have to actually read the constitution to find it.

    ReplyDelete
  17. In all fairness, if we knew Saddam Hussein was the father of a child born to a woman in the United States, there could be a legal problem. Would Saddam Hussein fall under diplomat status? Probably not.

    The problem with birthers is that they have all of the conspiracys floating around in their minds about Obama. They say we know nothing about him even though we know more about him than any other past president based on books he wrote.

    As I wrote before, anonymous was trying to give some kind of false assertion that Obama's father was perhaps a person like Saddam Hussein. We all know based on the information provided by Hawaii's health department and information from people who knew his mother and dad that this is not the case.

    Their whole purpose is to throw anything against the wall and see what will stick. In the end, Obama will eventually leave office with every privilege and protection of every past president. There will never be that OMG! moment where they will see him led out of the White House in cuffs. Well, maybe in their dreams.

    It will certainly be interesting in 2012 when all of these state laws that they think will keep Obama off of the ticket will be thrown out for being un-constitutional. However, perhaps at least this will put the issue to rest and they can complain that SCOTUS has been in on the whole conspiracy from the very beginning when they finally learn that NBC means born in the United States. This 2 parent citizen bs is something I fear comes from home schooling.

    On a side note, I am so much hoping that the Republicans try to run Bobby Jindal for president either in 2012 or sometime in the future. Their heads should explode considering he was conceived in India and his parents' had him 3 months after arriving in the United States.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Oily can report me to the bar if she wants but I really don't think they will care since I'm not an attorney and unlike Oily, I don't claim to be one! I don't work for the local, state or federal government and I sure haven't been getting paid to post anything about anyone. (I wish!) I am capable of reading however and my ears seem to be working pretty well. It seems to me Oily might want to revisit some of what she has said and done. Trying to get people to take up arms against the lawful, elected-by-the-people government is not a very patriotic or legal thing to do. She doesn't seem to understand her own words could get her in trouble. Encouraging military personnel to violate their oath and take up arms against the very government they swore to defend. Does she not realize that once something is on the web it never goes away? That her rants can be pulled out and used to demonstrate how she has committed crimes against this government?

    Talk about someone who has slandered people. Oily surely has the record for the numbers she has slandered! The rest of us pretty much just talk about her and a few others. She has included everyone that she has ever come in contact with that didn't bow down to her bats*it crazy BS. All the judges, law clerks, attorney's, the president, Nancy Pelosi and any other politician who won't agree with her, the US Supreme Court, reporters, journalists, editors, state officials, bloggers and even a bunch of us who just make comments. I don't care what she thinks about what we write but I do take exception to her denigrating our president for false accusations instead of being honest enough to admit she hates the fact that a black man sits in the Oval Office. If it was just disagreeing with his politics, she could disagree like so many others do. But instead she makes it much more personal and makes claims of wrongdoing against his mother and grandparents as well as the president himself. Oily wouldn't know honor if it hit her in the face- a fact she has amply demonstrated time after time. I find it very distasteful that she levels charges against people who are not alive to defend themselves, who had no basis to do as she alleges- to file false statements at the birth of President Obama.

    And then we have people like anonymous making claims they can't back up about the president and sticking up for a woman we know to make it up as she goes along. I wish everyone was as capable of looking up truth as so many of us have done. But then I guess many of them don't want truth- they just want an excuse to claim our president isn't legitimate.

    ReplyDelete
  19. You are absolutely right R on all but one point. It’s not just that Obama is black that chews her ass so badly. Orly is a Jew, born in communist Russia and immigrated to Israel in 1981, (and on to the US in 87). Obama’s father was a Muslim, and that is where I believe the deepest root of her hatred for Obama is. She hates Muslims worse than Hitler hated Jews, and I think when she looks at Obama that is all she sees.

    ReplyDelete