Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Orly Taitz Is Gearing Up For Another Slap Down

The petition for “writ of certiorari” Taitz filed with the SCOTUS in her continued efforts to overturn sanctions against her has been distributed for conference on January 7th 2011. She filed her petition on October 21, 2010 in the SCOTUS, and yesterday (1/4/11) she posted a link to her “supplemental brief”  to that petition.

Reading both documents is quite clear that Taitz either has absolutely no clue, or just plain refuses to acknowledge why she was actually sanctioned. In all of her filings battling the sanctions, and the $20,000 fine she has continued to claim that she was sanctioned, (in her own words) “not because of anything she did improperly”, but claims instead that sanctions were to “intimidate and silence her” for bringing an eligibility case at all against a sitting President.

Of course nothing could be farther from the truth. It was her utter incompetence, as well as her arrogant and flippant disrespect for the law and for the court that caused her to be sanctioned. And that seems to be something that will never sink in to her peroxide damaged brain.

Excerpts from Judge Lands order, just as a little refresher for Orly in case she happens by:

“Instead of arguing pertinent legal authority supporting her position, counsel reverted to “press conference mode,” repeating political “talking points” that did not answer the Court’s questions or address the Court’s concerns.”
“When the Court admonished her for not addressing the legal issues presented by her Complaint, counsel accused the Court of unfairly badgering her and implored the Court to ask Defendants’ counsel questions instead of her. Ms. Taitz’s performance confirmed to the Court that her focus was not to pursue a legitimate legal cause of action to obtain relief for her client but was to use the Court to force the President to produce a “birth certificate” satisfactory to her and her followers.”
“During the hearing, Plaintiff’s counsel threatened that if she did not get the opportunity to obtain the relief she sought (discovery of a birth certificate), then a wave of subsequent similar actions would be filed in this Court until she obtained what she wanted.”
“The Court found that Plaintiff had failed to satisfy any of the elements necessary for a federal court to interfere with a deployment order issued by the U.S. Army. The Court further found the action to be legally frivolous, meaning that no reasonable attorney could have expected that her legal claim would prevail under existing law or under a reasonable extension or modification of existing law. The claims were based solely on conjecture and speculation that the President may not have been born in the United States.”
“Counsel here has an affidavit from someone who allegedly paid off a government official to rummage through the files at a Kenyan hospital to obtain what counsel contends is the President’s “authentic” birth certificate. Counsel here makes no coherent argument connecting the Constitution’s presidential citizenship requirement to a violation of her client’s individual constitutional rights.”
“Counsel, at least superficially, appears to understand that she must structure her claim to overcome the standing hurdle. She attempted to clear that hurdle on her way to the prize (verification of the President’s place of birth) by having her client challenge her deployment orders. This leap from a concern about a President’s Constitutional eligibility to hold the office to a private legal cause of action by an Army Captain to avoid deployment pursuant to another wise valid order is where counsel entered the thicket of legal frivolity.”
“The absolute absence of any legitimate legal argument, combined with the political diatribe in her motions, demonstrates that Ms. Taitz’s purpose is to advance a political agenda and not to pursue a legitimate legal cause of action. Rather than citing to binding legal precedent, she calls the President names, accuses the undersigned of treason, and gratuitously slanders the President’s father.”

Judge land makes it quite clear why Taitz was sanctioned and fined. Yet in all of her appeals she does nothing to address or defend the actual issues of her incompetent behavior, but rather continues to blast Obama and blames everything on what she calls Obama’s “illegitimate status” and his “criminal activity”, and this massive conspiracy she claims is going on. None of which she has the slightest bit of actual evidence for.

Well, I don’t imagine it will take long for the SCOTUS to kick her and her time and resource wasting appeals quest to the curb. It seems that she may be having some anxiety about it. Yesterday she also posted:

“Attorneys and civil rights leaders like me were viciously attacked for the last two and a half years in a massive push to aid and abet this massive elections fraud and treason committed by Obama and his accomplices in the top positions of power. I don’t trust the Supreme Court in upholding their oath of office and protectinfg and defending the Constitution. If the Supreme Court does not act on January the 7th, I urge all of my supporters to engage in a massive campaign of in person lobbying or writing to each and every member of Congress and demanding investigation of ObamaFraud Gate, Obama SS fraud gate and persecution of political dissidents like Lakin and Fitzgerald. Please, remind them, that we put them there and we can remove them from there, that by their inaction they engage in treason against the American people.”

Again as usual, anyone that does not agree with her, or rule in her favor is guilty of aiding and abetting and of treason.

Mark your calendars, Friday’s the day and keep the popcorn handy.

3 comments:

  1. What's hilarious about this is that Orly will most likely file a motion for reconsideration when this is denied.

    Orly Taitz. The absolutely, positively worst attorney in the entire universe - the gift that keeps on giving.

    It is certainly entertaining to watch her continue to fail.

    ReplyDelete
  2. LawyerwitharealdegreeJanuary 8, 2011 at 12:14 PM

    And her frivolous Petition for a Writ of Certiorari did not appear on the SCOTUS orders list yesterday. On Monday, it will be on the list they issue, in big letters, DENIED.

    It's too bad they won't sanction her further and kick her out of the SCOTUS bar. Hopefully the CA Bar will get off it's lazy duff sometime in this decade.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Denied as expected.
    No surprise.

    ReplyDelete