Saturday, September 25, 2010

Orly Taitz’s Endless Load Of Hogwash

I swear Orly Taitz believes that “Denial” is just a river in Egypt. She’s filed yet another “Reply To Opposition”  in Taitz v Obama.

TAITZ v OBAMA (QUO WARRANTO) - 36 - REPLY to opposition to motion - gov.uscourts.dcd.140567.36.0

Now she’s a victim of “telephone justice” and claims:

“Taitz has presented a mountain of evidence showing that Obama committed fraud in his assertion of eligibility to U. S. presidency. Evidence previously submitted include the transcript of the March 25 th session of the Assembly of Kenya, when James Orengo, Minister of Lands, clearly stated that Obama was born in Kenya.”

Actually the only thing she has presented is the same ole same ole mountains of unsubstantiated hogwash and hearsay that shows up in every thing she files. However, James Orengo did say in the March 25th transcript she is referring to that indeed Obama was born in Kenya. But, after the birferverse when nuts with that statement he quickly came out and stated that he was referring to Obama Sr. Of course that bit of information was completely ignored.

As for her “New Evidence” in regard to Ann Dunham’s passport application that she claims proves that Obama’s name was changed to “Soebarkah” is nothing but pure speculation. She states:

“Newly discovered passport records for his mother show him listed in her passport under last name Soebarkah”.

Actually no, he is in fact listed there as Barack Obama. The word, or name Soebarkah is written beside his name and then it was crossed out. That is not proof of shit, nor is anyone able to explain what that was supposed to mean.

Orly’s Logical deduction?

“Obama had an intent to defraud. Newly discovered passport records for his mother show him listed in her passport under last name Soebarkah. Clearly Obama knew those facts. Obama came back from Indonesia to the U.S. not as an infant, but rather at age 10. Clearly he knew that he went by a different last name in Indonesia.”

Clearly? Trying to follow Orly logic is “clearly” like trying to follow the logic in this scene from the “Princess Bride”

The only thing I can see “clearly” is that nothing in this “reply to opposition” is worth the paper it’s written on.

And WTF is this all about?

“Good Samaritan theory
When someone commits fraud and sells to a hospital expired or tainted medications, a doctor believing that medication was valid,- will give it to a patient. If a patient end’s up with severe complications or dies, then the distributor will be liable for damages suffered due to fraud. If manufacturer or distributor of a fire extinguisher commits fraud and sells an extinguisher that he knows to be defective, he will be liable not only to the buyer of such extinguisher and inhabitants of the house, but also to the Good Samaritans, who got injured, trying to rescue such inhabitants from the burning house. As Taitz argued in her motion, she acted as a good Samaritan, as a rescuer, who worked pro bono and represented members of the U.S. military, seeking to protect the US Constitution and their Constitutional rights.”

RRRIGHT! She’s on the Looney Tune trail again!

Orly Taitz is just about as sharp and to the point as Vicky Pollard:

Need I say more?

(I think they must have been separated at birth!)

The bottom line is that if this (so-called) "telephone justice" was the truly the case with Taitz, her sorry ass would have been locked in an Obot FEMA concentration camp long ago. Or in a padded room in some state hospital somewhere. She can spout her bullshit till the cows come home, but it will not change the truth. And the truth is the sanctions Judge Land hit her with had nothing to do with anything done by Obama, nor does it give her any standing to appeal this case.

She was sanctioned because of her own arrogant and incompetent courtroom behavior. Anyone with a lick of sense can see that she has behaved the exact same way with every judge that has slapped her down and kicked her nonsense to the curb. Which of course is every judge she’s ever been in front of.

For Gawd’s sake, claiming that Obama is responsible for her being sanctioned and fined by Land is about as lame as trying to prove Obama is also responsible for every speeding ticket she’s ever gotten. I just wonder how long before Judge Lamberth gets sick of her shit and slaps her with even more sanctions. He’s already denied this case twice, and I have no doubt that the courts have more important things to do then play Pete and Re-Pete with Taitz and her left field court filings.

Sunday, September 5, 2010

“Paging Dr. Freud”

From Crooks & Liars

Read the story “Here”

I loved it!