Thursday, April 15, 2010

Orly Taitz Files Notice and Motion for Reconsideration in Healthcare Case

Honest to God I hope she gets it. Nothing would make me happier than to see all those Attorney Generals attempt to fight their case against Healthcare reform with her in tow. Alas, I’m quite sure it will never happen.

The AG’s “issue” and sole purpose for filing the lawsuit is to question the constitutionality of the healthcare reform law. (Absurd as that may be.) But they have no interest, what so ever in Orly’s raving birther madness. (As a matter of fact the Teabaggers don’t even want to be seen with her anymore!) Orly on the other hand probably couldn’t give a rat’s ass about healthcare reform, and only cares about getting that Black Muslim usurper out of the White House. I’d bet a “case” of Red Stripe, and a bottle of Jameson’s finest that she hasn’t even read the damn thing.

In her original motion to horn in on the case in the first place, she submitted 8 pages, and within those 8 pages was one lone sentence in regard to the healthcare reform bill. “ The Patient Protection and Affordability Care Act imposes an unreasonable infringement upon her gainful employment in Dental Surgery as overburdening interstate commerce in clear violation of the Commerce Clause.”

But… She documents no evidence or even attempts to explain exactly what that infringement or overburdening is. Could it be that she doesn’t friggin know?? Maybe she thought that bit just sounded good, sounded like a good headline. (Geesh!)

So now she fires off 6 more pages, of Obama, Obama, Obama, and then claims; “While a whole class of medical providers will be negatively affected by the institution of Universal Healthcare, none of the current plaintiffs has either knowledge or standing to represent this class of plaintiffs.

(Holy Shit! We got “Universal Healthcare”! I must have missed that part.)

Again, she makes no explanation or even attempts to identify exactly what all this negative affect is. And she apparently doesn’t even know that it is does not contain “Universal Healthcare”. (A public Option would have been nice, but I’m not giving up on that one yet!)

Of course she threw in all the hubbub about different African newspapers quoting that Obama was “Kenyan born”, (and are you ready for this?) she sites a “World Nut Daily” article as her source!

This woman claims to be a lawyer, but she probably didn’t even sleep at a Holiday Inn last night. (Though I hear she can put a mean spin on a dental chair!)

STATE of FLORIDA, et al. v U.S. DHHS, et al - 27 - Notice and MOTION for Reconsideration - Flnd-0490273621...

4 comments:

  1. Good Lord.

    But (the AG's) have no interest, what so ever in Orly’s raving birther madness.
    We can hope, anyway. Not much evidence either way, though.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why doesn't the CA Bar just yank this stupid woman's license to practice law? She is seriously full of herself and thinks she is the best attorney there ever was when she couldn't find her way around the law with a map.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "he AG’s “issue” and sole purpose for filing the lawsuit is to question the constitutionality of the healthcare reform law."

    And to pander to the right in their attempts to run for higher office.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You've got it Ian, whoring for votes.

    ReplyDelete