Saturday, July 31, 2010

Lindsey Graham On Immigration

Now I have to say, on this one it’s time for a little Ms Daisy bipartisanship. I agree with his idea that it may just be time to amend the 14th Amendment.

When it was ratified in 1868 (142 years ago) there were some serious issues going on. The slaves had been declared free, now they were people, not chattel but they had never been made citizens in this country. It’s quite certain you would have been hard pressed to find any slaves that would have come here willingly so it was through no fault of their own that they ended up here, they were a people, (finally) but with no home.

Today it’s a different story. Mexicans “do” come here on their own, they do it illegally and they have a definite plan. I mean for Gawd sakes in many cases they wait until they are in labor and make a mad dash.

A few years ago I worked with a nurse who came from Texas. She was an OB Nurse in a hospital not far from the border, (though I can’t remember where exactly). But she had some wild stories and told me that they delivered a hell of a lot of illegal babies. (Her biggest complaint was all the paperwork it created.)

On that specific issue I have to say, times have changed. They are not being brought here in chains and sold as chattel. They come on their own, many come pregnant planning to drop an anchor baby, and they’ve dropped millions of them. I don’t think that is anything near what they had in mind at the time with regard to what the 14th Amendment was intended to do.

Times have changed, so have the circumstances, and over the years there have been changes to the Constitution to keep up with it all. I think it’s time we take a look at this. We should evaluate what effect changing the 14th Amendment to restrict citizenship to babies born with at least one parent that has legal citizenship would be.

My opinion is that it could be a good step forward in getting (some) control of the borders. If they know the anchors won’t catch bottom, maybe they won’t try so hard to come over here to drop them.

Friday, July 30, 2010

Orly Taitz, Poking A Hornet’s Nest

On the immigration front Judge Susan Bolton put the kybosh on the more controversial parts of Arizona’s Immigration reform bill that would no doubt lead to profiling. While I agree that something needs to be done about stopping the flow of illegal immigrants into this country, as well as finding a way to deal with the ones already here. I can’t say that having the Arizona police force pulling people over and saying; “Papers Please” is the best way to do it. Yet all these right-wingers out there that are depicting Obama as being the “Nazi” are shitting themselves to have that actually be enforced.

And our favorite Birfer Orly Taitz goes on a roll:

“Comment from Orly:
This might be a precursor to Civil war. It shows a complete detachment between the federal government, including Federal Judiciary and majority of people in this Nation. With massive elections fraud that we have seen, we can’t make any change to the type of politicians being elected. I believe, the only alternative to full blown civil war, is filing a quo warranto on behalf of the state of AZ and other states, that support AZ.
As I’ve been saying for a year and a half, it is a complete idiocy to fight different laws and executive orders by Obama, without addressing the root of the problem, his illegitimacy for US presidency. There is a lot of corruption at the top of both major parties. Republican leadership refused to address this problem and here are the results. I have stated, that the state of AZ needs to demand a jury trial on all issue including Quo Warranto. I am confident, that the jury would have decided for AZ. This was not done as well, and here is a result. They have to bring Quo Warranto and they have to demand a jury trial.”

Full blown civil war? I swear she is still doing her damnedest to get one started. I can’t think of anything that would make her happier. Of course the entire immigration problem only became a problem when Obama was elected, as was the case with every other problem in this country. It’s all Obama’s fault! Of course in the rest of the post, she returns to her quest with the SCOTUS.

“In regards to my Application for stay, I talked to the clerks office of the Supreme Court. One of the clerks, who refused to give out his name, stated that the clerk for the stays, Danny Bickel, is too busy and can’t talk to me, but that he is returning my application sent to Justice Alito without docketing it and without giving it to Alito. I asked, why. This is totally against the rules, as one can resubmit the application, if one justice denies it. Theoretically I can resubmit it 9 times. The clerk refused to give me any answer and slammed the phone in my face.”

I’d probably “slam the phone in her face” too. I have no doubt that she was badgering the poor clerk to death without allowing him to get a single word in. She simply has no clue that the SCOTUS has more important things to do than deal with her and her bullshit.

“Meanwhile, I got a confirmation from the Public integrity unit of the Department of Justice, they got my complaint, they are supposed to investigate and prosecute public corruption. They have put in prison some corrupt judges, never mind clerks, however, keep in mind, that though theoretically they have to be independent, they are run by Obama appointee, so I don’t now, what will they do.You can call the office of the Inspector General of the Department of Justice and Public Integrity unit of the Department of Justice and demand an immediate investigation.”

They’ll probably do the same thing everyone else does with her complaints; put them in “File 13”, (aka the trash can) And of course she continues to stir up the crazy pot in her ultimate quest for sedition and full blown civil war. In the comments we find:

“Stephen July 28th, 2010 @ 11:52 am
Usurping the office of President by fraud or any other means is, in effect, an act of war, a coup de tat, against the United States of America and our Constitution. Obama is guilty of treason. Treason is a capital crime. Covering up treason is also treason. Treason is epidemic among those elected to represent us and the Dept of Justice entrusted with upholding the law. It saddens me that the corruption has become almost 100%. There is no vote. There is no redress. I believe the point of no return has been reached. The Federal govt has declared war upon States rights and the Constitution as a whole. The time for secession is upon us. And sadly, I believe that it will not go without civil conflict.”

“Myron July 28th, 2010 @ 12:44 pm
Lady Liberty, This is outrageous. You need to serve the justices your pleadings at their homes. At least that will guarantee that they read them.”

Now there’s a great idea, stalking the Supreme Court Justices in the privacy of their homes. That’ll get their attention PDQ!

“G Mike July 28th, 2010 @ 2:29 pm
Civil war would be fine with me. I am almost 100% sure that obama will issue blanket amnesty now for all illegals in this country either before the november election this year, but certainly before his reelection date in 2012. Thanks for trying, Orly, but this country is DONE. Stick a fork in it. Where the HELL can I go from here?”

“Porkrind July 28th, 2010 @ 2:35 pm
Dr. Taitz – can’t you get the UN to intervene on your behalf? It seems to me that having the sanctions removed is a much more important task for them to handle than anything other thing happening in this world. It is the ultimate atrocity that you can get any relief! When ever you’re ready to take up arms, you just let me know. I will fight by your side and sit with you in any foxhole because you are Lady Liberty!”

Right, there is nothing the United Nations has to do in the whole world more important than to rescue Orly from being sanctioned for her arrogant ignorance.

“Hippybiker July 28th, 2010 @ 4:26 pm
The only thing a Tyrant understands is gratuitous violence and lots of it. That is what King George and his forces learned the hard way. Don’t ever think that it can’t happen again, All one needs to do is read The Declaration Of Independence, our original founding document; which by the way, has never been revoked.”

Gratuitous violence? And on another post Porkrind plays the racist card.

“Porkrind July 27th, 2010 @ 4:48 pm
You need to put the numbers for SCOTUS up at the top of your page in addition to the names of the clerks that we need to talk to when we call. The addresses should be posted to. It is time we bombard them with calls and letters. If anyone lives in the area, please go to the court to find out what is going on. Dr. Orly should get on a plane right away and visit them. I don’t see how we can stop these people from their flagrant flaunting of our laws. If we don’t come together now and fight as a whole, our cause will be lost forever and we will be a nation run by tar babys! IT IS TIME FOR US TO MAKE A STAND. DO IT TOMORROW AND EVERY DAY UNTIL WE GET ANSWERS!!!!”

A nation run by Tar Babies? God Forbid! Well, post the phone numbers and addresses she did, and she’s calling out the flying monkey squad to bombard the SC.

“Posted on July 27, 2010
you can reach the Supreme Court at 202-xxx-xxxx 202-xxx-xxxx and demand an answer, why didn’t they docket resubmission brief, which was confirmed as received by the clerk’s office. In my resubmission to Alito, just like in the original to Thomas (whose signature is missing on the order to deny) I am asking to stay the sanctions and to grant me limited discovery to prove, that my legal action was not frivolous. I will be seeking Obama’s vital records in such discovery.”

I still believe her rage over these sanctions and her desperation to have them over turned are somehow tied the complaints against her with the CA Bar. Judge Land forwarded a copy of his order, and the sanctions to the CA Bar, and shortly after that Orly was “called to the principals office”. She has been going on and on about how crooked the court is and how it has nothing to do with her actions, that “she” has done nothing wrong. I think it’s possible the Bar gave her one last chance to prove herself and appeal the sanctions before they slap her down.

Well, lets have a look at what actually transpired and resulted in those sanctions in the first place.

On Sept 4, 09 Orly filed a “Motion for a TRO by Connie Rhodes”.   Of course challenging the legitimacy of Rhodes’s military orders for deployment to Iraq, given that Obama is “illegitimate”. It was 63 pages of “yada, yada, de facto President, yada yada. After much ado, her court date arrives on 9/14/09, and thanks to our friends at Politijab we have the “official transcript”  of that hearing. It’s long, but entertaining. It might be worth printing off to keep in your bathroom for the next time you need to take a dump, but here are a few highlights. On page 17 enters the famous forged “Kenyan Birth Certificate”. By page 18 defense attorney Ms. Ausprung butts in; “Objection, Your Honor. The witness… The Court: Sustained.” The case goes on through left field, right field and round the bend. On page 27 we have this exchange:

Taitz: "And I submit to you, Your Honor, that, in light of the fact that Mr. Obama has never provided any, any of his vital records, and now we have received a declaration, under penalty of perjury, that is part of the record in this case, together with Mr. Obama's birth certificate from Kenya, shows -- THE COURT: Explain to me the procedure that you contend you have followed in authenticating this document that you suggest is his actual birth certificate from the records in Kenya. MS. TAITZ: Well -- THE COURT: I have seen the document and, you know, it's got a name, Barack Obama, II, or something to that effect; and then it purports to list his parents; and then it purports to have a baby's footprint. But what have you done in the record here to establish the authenticity of that such that the Court should even consider it? MS. TAITZ: Well –"

So you get the idea, and of course we all know that she has never “verified” anything. And that Kenyan BC bombshell of hers ultimately got the prize for forgery of the year. Two days later Judge Land issued his Denial.  Here’s an excerpt:

“Finally, in a remarkable shifting of the traditional legal burden of proof, Plaintiff unashamedly alleges that Defendant has the burden to prove his “natural born” status. Thus, Plaintiff’s counsel, who champions herself as a defender of liberty and freedom, seeks to use the power of the judiciary to compel a citizen, albeit the President of the United States, to “prove his innocence” to “charges” that are based upon conjecture and speculation. Any middle school civics student would readily recognize the irony of abandoning fundamental principles upon which our Country was founded in order to purportedly “protect and preserve” those very principles.”

And the one sentence in the order that pissed her off more than anything else:

“Unlike in Alice in Wonderland, simply saying something is so does not make it so.”

This is where Orly pissed in her own cereal. The very next day “she fired off”  her motion to reconsider. Excerpts:

“Plaintiff avers that there is increasing evidence that the United States District Courts in the 11th Circuit are subject to political pressure, external control, and, mostly likely, subservience to the same illegitimate chain of command which Plaintiff has previously protested in this case, except that the de facto President is not even nominally the Commander-in-Chief of the Article III Judiciary.”

“The fact that the Court’s 14 page order does not address any actual statements in Plaintiff’s complaint by page or paragraph number, or any page citation to her TRO, suggests to a reasonable and objective mind that the Court either did not read these documents or was summarily instructed by that same illegitimate “chain of command” alleged above not to address at least the three key questions asserted in Plaintiff’s complaint”

“It is reasonably certain that the men who framed the Constitution did not anticipate the election of a man as a President who appears to have prevaricated about his place of birth and then ordered his loyal followers to ridicule all those who questioned the contradictions inherent in his own biography, such as the obvious fact that his Father was an (admittedly disloyal and possibly treacherous) Subject of the British Crown when he was born, even though this fact alone would disqualify the President as a “natural born citizen”, regardless of his place of birth.”

“The fact that the President has admitted his Father was not a citizen, but a British Subject, at the time of birth, is an incontrovertible fact, which supports Plaintiff’s charges that the President is an alien. The Court’s opinion ridicules this point, along with the evidence that “the President is either a wandering nomad or a prolific identity fraud crook,”

Well, balls the size of coconuts it is! The day after she fired off that little “Fuck You AND that dog you rode in here” to Judge Land, she was “fired”  by her client Connie Rhodes. Judge land “denied”  her motion to consider, and ordered her to show cause why she shouldn’t be sanctioned.

Well WTF? How dare anyone speak to “Lady Liberty” that way! So instead of showing cause, Orly filed a “Motion for Recusal”  and that certainly went over about as well as a fart in church. And what do you know, Bam! Judge Land smacked Orly right up side the head with “Sanctions”  and doubled her fine to $20,000 for her absolute arrogance and complete ignorance of the law and courtroom procedure. This is the order that was forwarded to the CA Bar.

So it would be plain as day to anyone reading these documents that her conduct is completely indefensible. Yet she is determined to do herself in by now badgering the SCOTUS with nothing but a continuation of the same shit that landed her ass in the hot seat to begin with. That and her public calls for sedition and armed revolt against the United States.

She is poking a hornet’s nest here and it’s not going to be much longer before they swarm her ass and either have her locked up in a jail cell for contempt, or a padded room somewhere!

I vote for the jail cell!

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Orly Taitz, Inching Her Way To Disbarment

She apparently has her drawers in a big knot over the fact that Justice Thomas did not personally sign the order denying her plea for “emergency stay” of the sanctions against her by Judge Land. On her website she posted:

“According to the clerks office: there is no order signed by justice Thomas
Posted on July 26, 2010
Today, 07.26.10 at 8:15 PST/11:15 EST I talked to the clerks office of the Supreme Court of the United States, with an employee of the Clerks office by name Eric Fossum. I requested a copy of the order actually signed by Justice Thomas, denyng my application for stay of sanctions in Rhodes v MacDonald #10A56. Mr. Eric Fossum admitted that there is no order actually signed by Justice Thomas. He stated that it was reviewed by his chambers and denied. Not only they are not even claiming that Justice Thomas ever signed the order to deny my application, now they are not even claiming that he ever saw the application, now they are saying that it was reviewed by his chambers, meaning there is no evidence that it was ever reviewed by Justice Thomas himself. So who reviewed it and denied? A clerk? A piece of furniture in the chambers? This is totally outrageous. This is a complete violation of my constitutional rights for due process and equal protection under the law under the 14th Amendment, and it was done under the color of Authority by the employees of the clerks office of the Supreme Court of the United States.”

Followed by:

“I mailed 3 books that included a brief of about 30 pages and exhibits, that included some 270 pages. There was supposed to be an original and 2 copies. The clerk for the stays, Danny Bickel, was supposed to log it and forward it to Justice Thomas. After Justice Thomas read the brief, he could do one of 3 things:
1. grant the petition
2. deny the patition
3. forward it to the conference of all 9 Justices.
No matter what he decided, he personally was supposed to sign it either in a separate order or on the cover page of the brief. It was never done, hence there is no evidence that Justice Thomas ever read one single word of what I’ve written. Log of the Supreme court, contains a chronological account of orders issued. I does not contain my case. when I talked to the employee of the clerk’s office Eric Fossum, he was very careful in telling me that my brief was reviewed in Thomas’s chambers. He didn’t say it was reviewed by him. The same thing happened with my recent application for stay, that I filed with the Supreme Court of CA. Response that I got does not contain any signature of the judge or the clerk.

Well, I wonder if she ever actually read the original order buy Judge Land; if she had she may understand why it may have been tossed by Justice Thomas’s “Chamber”. I’m sure they read it and they are probably still laughing.

In her plea to Thomas she stated: 

“It was not a case of anything improper done by the counsel, rather it was an attempt by judge Clay D. Land to silence and intimidate Taitz, as well as other attorneys, an attempt to instill fear in each and every attorney, who dared to bring an action on behalf of members of the US military challenging Barack Hussein Obama’s complete illegitimacy for the US presidency. She is seeking a stay and reversal of sanctions, as well as limited rule 11 discovery, to show that her actions were not frivolous, but rather reasonable and justified, that is not only not frivolous, but is the most important case today and possibly most important in US history, as sanctions were asserted to obfuscate illegitimacy of Barack Hussein Obama for US presidency. Land’s order can only be characterized as a legal “hit job”.

Actually, it was exactly her “improper” behavior that caused Judge Land to sanction her.

He wrote:

“Instead of arguing pertinent legal authority supporting her position, counsel reverted to “press conference mode,” repeating political “talking points” that did not answer the Court’s questions or address the Court’s concerns. Specifically, counsel was unable to explain why this Court should not abstain from deciding this case based upon well-established precedent, and she was unable to articulate clearly how the alleged “cloud” on the President’s place of birth amounted to a violation of her client’s individual constitutional rights. Rather than address these two important questions, counsel retreated to her political rhetoric. When the Court admonished her for not addressing the legal issues presented by her Complaint, counsel accused the Court of unfairly badgering her and implored the Court to ask Defendants’ counsel questions instead of her. Ms. Taitz’s performance confirmed to the Court that her focus was not to pursue a legitimate legal cause of action to obtain relief for her client but was to use the Court to force the President to produce a “birth certificate” satisfactory to her and her followers. Her other purpose appeared to be to use litigation as a means of drawing attention to her political agenda. During the hearing, Plaintiff’s counsel threatened that if she did not get the opportunity to obtain the relief she sought (discovery of a birth certificate),then a wave of subsequent similar actions would be filed in this Court until she obtained what she wanted.”

Pretty cut and dried if you ask me. It is blatantly obvious that in every breath Orly takes, and certainly in every “brief” she files regardless of whatever alleged issue she claims to be arguing, her bottom line is Obama, Obama, Obama. I’m sure given her legal competence level, researching actual “facts” about anything is irrelevant, however I have no doubt that even the Supreme Court housekeeping staff would have had enough sense to read Judge Lands order for themselves to see what transpired and not just take Orly’s rants as gospel.

It’s amazing that she still has no friggin clue. Her brief to Justice Thomas was titled “Application for emergency stay and/or injunctions Re; Sanctions”. Now one would assume that that meant she intended to provide evidence that her court conduct did not warrant the sanctions against her. But in reality, (a place she has no concept of) she proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that the sanctions were indeed justified by continuing the same rants and diatribe that caused the sanctions in the first place.

Judge Land stated:

Her response to the Court’s show cause order is breathtaking in its arrogance and borders on delusional. She expresses no contrition or regret regarding her misconduct. To the contrary, she continues her baseless attacks on the Court. Defiantly defending the “position of the patriots,” she scoffs at the notion that a federal court would consider sanctioning her when she is on the side of such freedom fighters as the late Justice Thurgood Marshall, a comparison that, if accepted, would disgrace Justice Marshall’s singular achievements. Counsel’s bad faith warrants a substantial sanction.
Counsel’s misconduct was not an isolated event; it was part of a pattern that advanced frivolous arguments and disrespectful personal attacks on the parties and the Court. This pattern infected the entire proceeding, not just an isolated pleading. Her initial Complaint was legally frivolous. Upon being so informed, counsel followed it with a frivolous motion for reconsideration. In response to the Court’s show cause order, she filed a frivolous motion to recuse. In all of counsel’s frivolous filings, she hurled personal insults at the parties and the Court. Rather than assert legitimate legal arguments, counsel chose to accuse the Court of treason and of being controlled by the “Obama Machine.” She had no facts to support her claims–but her diatribe would play well to her choir. This pattern of conduct reveals that it will be difficult to get counsel’s attention. A significant sanction is necessary to deter such conduct.”

Yet she continues the same ole same ole in her plea to Justice Thomas:

“Allowing sanctions by judge Land to stand, will signify beginning of tyranny in the United states of America and end to the Constitutional Republic which is the foundation of this nation. The question is as follows: “If the judiciary can sanction an attorney for bringing an action to uphold a Constitutional right, what is next? Will FEMA camps be turned into the next GULAG? Will we see a wave of political assassinations of dissidents, as were seen in numerous totalitarian regimes around the World, such as regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq or regime of Mahmud Ahmadinejad in Iran?” This is the most dangerous road a judiciary can take. When judiciary is pandering to an illegitimate dictator, who sits in the White House, using a Social Security number of another individual and not having a valid long form birth certificate, the country descends into tyranny.”

And you have to love this bit:

“Actions by Judge Land were akin to Aiding and Abetting Felony and Misprision of felony.”

That is exactly what she accuses EVERYONE of that does not agree with her. She even threw the same shit at Justice Thomas:

“If this court does not reverse such sanctions and does not order an independent investigation, this court will be guilty of aiding and abetting all of the felonies committed by Obama. This court will be guilty of misprision of multiple felonies.”

And she wonders why this raving insanity never made it past Justice Thomas’s Chamber? Contrary to whatever she thinks or believes, legal authorities have verified that Obama is in fact a legal NBC and all of this so called “evidence” of hers is nothing but debunked internet gossip and hearsay for which there IS NO credible evidence. She did nothing to defend her courtroom behavior as being justified, but continued showing her ass and ranting on and on about Obama.

Orly Taitz is a disgrace to the legal profession and I can’t image they will let her continue as a member of the CA Bar for very much longer. She now claims to have re-filed the same plea she sent to Thomas to Justice Alito. And we are still waiting to see what if any response she gets from Chief Justice Roberts on her demands for him to allow her to come to the SC and do her own investigation of their records, systems and staff.

Judge Land was wrong about one thing. He stated in reference to her response that it was “breathtaking in its arrogance and borders on delusional”. The truth is she is way passed the border on being delusional if she thinks for one minute that she is going to get anything out of all this, other than possibly disbarment and a mandatory psyche exam.

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Lawdy Lawd, Balls The Size Of Coconuts

On July 7th Orly Taitz posted her “Application for emergency stay/or injunction as to the sanctions” she filed with the SCOTUS and addressed to Justice Clarence Thomas on her website along with this little note:

“Full brief with attachments is about 300 pages. We can have it copied, made in a book form, autographed and mailed to you for a minimum donation of a $100 or more. It will help cover our costs and fees and will help Dr. Taitz to continue fighting for your freedoms and for your children’s future.”

Of course anyone dumb enough to pay $100 for the same stupid shit she’s been posting, emailing, and snail mailing all over the place for the last 2 years is on their own. As they say; “A fool and his money soon part”.

On July 15th the (not surprising) denial of her application was posted on the SCOTUS website:

“No. 10A56
Orly Taitz, Applicant v. Thomas D. MacDonald, Colonel Garrison Commander, Fort Benning, et al.
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Case Nos.: (09-15418)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jul 8 2010 Application (10A56) for a stay, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Jul 15 2010 Application (10A56) denied by Justice Thomas.”

So on July 19th she posted her “update” to the international criminal bar panel and the office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. It begins:

“Dear Laura,
please read the following update of my prior filing with the international criminal bar please forward it to the members of the bar and UN Security Council
Currently we have the following flagrant violations of Human rights:”

This was followed by her whole long list of “Poor Pitiful Persecuted Me”, but we’ll just skip to numbers 14, 15 and 16 (of 21)

“14. On July 4 2010 Taitz filed with the Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Clatrence Thomas her application for stay of $20,000 of sanctions assessed against he by Judge Clay D. Land for representing active members of US military demanding verification of Obama’s legitimacy.
15. On Friday July 16, 2010, around nine PM EST Taitz checked the docket of the Supreme Court and found no decision on her application for stay. She issued a press release, that went to numerous media outlets around the World, stating that no decision was made on he application for stay.
16. On Saturday July 17. 2010 Taitz started getting comments on her web site/blog, stating that Justice Thomas has denied her application on July 15th. Taitz checked the docket and saw that the entry was made on Saturday, July 17th, when the Supreme Court was closed, but it was backdated for Thursday the 15th.”

The next day on July 20, she fires off another one, this time to Chief Justice Roberts:

APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY STAY AND/OR INJUNCTION AS TO THE sanctions originally submitted to Justice Clarence Thomas
Background of the request and statement of facts
1 On July 8 2010 Application for stay of sanctions 10A524 was docketed with the Supreme Court and addressed to Honorable Justice Clarence Thomas.
2. On July 16, Friday 2010, around 9PM EST Applicant Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq (hereinafter Taitz) checked the electronic docket of the Supreme court, it showed no answer from Clarence Thomas.”

(If she was checking for the docket number she listed here, she was looking in the wrong place, the actual docket number was 10A56)

“3. On the same day Taitz has issued a press release, stating that there is no answer from Justice Thomas. Above press release was sent to some 28,000 media outlets and some 300,000 individuals."

(By “press release” I guess she means she posted a blurb on her website)

“4. On Saturday July 17, 2010 Taitz started getting comments on her website from some Obama supporters gloating about the fact that Justice Thomas dismissed her application. Originally, Taitz dismissed those as a dumb joke, but as those comments continued, she checked the electronic docket of the Supreme Court and to her amazement found, that somebody made a new entry on Saturday July 17, 2010, and backdated it for Thursday the 15th of July, stating that Justice Thomas dismissed her application."

(Right, it suddenly appeared on a Saturday and was backdated by “someone”. Could she have been looking for the wrong docket number? Nahhh!)

"5. On Saturday the court was closed, Justices and clerks were not there, therefore the applicant has reasonable belief and suspicion, that above entry was not authorized.”

(Damn, Go Sherlock !)

“6. There appears to be a pattern of docket entries made or deletions of entries from the docket done when the Supreme Court is closed.
7. On January 7, 2009 Your Honor reviewed another application for stay filed by Taitz on behalf of her clients: 08A524 Lightfoot v Bowen. Your Honor distributed above application to be heard in the conference of the full court on January 23, 2010.
8. This case was followed by a number of citizens with great interest, as it dealt with Barack Hussein Obama’s illegitimacy to US presidency.
9. Some 360,000 US citizens have filed a petition by Net world Daily magazine, that was addressed to Justices, asking them to hear the case on the merits."

(Except for the fact that none of these cases have any merits)

"10. Before inauguration, on January 19, 2010 Aplication 08A524 was on the docket of the Supreme Court.
11. On January 21, 2009, when Supreme Court was reopened for business after inauguration, and two days before the scheduled conference, application was not there, it was deleted by someone, as if it never existed.
12. Numerous outraged citizens, including members of the media and state representatives, called the Supreme Court and demanded to re-enter the application on the docket.
13. On January 22, 2009 Taitz received a phone call from a stays clerk, Danny Bickel, who asked Taitz to tell her supporters not to contact the Supreme Court, he stated that application was never deleted. Taitz responded that she has affidavits and screen shots from her supporters, showing that the case disappeared. At that time Mr. Bickel stated that it was a computer problem, that affected all the cases. Taitz responded, that this statement is not true either, as she has an affidavit from Attorney Theresa Ward, ESq, member of the bar of the Supreme Court, who could see other cases on the docket, but Taitz case was not there. Ms. Ward called the Supreme Court and complained. At that point Mr. Bickel stated that the case will be re-entered within an hour and asked Taitz to contact her supporters and ask them not to contact the Supreme Court, as the problem was fixed. Above conversation happened on January 22, at the end of the day, while the conference of all nine justices was supposed to be the next morning.
14. On January 23, 2009 all nine justices supposedly discussed the case.
15. On January 26, 2009 it was announced that the justices decided not to proceed with oral argument.
16. On March 9, 2009 Justice Scalia was giving a lecture and signing his books in Los Angeles.
17. Taitz attended the lecture, asked Justice Scalia questions during Q and A and later at the book signing asked Justice Scalia, why the case was not heard in oral argument, why wasn’t it heard on the merits. To her amazement, Justice Scalia had no clue the case even existed, he could not remember one word, one thing about the case. When Taitz asked Justice Scalia about other similar cases, he could not remember a thing either, even though he was supposedly the Justice, who referred some of those cases to the conference in the first place, which means that he supposedly read those cases more than once.
Currently, there is a clear pattern of entries being made on the docket of the Supreme Court, or entries or even cases deleted, when the court is closed and the Justices and the clerks are not there.”

(That, or she fucked up and was looking in the wrong place. And maybe what she considers the most important case in American history was dismissed as nothing but delusional fantasy by Justice Scalia. Nahhhh!)

“While it is not uncommon for the clerks to make entries a day or two after the order was made, it is uncommon to do it when the court is closed. It is more unlikely for such entry to be made on an inauguration day, when all the Justices were not there and could be seen on TV attending the inauguration. Supreme Court is not a city bus, when one can go in and out any time he feels like. Supreme Court has tight security, and there were situations where cases were held for nearly a month, when it was told to the applicants, that the documents are undergoing Anthrax scan. It is highly imptobable, that someone would be working in the Supreme Court, when it is closed, particularly on inauguration day.
It is also of concern, that Justice Scalia could not remember any of the cases dealing with legitimacy of Barack Obama, particularly in light of the fact that at the lecture he gave on March 9, 2009 he stated that the Justices pick for oral argument cases not based on beauty of writing or legal argument, but based on importance to the country. What can be more important than legitimacy of a person sitting in the position of the president and Commander in Chief?
Of Additional concern is the fact that in both cases unexplained activity happened, when the cases were to the detriment of Mr. Obama, stating that he was not eligible to the presidency due to the fact that he had foreign allegiance and citizenship and due to the fact that he refused and still refuses to unseal his original birth certificate, and the short version received does not show the name of the hospital or doctor or signatures. Taitz also provided information, that the social security number used by Mr. Obama, 042-68-xxxx, was issued in the state of CT, while he resided in Hi, and it was issued to an elderly individual, born in 1890.
Points and authorities
Taitz cannot provide any points and authorities, as nothing like that ever happened in the Supreme Court and Taitz is requesting your Honor to review the above Motion as the matter of first impression.”

(I’m sure nothing like Orly Taitz has ever happened to the Supreme Court, and to prove it here’s where she starts batting her coconut sized balls around!)

“Relief requested
Taitz is requesting an appointment to visit the Supreme Court with a forensic document expert (to be identified at a later date) and view the orders pertaining to her cases and verify and clarify, that there is a valid signature of Justice Thomas and his clerk on the denial of application 10A56, entered on the Docket on Saturday 17, 2010.
Taitz is requesting an appointment to visit the Supreme Court with a forensic document expert and verify that there genuine signatures of all nine Justices on the denial of her case 08A524 discussed in conference on January 23, 2009.
Taitz is requesting your Honor to grant her and her computer security expert (to be identified at a later date) access to the electronic docket of the cases pertaining to her and her clients, in order to ascertain who made an entry in the docket 10A56 on Saturday, July 17, 2010 and who deleted the Application 08A 524 from the docket of the Supreme Court and whether such person was authorized to make such changes to the docket.
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ 07.20.10.”

So… She is “requesting” that Justice Roberts allow her and her “investigators” to come to the SC and wants him to give her access to their documents, to their computer systems, and allow her to investigate their staff!

WTF? Does she really think that the SCOTUS is going to open the door and let her lunatic ass any where near their files, systems or staff?

When Hell freezes over!

I can’t wait for the reply to this one!

Monday, July 19, 2010

Orly Taitz, Dumb As A Box Of Rocks But Takes A Licking And Keeps On Ticking

Orly, chronic loser is still batting a thousand in that arena is now shouting; “Remember the Alamo!” Her appeal to Justice Clarence Thomas of the SCOTUS in an effort to avoid having to pay the $20,000 fine she was slapped with, Denied. As well as Taitz v. Bowen that was filed in the Supreme Court of California, also Denied. (What a putz!)

On July 10th she posted on her website:

“5 reasons, why I represent the biggest threat to Obama regime
Posted on
July 10, 2010
Why the big mean machine of Obama regime goes after me with such viciousness?
1. While there were over 100 legal actions filed, and at least 15 different attorneys worked on them, I am the only attorney, who brought forward the issue of Social Security fraud, which is the most explosive and can lead to serious criminal indictments
2. I brought forward cases of active military
3. I can’t be bought
4. I don’t get intimidated by anything
5. I am relentless, i go 24/7/365 for as long as it takes until I win

More of her Birfer fantasy. Though it’s true that she isn’t intimidated by anything, especially not reality, and she is relentless. Chronic failure does nothing to slow her down.

So is her call to “Remember the Alamo” possibly her last resort at trying to start a Birther war and take this country away from that “Black Muslim Usurper? (I think she hates Muslims more than Mark Williams) She sure as hell isn’t getting anywhere with her same ole same ole.

“Remember the Alamo Posted on
July 17, 2010
How many people know that Texas won at San Jacindo, not Alamo?
We actually lost the Alamo battle, but the phrase “Remember the Alamo” lives on. What is important, is not winning the battle, but winning the war. We remember Valley Forge, yet it was not the great military victory.
George Washington lost most of his battles, but won the war.
What is important, is to have endurance and strength of character to keep fighting in spite of all odds, when you are greatly outnumbered, when you are attacked by the enemy or when you are attacked by corrupt politicians on both sides.
That is the reason, why we remember the Alamo, why we remember the Valley Forge, why Russians remember the Stalingrad.
Keep in mind, we have mostly garbage media today, that shows loads of trush. We hear about escapades of Lindsey Lohan, Paris Hilton or Kardashian sisters. They don’t report about the fact that the pres and Commander in Chief doesn’t even have a valid SS number of his own, that billions of dollars are being funneled to foreign banks from the US treasury.
Legal pleadings is a vehicle, that not only brings matters to court, but also brings awareness of the issues to the public, makes those issues part of the historical record.
Two years ago nobody dared to mention Obama’s eligibility. Now more people are more outspoken: we have congressmen and senators defending this issue. Two years ago nobody thought of states united, fighting the Federal government, yet they are doing it now. Arizona immigration issue, fight against Obamacare in FL, against Obama’s attack on US oil industry to benefit his foreign benefactors is being waged in LA and judge Martin Feldman already ruled against Obama and issued a stay on Obama ban on US offshore drilling. we now need citizens of LA and FL standing up to what was done to them by various bans inflicting by Obama and Ken Salazar. I need to hear from oilmen of LA and FL, who lost their ability to make a living and support their families because Obama regime is now quietly denying their drilling rights, I want to hear from CA farmers because Obama regime is denying their rights to farm.
Those stands and this endurance represent victories. I remember, that when Obama got elected everyone was extremely fearful. Now more people are standing up and speaking up. We’ve seen whistle blowers from the Department of Justice and HI registrar of voters.
I hope we will start seeing whistle blowers in the judiciary. Most clerks come from one or two large firms, that have a de facto monopoly on clerkships in Federal courts. They all seem to be connected. Just the way all of them suddenly knew today, on Saturday, about the posting in the Supreme court made today but dated retroactively for Thursday tells you there is a connection between many of these clerks. I hope we will have a whistle blower, who will expose to the public what is going on in the Federal judiciary, the way they are de fact committing treason to the Constitution by refusing to hear the most important issues of the Constitutional law.
It is mind boggling, to see the the level of corruption in the government, it is mind boggling, that a guy without a SS number of his own and a valid long form BC can sit in the White House for a year and a half and cause so much damage to the Nation. How can you stop fighting something that outrageous? To accept this, is like saying thank you to somebody spitting in your face.
First we accept illegitimate Obama, next we are told to accept a mosque at the World Trade center, next you are told to accept Obama shutting down all the oil and gas drilling, while importing oil and gas from offshore drilling in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Venezuella and Brazil. It is a slippery slope. ..
So remember the Alamo. You have to have endurance in fighting. We have to take the stand now. We have to draw a line in the sand. Illegitimate Obama sitting in the White House, and each and every judge saying: ”I have no jurisdiction to hear this on the merits”, is such a line in the sand. We can’t cross it. It is our Alamo of the 21 Century.
We have to demand paper ballot counting with voters being present. As I can see the whole system of elections is corrupt. There is a complete disconnect between voting and counting of ballots. This corrupt system of voting breeds corrupt politicians, who end up at the helm, they in turn appoint many corrupt judges, who issue orders denying any and all challenges by the citizenry against this corrupt system. And the circle is complete. If we don’t clean up the elections fraud, if we don’t brake the vicious cycle, if we don’t brake the matrix, things will get worse and worse.
So, remember the Alamo and please support my fight…”

“Support her fight”? Maybe she’s after more donations to help pay that fine that she just can’t seem to get out of paying. Actually, the judges do not “deny any and all challenges by the citizenry”. They just deny the incompetent ones made by people like Orly who truly believe they take internet gossip and hearsay, claim it to be fact without the slightest bit of “actual” proof and use it to remove a sitting president.

Dream On Orly! You go right ahead and draw that line in the sand. (I doubt anyone will really even notice.) Gather your army, you must have quite a force by now, (what, 20 or 30 troops?) and make your final stand. We’re looking forward to it! Your enemies are many and they await your charge!

Go Alvin!

It seems our buddy Alvin has finally come out of his shell.

Sunday, July 18, 2010

The Racist and Bigoted Mark Williams

There is no doubt that racism (and bigotry) lurk somewhere in every color, religion, ethnicity, and even class in this country. It is not, nor has it ever been confined to any one group, though some have been and continue to be much worse than others. Regardless of how much anyone denies it, it is still as prevalent today and it has always been, just maybe not on the same levels now that lynchings are illegal. And now that the NAACP has accused the Tea Parties of including and accepting racists, Tea Party leader Mark Williams turns and calls the NAACP racists and claims that the Tea Party is anything BUT racist.

Is that so? Well, lets have a look at Mr. Mark.

Mark “claims” to be ordained in the Universal Life Church, a church that “truly believes in freedom of religion”. Yet…

In May Mark Williams put a post on his website saying Muslims worship a “Monkey God”, which of course pissed off all the Muslims, and rightfully so. How do you suppose Mark would have reacted if the Muslims came out and cracked on the Tea Party Christians saying they worship a “Dead Jew On A Stick”? Do you think he would have taken very kindly to that? I doubt it! A bit of bigotry there? Uh, Yep! Is this his idea of respecting Muslim’s right to freedom of religion? Hardly, it’s a blatantly bigoted and nasty comment from a hateful man.

He also claims that Obama has instituted a "white people tax". (WTF)

But the crème da la crème is his reply to the NAACP’s charge that the Tea Parties have accepted racists into their ranks. This is copied directly from his website, but has since been taken down. (Probably after the Tea Party Federation expelled him for such offensive remarks)

"Colored People change minds about emancipation
July 14th, 2010
NAACP President Precious Ben’s letter to Lincoln:

Dear Mr. Lincoln
We Coloreds have taken a vote and decided that we don’t cotton to that whole emancipation thing. Freedom means having to work for real, think for ourselves, and take consequences along with the rewards. That is just far too much to ask of us Colored People and we demand that it stop!
In fact we held a big meeting and took a vote in Kansas City this week. We voted to condemn a political revival of that old abolitionist spirit called the ‘tea party movement’.
The tea party position to “end the bailouts” for example is just silly. Bailouts are just big money welfare and isn’t that what we want all Coloreds to strive for? What kind of racist would want to end big money welfare? What they need to do is start handing the bail outs directly to us coloreds! Of course, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People is the only responsible party that should be granted the right to disperse the funds.
And the ridiculous idea of “reduce[ing] the size and intrusiveness of government.” What kind of massa would ever not want to control my life? As Coloreds we must have somebody care for us otherwise we would be on our own, have to think for ourselves and make decisions!
The racist tea parties also demand that the government “stop the out of control spending.” Again, they directly target coloreds. That means we Coloreds would have to compete for jobs like everybody else and that is just not right.
Perhaps the most racist point of all in the tea parties is their demand that government “stop raising our taxes.” That is outrageous! How will we coloreds ever get a wide screen TV in every room if non-coloreds get to keep what they earn? Totally racist! The tea party expects coloreds to be productive members of society?
Mr. Lincoln, you were the greatest racist ever. We had a great gig. Three squares, room and board, all our decisions made by the massa in the house. Please repeal the 13th and 14th Amendments and let us get back to where we belong.
Precious Ben Jealous, Tom’s Nephew NAACP Head Colored Person"

What a fucking asshole!

Yes, there are black racist and bigots too; the first one that comes to mind is James David Manning. (There’s another real piece of racist work for you) But for Williams to say flat out that “it’s impossible for there to be racism in the tea party” is absolute bullshit.

While I know that “all” Tea Partiers are not racists, the movement certainly has it’s share, and this clown is a prime example.

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Wish You Weren’t Here

This blog is being difficult today and won’t let me post this video. But it’s a must see, and I don’t have time to fool with it so here’s a link.


Orly Taitz Lost In The Rabbit Hole

Well, our girl Orly is down to the wire on having to choke up the $20,000 fine she was slapped with for her courtroom incompetence and has fired off a brief to Justice Clarence Thomas. My guess would be she chose Thomas specifically because of this C-Span clip where Thomas makes a crack about citizenship status.

Maybe she considers Thomas an ally in her quest because of this remark that went viral in the Birferverse, but sounded more like a mocking crack to me. In any case, she’s gone “typical Orly” in her brief.


Now, correct me if I’m wrong, but I thought Orly was running the globe claiming to be a “Constitutional Attorney”, (with an online correspondence degree from an unaccredited law school). Now she’s a “Civil rights” attorney? (With an online correspondence degree from an unaccredited law school.)

Maybe she’s confused. She’s been clamoring since the beginning that this whole eligibility thing is a “Constitutional” issue, yet in question #1 she asks:

“Is a Federal Judge allowed to persecute a Civil Rights attorney and sanction her for merely bringing Civil rights violation cases to his court?”

You have to love question #8.

“What Constitutes “natural born citizen” according to Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution?”

Wouldn’t one assume that a real “Constitutional Attorney” would know the answer to that?

And then she’s off, accusing Judge Land of intimidation, slander, and pulling a “legal hit job” on her. Followed of course by her same ole same ole debunked so-called “evidence” in what she refers to as “the most important case today and possibly most important in US history”. (Right, birfer wet dreams again!)

I can’t believe that she is STILL trying to use as evidence the case of Stefan Cook, when that was proven to be a complete fraud. Cook being a reservist conspired with Orly and “volunteered” to go to Afghanistan solely so he could turn around and file that fraudulent complaint to have the orders revoked. And Connie Rhodes who fucking fired her and filed this complaint with the court and the California Bar:

RHODES v MacDONALD - 18 - Letter from plaintiff Connie Rhodes regarding withdrawal of motion to stay - Gov....

What a total dip shit! Most of her other “clients” were nothing but a collection of frauds, forgers and felons.

Here’s some prime Orly “legal logic”:

“Let’s imagine for a moment that someone, a janitor, decides to play a prank. He puts on a black robe and sits on the bench and signs an order for an officer to be deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan, let’s say he signs such order when judge Land is on a bathroom brake. Say, such officer brings a complaint, that the order was illegal. Does it mean, that if the order seems to be legal on it’s face, it is actually legal, regardless of whether the person, who signed it, is actually a judge or a janitor playing a prank? Does an attorney for such officer supposed to be sanctioned $20,000 for merely bringing the claim to court and asking to evaluate it’s validity?”


Ah Ha! We get to the bottom line!

“Sanctions assessed by Land constitute an irreparable harm to Taitz. Land not only assessed sanctions against Taitz and verbally assaulted and insulted her, but he also submitted his order to the CA bar with the clear intent to undermine her law license and take her livelihood away from her. If sanctions are not stayed and reversed, there will be an irreparable harm to the professional license of Taitz and her ability to earn livelihood.”

“Since Land has forwarded his order to the CA bar, there can be irreparable harm in the form of negative sanctions against her license.”

Could it be that when she was summoned before the Bar earlier this year, she was given a last chance? One last chance to appeal the sanctions before they yank her law license all together?

Orly Taitz flatly accuses Judge Land of slandering her, assaulting her character and insulting her with personal attacks. Yet she turns around and accuses him, a federal judge of being guilty of misprision of multiple felonies, aiding and abetting, violation of judicial ethics, abuse of judicial discretion, intimidation, corruption, and an entire gamut of other slanderous charges.

As an attorney, (correspondence school or not) she is supposed to conduct herself as an officer of the court. Is slandering a federal judge what she considers “conduct becoming an officer of the court”?

The California Bar is going to love this!

Alvin Greene Has A Plan To Put The World Back To Work

Alvin Greene did an interview with the “Guardian” , and I must say, Ed Pilkington did a much better job of getting more of the real Alvin than anyone else has done. Still Ed clamed to be as baffled leaving Alvin’s home in South Carolina after the interview, as he was when he arrived. It’s a good article and worth a read.

Alvin’s plan for creating new jobs?

"Another thing we can do for jobs is make toys of me, especially for the holidays. Little dolls. Me. Like maybe little action dolls. Me in an army uniform, air force uniform, and me in my suit. They can make toys of me and my vehicle, especially for the holidays and Christmas for the kids. That's something that would create jobs. So you see I think out of the box like that. It's not something a typical person would bring up. That's something that could happen, that makes sense. It's not a joke."

Well, he’s right it’s not something a typical candidate would come up with.

Apparently South Carolina State Law Enforcement is conducting a probe on Alvin and intends to try and use a new law that will allow them to subpoena his financial records. They seem very interested in exactly how he came up with the $10,400 filing fee in March to get his name on the ticket, when last November he was given a court appointed attorney when he was charged with showing internet porn to a college student.

He claims to have saved that money for two years while still in the army. But if that’s the case and he was in possession of those funds last November, there is no way he could have qualified for a public defender. Looks like either way something isn’t right there.

Alvin’s good news is that he finally has his own Campaign Website” . Not that it says much either, but it does have a place to make donations and has a nice picture of Alvin wearing his suit on his “About Greene” page.

Monday, July 5, 2010

A Pancake Revelation

Gee… Orly has never looked more beautiful!
(Of course the real OT would never be caught on camera with her mouth shut)

Well what do you know! Orly was finally right, it was George Soros. And of course for a private citizen (such as George) to commission a painting from an artist that may embarrass another private citizen (such as Orly) is a very serious crime, probably even a felony and she will no doubt “demand” he be prosecuted for it. That, and or try and slap him with a lawsuit. I can’t wait to see the charges and allegations she makes on this one.

Sunday, July 4, 2010

Happy 4th of July

I’ve never been much of a fan of musicals, but James Cagney was a hell of an actor, and his 1942 musical “Yankee Doodle Dandy” has always been one of my favorite 4th of July movies.

Here’s a great clip

“America Never Stops Dancing 4th of July Video mix 50’s and 60’s”

You know, we were all geeks in the 60’s, but DAMN that was fun! And yes… Evis was HOT!

Enjoy the fireworks!

And finally… for the 4th of July and in the name of patriotism I’d like to dedicate this little tune to all the Birfers and Baggers out there that work so hard at being our country’s biggest assholes.

Friday, July 2, 2010

Orly Taitz, Chronic Loser And Terminally Ignorant

Taitz v Dunn, Stay of election certification, Denied. Imagine that! But of course failure never stopped her before, in fact she must actually thrive on it. Well… That and stupidity.

She got her drawers in a big knot over the OC Weekly  story that referred to her quest against Damon Dunn as a Jihad (good analogy) and flew off the handle, (again.)

Posted on June 30, 2010 
I was not planning to make a big deal about the next hearing in my case against Dunn, however this Marxist scum from the ultra left yellow gazette OC weekly, Spencer Kornhaber, decided to mount yet another attack on me.
First he posted a picture, where I am unrecognizable, then he called my legitimate legal action against Dunn “a jihad’ and announced to all of those Pro-Obama nutcases that the case will be heard for a motion hearing tomorrow in judge Jeffrey Glass courtroom in Santa Ana Superior court at 9am. He misrepresented the issues as always. it is no pleasure to see those brain dead Obama supporters, who support Dunn because he is a lifelong Democrat and calls Obama his political hero.
It is 9pm now,I don’t know if anyone is still reading the blogs and would like to come to the courtroom, but if you do read it now and can come and show some support, please come tomorrow at 9 am, department 33, 700 civic center dr, Santa Ana”

She wonders why the media (and everyone else) considers her such a joke. Here is a woman who considers herself a professional, a “Constitutional Attorney”, the most patriotic American in this country, and a serious Republican Candidate for the office of SOS, yet she publicly calls everyone who disagrees with her “Pro-Obama nutcases”, and “brain dead”. Now, does that show class and professionalism or what? What do you suppose she would do if Obama came out and called her an “ignorant birther whack job”? Would she consider those remarks appropriate?

And you have to love this:

“Does Obama think that each and every American is a complete idiot?
Posted on July 1, 2010 
Now Obama is giving a speech and saying that being American is not determined by blood or birth. Seriously? Then why do we have ICE? Why do me have immigration? Why do we have borders? Just because his puppeteers want to dismantle US sovereignty and shove down our throats amnesty and North American Union, that nobody wants, does not mean that it is right and that the citizens of this country, and minutemen, and patriots are not rising and will not fight.
Does this arrogant fraud really think that each and every American is a complete idiot? Does his statement mean that if I reach the Supreme Court and they decide in my favor, the fact that he was not an American by birth and by blood will be o’k for usurpation of the US Presidency, does it mean that he will not be impeached and criminally prosecuted?”

“Arrogant fraud”, another of her classy professional lawyer/politician terms? I believe she has some kind of learning disability that completely blocks her ability to focus on reality. Do you think she can raise an army as big as Mad Man Manning did at his play trial to fight and take over this country? Ah… sedition and treason!

In Obama’s speech about immigration reform he states:

“Of course, the tensions around immigration are not new. On the one hand, we’ve always defined ourselves as a nation of immigrants -- a nation that welcomes those willing to embrace America’s precepts. Indeed, it is this constant flow of immigrants that helped to make America what it is. The scientific breakthroughs of Albert Einstein, the inventions of Nikola Tesla, the great ventures of Andrew Carnegie’s U.S. Steel and Sergey Brin’s Google, Inc. -– all this was possible because of immigrants.”

He goes on:

“These women, and men and women across this country like them, remind us that immigrants have always helped to build and defend this country -– and that being an American is not a matter of blood or birth. It’s a matter of faith. It’s a matter of fidelity to the shared values that we all hold so dear. That’s what makes us unique. That’s what makes us strong. Anybody can help us write the next great chapter in our history.”

Is she so absolutely beyond any hope that she can’t see that Obama is talking about people just like her, (except not so fucking stupid). He is talking about immigrants and what they have given to the history of this nation. Orly Taitz was not born an American, or not on American soil, she’s an immigrant, though hardly of the caliber Obama is referring to.

Quite the contrary, Orly is a horse of a different color all together. Instead of coming here and embracing this country, she slanders it, calls every official and the entire government corrupt criminal thugs, she advocates treason and armed sedition. She gathered her witnesses consisting of frauds forgers, drug addicts, and felons and went to court in a deluded attempt to remove a sitting President. She claimed them to be reliable witnesses and “proof” of Obama’s ineligibility, but when they turned on her and gave sworn testimony of her suborning perjury they were suddenly nothing but “lying criminals”. She just oozes hate and ignorance. Serious ignorance if she believes anyone is going to buy her tripe.

She has another post on her website about the latest Obot plot:

The truth can now be told. Embedded in our nation’s road sign system is a secret coding designed to target vital sites, facilities, routes and resources for military confiscation during a National Emergency. Though, concealed by the lies of the Department of Transportation for many years, “Free Indeed Research” has tapped deeply into one of the most clever, and deceptive cover-up operations to come down the pike in years! (If you think GPS will be working normally in the scenario described herein, think again.)The United Nations military has plans to become the cop soldiers of the world. Unknown to the general populace, a “Rapid Deployment” force stands ready to enter U.S. borders at the request of the President of the United States during a national emergency. They will perform “peacekeeping” operations such as evacuations, rounding up dissenters, confiscating firearms and incuring facilities and sites for military use. These forces are laced with foreign troops that do not speak english. Therefore, as a tactical advance, all nations have been secretly revamping their roads sign systems to conform to an international standard under the guise of the WTO. It is our belief that these signs and reflective markers “TACMARS” on the backs of many signs are coded to target vital sites, facilities and resources to be confiscated and used by these troops.pointing to a “RITE AID” pharmacy with “ONE HOUR” passport, photo ID; drive-thru window with scanners, inoculation center to vaccinate populace.”

Give me a friggin break! Just how deluded can this woman be? She is also still pissed about losing the SOS election (because of Obot tampering with the voting machines of course) to the other black usurper that plagues her life, Damon Dunn, and has this to say:

“It became crystal clear that the oligarchy is simply making an mockery out of the elections process. I believe people are becoming disenchanted with the union as it is. Many are looking at secession of individual states and formation of a new union as the only viable option to stop this nightmare.
I believe AZ and TX might be the first ones to secede and form a new Union. Their citizens will be able to breathe after years of giving nearly half of their income to the Federal government, which not only didn’t perform a single function it was supposed to perform, but simply engaged in mass looting of the National treasury.”

Right! Sedition agian!

Orly honey, why don’t you just pack up your dental chairs and your crazy conspiracies and carry your stupid ass back to Moldavia.