Friday, December 4, 2009
Birthers: Just who are they really?
My general opinion was they were nothing more than racist assholes hell bent not to fall subordinate to some “Uppity Negro” who had the gall to think he could just march his little black ass right through the front door of the White House. So I had no interest in reading about them. But when I saw the headline about Maj. Cook, being the military brat that I am I took sudden offence at an Army officer trying to dodge a deployment in such a manor.
I read the article and as it all turned out, this guy Cook was not active duty, but a reservist who sent a “request to volunteer” to his command to go to Afghanistan on May 8th 2009, 5 months after Obama took office. With his request granted orders were cut on 6/9/09 for him to deploy on 7/15/09.
Any reservist who volunteers for an assignment has the right to rescind that request and have the orders revoked up until the scheduled day of deployment, in his case that would have been 7/15/09. The week before that date on July 8th he and Orly Taitz filed a restraining order in federal court to avoid this deployment on grounds that Obama was ineligible. Well, if he didn’t want to go, and thought Obama ineligible why would he volunteer to go? That made no sense, even less given the fact that he could have just called his command and said “ Ah, Never Mind!”
The answer? Publicity. It was nothing but a cheap publicity stunt from the off. Big Headlines, “Army Officer Sues to Avoid Deployment, Claims Obama is ineligible to be commander in chief.” The army just canceled his orders, they had too much to worry about in Afghanistan to be bothered with this clown, and I can’t say as I blame them.
Orly Taitz was all over that like flies on a pile of dung. She publicly claimed the army canceled Cook’s orders because they knew if she got them into court she would win and prove Obama was a fraud. What a crock! I couldn’t believe that she was dumb enough to think that anyone (with ½ a brain cell) would fall for that crap; in fact the only ones who did were her deranged followers. (There you go!)
I have had considerable laughs since at the absurd comedy sideshow they have become as they repeatedly get kicked out of every court they set foot in. Mel Brooks himself couldn’t have written a more comically outrageous script. I swear the people who believe that these idiots are really on to something probably don’t have the brainpower to qualify to ride the short bus! If they paid the slightest attention to who these people really are that are leading the charge they would die of embarrassment. Lets have a look.
She has been fired by several clients, one Connie Rhodes who then filed a complaint against her with the California Bar. Two others, Larry Sinclair and Lucas Smith who filed sworn affidavits with the courts attesting to her suborning perjury from both of them and accusing her of having an adulterous affair with one Charles E. Lincoln III, a disbarred lawyer, convicted felon, and her primary legal “assistant”. She swears none of that is true, but old Chucky boy came forward and said, “Yep, got me some of that!”
She has had multiple complaints filed against her and was even slapped with a $20,000 fine for her courtroom behavior. She publicly slanders every judge that that doesn’t rule in her favor and accuses them all of treason. In fact I can find no evidence that she has ever won a single case. But to give all dogs their due, (as my mother used to say) the x-clients that accused her of suborning perjury are themselves nothing but criminals. However before they turned on Orly, according to her they were “very reliable witnesses”.